The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 May 2016, 11:15 PM   #1
Ckci
"TRF" Member
 
Ckci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Russell
Location: KC, MO
Watch: FedEx 4 next 1
Posts: 2,244
I HATE WHEN RSC's SWAP PARTS WITHOUT PERMISSION! To me it's a BIG Issue!

There is a thread I just read today about a guy who sent in his explorer I for some work and the T-Rex hand (short minute hand) was swapped out without his consent. Rolex service people doing this without the owners written consent makes it impossible for me to feel good about sending them any watch of mine. This is especially true when it comes to all original Vintage Rolex watches! Here is my response on that thread. As a TRF family I think we have they ability to get this very dangerous practice changed. I'd like to explore the idea of producing an open letter that members could sign onto and that could be sent to Rolex Inc, the RSC's and to the AD's. As owners of fine Rolex watches we all love we have the right to have them serviced with confidence that we will get them back without key parts of their heritage being removed! I'm sure plenty of people on the site don't care about this as an issue but I'm also sure there are many here who see these as collectable in there original condition and don't want any parts removed without their permission.

Here's a copy of my other post:
" I absolutely HATE when Rolex feels like they can do whatever the H*LL they want with a watch! To me that is FELONY when they start removing and confiscating original parts off of watches. These original parts have lots of value when it comes to older watches. These people at RSC's know this and I'd be shocked it they aren't taking these home and selling them on the black market for a substantial profit. Anyone who is into Vintage knows how drastically that can impact the value of a watch. Service dials etc are complete BS if the change wasn't requested. I will never trust one of my vintage watches to them. If they ask and the person opts in for a swap like this that is one thing but otherwise it makes me despise the RSC's. Anyone who gets into collecting Vintage Rolex watches I'm sure feels the same!"

Does anyone agree?

Sincerely,
Russell
Ckci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:17 PM   #2
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Many vingage pieces go unserviced for this very reason.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:21 PM   #3
jon_jon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
I have heard about this issue as well. I know it is one of the reasons why many forum members use Rolex certified independent watchmakers to service their older watches.
jon_jon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:25 PM   #4
josephvman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
Um...no.

This has been policy for decades at RSC's, and if you're servicing a watch that this might be an issue with (vintage, collectible, etc.) you would know this. If you don't want a dial/hands changed at an RSC, it's a simple matter of discussing what they will and won't do before they service your piece. If the piece isn't important enough to you to have a "meeting of the minds" beforehand, then this is where you end up, and it's not their fault, it's yours.

There are plenty of qualified people who will work on your watch with the intention of doing minimally-invasive service or repairs, and all it takes is a simple search right here on TRF. There are literally hundreds of threads on the topic.
josephvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:44 PM   #5
Thegr8one
"TRF" Member
 
Thegr8one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Canada
Watch: 79090 & 79180
Posts: 227
When I serviced my 1977 1680 with RSC Toronto, I simply spoke with them on the phone and wrote on the form what I wanted them to do, but more importantly, what I didn't want them to do and they followed the instructions to the letter. I agree with Josephvman, it just needs to be communicated clearly and they should be good. Or atleast tell you otherwise so you can make a decision.
Thegr8one is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:47 PM   #6
beer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
agree i saw someone send a patinad watch in and the hands and lume were all replaced, i know the intentions were good but it destroyed the value of the vintage piece
__________________
beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:48 PM   #7
Memphis
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Connecticut
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 448
you know what i hate... grown men using capital letters. it's the same as yelling and you wouldn't do it in a face to face conversation.

and worse... you're doing it off of "hear-say". you've clearly never dealt personally with this scenario.
Memphis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:48 PM   #8
Rolex addict
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
You not only need to communicate it clearly, but put it in writing.
Rolex addict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:49 PM   #9
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Great thread Russell.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 May 2016, 11:50 PM   #10
RichM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RichM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,775
I believe the RSC will continue with business as usual and would have no problem telling you to take your business elsewhere. That's just the way they are. At least in the NYC RSC.

Every watch that I've sent through there, I've always been informed of what work would be done before the work begins. I also had to give them my OK. None of these have been vintage. I also believe the RSC is not in the business of restoring vintage watches but rather to make them into like new condition.

If I had a vintage watch that required special attention, I'd go to the private sector.

Keep in mind I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying that's how it is.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day"
TRF #139960
RichM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:13 AM   #11
ppbskis
"TRF" Member
 
ppbskis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pt. Pl. Beach, NJ
Posts: 302
This happened to me back in the day before the internet and Forums. My 1988 11600 was sent in to Rolex for service in say 1992 or 1993.
The original dial with the large Tritium lume was replaced with the newfangled white gold surround indicators, boy was I happy!
Fast forward to 2012 or so when I joined this forum and the sickness in my stomach manifested itself. From what I have learned in this community my original face is worth more than my watch currently is.
I hate being reminded but I guess the more we let people know, the more original pieces may survive.
So from now on don't " Keep it real", keep it "original"!

Last edited by ppbskis; 21 May 2016 at 12:15 AM.. Reason: spelling error
ppbskis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:21 AM   #12
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Good idea put it in writing then there is no miscommunication
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:35 AM   #13
Qinhan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Qinhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 632
For me, I've heard too many horror stories about RSC doing exactly this that I've never used them and have no plan on doing so in future. Having found a passionate and diligent independent, I'm happy to use his services and feel comfortable that he's not going to be doing anything that I don't want to one of my precious watches.
Qinhan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:35 AM   #14
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by ppbskis View Post
This happened to me back in the day before the internet and Forums. My 1988 11600 was sent in to Rolex for service in say 1992 or 1993.
The original dial with the large Tritium lume was replaced with the newfangled white gold surround indicators, boy was I happy!
Fast forward to 2012 or so when I joined this forum and the sickness in my stomach manifested itself. From what I have learned in this community my original face is worth more than my watch currently is.
I hate being reminded but I guess the more we let people know, the more original pieces may survive.
So from now on don't " Keep it real", keep it "original"!

They did that free? Otherwise wouldn't you have been asked to authorize the charges?
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:41 AM   #15
ppbskis
"TRF" Member
 
ppbskis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pt. Pl. Beach, NJ
Posts: 302
In 1992 there were no cell phones etc. so most likely it went in for service and Rolex deemed my current dial was not worthy and replaced it. Most likely I would have cheerfully said wow, you can make it look just like todays model. Think if you had a car go to the dealer for service and they offered to freshen up and modernize it free or at little cost, most would say yes and regret later, isn't there an inferior Panerai movement in a piece that Panerai later replaced for offended customers? From what I know those inferior movements are now prized pieces.
Hindsight is 20/20
ppbskis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 12:48 AM   #16
Verdi
"TRF" Member
 
Verdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mitch
Location: UAE
Watch: Big Ben
Posts: 2,451
Rolex should have a standard option of doing a service without any replacement of parts other than on the movement.
__________________
IG: @watch_idiot_savant
Verdi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 01:09 AM   #17
sco
"TRF" Member
 
sco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
I get the frustration, but I would like the option to "upgrade" while it is in for a service as well.
sco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 01:17 AM   #18
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
I understand the frustration but, in the absence of clear and detailed instructions, RSC reserves the right to restore the watch to proper operating specifications using parts available to them. If we don't want something done then it's incumbent on us to communicate that. Of course misunderstandings and human error will always happen. This is why I recommend independents for vintage or important time pieces. I'd only send in a watch to RSC that I wouldn't mind seeing brought back to original condition.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 02:24 AM   #19
Runnin' Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Runnin' Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
Is there a Doctor around ? Looks like a couple forum members are ready to have a stroke today over this.
__________________
Runnin' Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 02:27 AM   #20
ref1655
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verdi View Post
Rolex should have a standard option of doing a service without any replacement of parts other than on the movement.
+1...a standard servicing for current models (with parts replacement at their discretion) & a vintage servicing whereby nothing cosmetic is changed/altered without previous consent from the owner.
ref1655 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 02:30 AM   #21
Anthon
"TRF" Member
 
Anthon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I understand the frustration but, in the absence of clear and detailed instructions, RSC reserves the right to restore the watch to proper operating specifications using parts available to them. If we don't want something done then it's incumbent on us to communicate that. Of course misunderstandings and human error will always happen. This is why I recommend independents for vintage or important time pieces. I'd only send in a watch to RSC that I wouldn't mind seeing brought back to original condition.
What right do they have? The watch is mine and mine alone. I'm not wearing it under license. If they want to swap out perfectly functioning parts for 'the latest model', they better ask first.

The new hands on an older Explorer change the appearance of the watch dramatically. All the more reason to specifically ask for permission before changing these parts.
Anthon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 02:53 AM   #22
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthon View Post
What right do they have? The watch is mine and mine alone. I'm not wearing it under license. If they want to swap out perfectly functioning parts for 'the latest model', they better ask first.

The new hands on an older Explorer change the appearance of the watch dramatically. All the more reason to specifically ask for permission before changing these parts.
They have the right that practically all monopolies have. If you want a dial swap and they agree you pay for the new dial and they will almost certainly keep your old dial. Ain't just Rolex, big business/money rules the world as has become increasingly clear to all since the credit crunch, don't know why we really bother with pantomime politicians any more other than for entertainment.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 03:15 AM   #23
wuyeah
"TRF" Member
 
wuyeah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 952
Feel like banks taking money here and there without telling you what's going until you question them. It's like your money is actually their money.
wuyeah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 04:16 AM   #24
Alexwwjd
"TRF" Member
 
Alexwwjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Texas
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 2,352
Drinking a Chamomile/Lavender tea right now..... Need to relax after reading this thread


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Alexwwjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 04:17 AM   #25
R1@160@alltimes
"TRF" Member
 
R1@160@alltimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: ♛
Posts: 4,408
Reputable watchmakers will never do such a thing. That's why I only deal with Vanessa at JOT
__________________
R1@160@alltimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 04:44 AM   #26
masyv6
2024 Pledge Member
 
masyv6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: 35000ft
Posts: 3,771
Don't bother risking it. Too many horror stories of watches being destroyed by the RSC to risk it.
masyv6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 04:46 AM   #27
KenNethcole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Socal
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1@160@alltimes View Post
Reputable watchmakers will never do such a thing. That's why I only deal with Vanessa at JOT
Same here JOT for me as well. When I brought in my older watch they wrote down on the repair form to not change anything even without me having to tell them. If you feel rsc is not doing what you want just take your business to an independent.
KenNethcole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 05:01 AM   #28
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
Is there a sense of cross-purpose here? Rolex undertake to service and bring a watch up to the best possible condition. That's their stated aim, to service the watch properly so it's in the best condition.
But some vintage guys have a quite different aim...to maximise value; that can mean, for instance, that Submariners are left without meaningful water resistance in the name of 'authenticity.'. Two quite different sets of values. One is the best quality functioning watch, the other something frozen in time and seen as an 'investment,'
It's simply not the task or aim of Rolex to go into the vintage watch business. So, if people value original parts over actual operational quality, that's fine...just use a specialist set-up to meet your requirements.
But don't blame Rolex for wanting to bring their watches up to the best operational standard. That's what they do. The obsessive behaviour of collectors is a quite different world. Never the two shall meet!
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 05:28 AM   #29
Eric Chan
"TRF" Member
 
Eric Chan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephvman View Post
Um...no.

This has been policy for decades at RSC's, and if you're servicing a watch that this might be an issue with (vintage, collectible, etc.) you would know this. If you don't want a dial/hands changed at an RSC, it's a simple matter of discussing what they will and won't do before they service your piece. If the piece isn't important enough to you to have a "meeting of the minds" beforehand, then this is where you end up, and it's not their fault, it's yours.

There are plenty of qualified people who will work on your watch with the intention of doing minimally-invasive service or repairs, and all it takes is a simple search right here on TRF. There are literally hundreds of threads on the topic.
This just about sums it up.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Eric Chan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 May 2016, 05:40 AM   #30
ZeKe
"TRF" Member
 
ZeKe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Grandpa's Tissot
Posts: 733
Good thread.
I'd sign that petition.

It would be nice if Rolex (at least) gave back our original parts to do with as we please.
ZeKe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.