ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 July 2008, 08:16 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 96
|
A question about perpetual date function
I read here that the perpetual calendar is "the most developed form" of the simple date window that keeps track of the date, day of the week, month, year and leap years. My question is, how does my rolex know that it's currently July, 2008 when all I see is today's date, which is "30" ? I hope this is not a silly question!
|
30 July 2008, 08:41 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
Your rolex is not a perpetual calendar in the sense of complications. It has no idea what time of the year it is nor what month it is. It only displays the date and that's it unless it's a day date. February for example has 28 days in the month. You will have to set the watch to the 1st when 1 march rolls around. Hope this helps.
__________________
Ron |
30 July 2008, 08:48 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Abu Dhabi
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 96
|
Thanks. I just realized that it was a stupid question. I was mislead for a moment by the "oyster perpetual date" written on the dial. I just realized that perpetual here means perpetual rotor, nothing to do with date. Thanks for confirming what I just realized.
|
30 July 2008, 09:02 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
No stupid questions here. Ask away anytime. We are here to help.
__________________
Ron |
30 July 2008, 09:05 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lost
Watch: Watchless(for now)
Posts: 267
|
you just learned something new today, that is a great achievement IMO. It is good you asked that question.
|
30 July 2008, 11:21 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
If you hate to reset just buy the right watch. The Timex for $425 or the Lange for about $70,000
|
30 July 2008, 12:58 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Terry Newton
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c
Posts: 6,644
|
Oh but the Lange is so much more beautiful. But at my beer pocket book I could afford the Timex. It's a great looking Timex though.
Terry Newton
__________________
Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc |
30 July 2008, 03:43 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
30 July 2008, 04:23 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Without knowing the brand
I think Timex is prettier. Maybe because Lange is a gold watch.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
30 July 2008, 06:32 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: San Diego
Posts: 198
|
This Perpetual Calendar watch is on my current list.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.