The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 September 2016, 05:11 AM   #1
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Advice Please: PAM 351 or 441 OR you tell me...

Hey all,

I think I'm gonna take another swing at Panerai. I love the ceramic line, and before we get started you should know I owned a Radiomir 292. I really enjoyed the watch, but realized after a relatively short period of time the wire lugs weren't really my favorite flavor.

So I spent some time at the AD yesterday and realized I want a 44mm Luminor 1950. I also fell hard for the Ti case on the 351. I think the tone of the metal looks amazing with the brown dial and strap.

At this moment I am most interested in the Titanium 351 and the Ceramic 441, and I am very open to other suggestions. Here's my list of preferences...

Price: $5k-9k (preowned or new, trusted seller route most likely)
Size: 44-45mm
Collection: Luminor 1950
Materials: Ceramic, Titanium, Steel
Function/Complications: Seconds & Date (no date is ok too, but I do like having it)
Dial: Sandwich dial, (Tobacco if possible)

Extras Preferences: I really like the tobacco dials, I do like the exhibition case back, I love the brown Asso strap but also really think the croco straps are handsome. I would prefer less complications to cut down on cost and because I frankly don't need them.

Questions:
  • I did try on the 351 yesterday and loved it. I was told by a trusted expert that the movement actually weights more than the Ti case and therefor feels unbalanced when you wear it for a while. Anyone have any experience with that?
  • Any other reasons why I should avoid either of these models?
  • Obviously what other models should I look into? I saw the 312 checks a lot of boxes for me. Should I be considering that? I also saw there's a 1312... what's the deal with that?
  • I'm obviously not buying with the intention of flipping, but Panerai is pretty new to me, it's always a possibility that I will trade or sell. Are there some models that hold their value better than others?
Thank you all so much! Below are the pics of my two front runners. The first two I pulled from google images, the last one is the 351 on my wrist.


Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 05:19 AM   #2
supra8903
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: NY
Watch: Rolex Sub 114060
Posts: 277
351 or 564. I like 1950s cases, but only in hand wind (422, 372, etc)

Id avoid ceramic if you bang your watch into things, and with that thickness you will.

id say standard luminor marinia 564 or if you want 1950s, the 351.
supra8903 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 05:28 AM   #3
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
13XX series are new for this year (or this 6 months)..panerai releases new models randomly..
the 13XX series have a bit thinner movement..so makes the piece more wearable..I had the 312 and found with the auto rotor, the watch is THICK and top heavy..kinda like the DSSD...not as bad but still tall...I really liked the 312 and was my first but it got too tall for me (6.5") wrist...

check this out:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=474968

I had composite and ceramic cases and after all that..I went back to Steel as rest just had too many issues that I had to deal with interms of wearability...

I would look into a 233 and a gently used one can be had around 8k..great piece..thinner handwound..date and GMT that can be hidden...8 day movement with fang

otherwise..just go simple...tons of 44mm handwond Ti Luminors in their lineup...

go new and get a nice discount or gently used...
__________________
too much into watches...

Last edited by ocwatching; 23 September 2016 at 05:32 AM.. Reason: add link
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 06:11 AM   #4
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by ocwatching View Post
13XX series are new for this year (or this 6 months)..panerai releases new models randomly..
the 13XX series have a bit thinner movement..so makes the piece more wearable..I had the 312 and found with the auto rotor, the watch is THICK and top heavy..kinda like the DSSD...not as bad but still tall...I really liked the 312 and was my first but it got too tall for me (6.5") wrist...

check this out:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=474968

I had composite and ceramic cases and after all that..I went back to Steel as rest just had too many issues that I had to deal with interms of wearability...

I would look into a 233 and a gently used one can be had around 8k..great piece..thinner handwound..date and GMT that can be hidden...8 day movement with fang

otherwise..just go simple...tons of 44mm handwond Ti Luminors in their lineup...

go new and get a nice discount or gently used...
Thanks very much! Do you have any opinion about the Ti model I already mentioned, the 351? The price is right for me. Although it may not be as thin as the 233 or 1312, its obviously lighter which might actually be an improvement of the top heavy feeling you mentioned about the 312.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 07:38 AM   #5
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by supra8903 View Post
351 or 564. I like 1950s cases, but only in hand wind (422, 372, etc)

Id avoid ceramic if you bang your watch into things, and with that thickness you will.

id say standard luminor marinia 564 or if you want 1950s, the 351.
Het thanks for chiming in. So the 422 and 372 are a bit too big for my liking.

The 564 is intriguing to me! So why do you prefer manual wind?
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 08:45 AM   #6
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
I have heard that the 351 wears better as its not as heavy..also to answer your other question...Panerai DNA is hand wound..but not that it really matters...

sounds like you are love struck!

great values to be had right now...just keep in mind of the thickness..I have found I like to wear it snug

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
Thanks very much! Do you have any opinion about the Ti model I already mentioned, the 351? The price is right for me. Although it may not be as thin as the 233 or 1312, its obviously lighter which might actually be an improvement of the top heavy feeling you mentioned about the 312.
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 10:00 AM   #7
ap1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
I've gone through a ton of PAMs. I'm really liking 1392 as it's about 4mm thinner which so far is making me really like this watch. I don't have the wrist for a 44mm. I think the 351 is a real looker but don't k ow about the top heaviness of the ti. 389 is a sick diver. I'd say 1312 is a great option if 351 isn't comfy. I'm not sure the purists like these newest ones but I feel they are a step forward. (Forcefield activated)
Attached Images
 
ap1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 12:35 PM   #8
Ruud Van Driver
"TRF" Member
 
Ruud Van Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
359. The second hand is the only complication. The polished 1950 luminor case is a beauty and houses the 'dirty' sandwich dial with arabics. This is getting more wrist time than handcuffs on a bank robber.
Attached Images
   
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737

"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott
Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Ruud Van Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2016, 01:35 PM   #9
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver View Post
359. The second hand is the only complication. The polished 1950 luminor case is a beauty and houses the 'dirty' sandwich dial with arabics. This is getting more wrist time than handcuffs on a bank robber.
That's stunning! 44mm?
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 01:56 AM   #10
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
for Ti and tobacco dials, the two luminors that first come to mind for me are the 118 or 564 (564 for the 8-day movement & buying new/new-ish, 118 for not having "8 DAYS" on the dial & a cheaper/easier movement to service). 36 is obviously amazing, but, that's a different price bracket.

for ceramic, since you don't like the wire lugs (shame b/c the 643 is ), the 441 is the choice....and it's a goregous one at that! 441 + asso strap is

i'm just not sure i would want the 441 to be my only PAM...i would still want an SS or Ti model.

if you also considering steel, there are a TON of options....but, if you want a tobacco dial, the only choice is the 351. the 351 is a really nice choice, but i find the 1950 luminor case to be too thick for my wrist. your mileage may vary.

Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 09:05 AM   #11
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
for Ti and tobacco dials, the two luminors that first come to mind for me are the 118 or 564 (564 for the 8-day movement & buying new/new-ish, 118 for not having "8 DAYS" on the dial & a cheaper/easier movement to service). 36 is obviously amazing, but, that's a different price bracket.

for ceramic, since you don't like the wire lugs (shame b/c the 643 is ), the 441 is the choice....and it's a goregous one at that! 441 + asso strap is

i'm just not sure i would want the 441 to be my only PAM...i would still want an SS or Ti model.

if you also considering steel, there are a TON of options....but, if you want a tobacco dial, the only choice is the 351. the 351 is a really nice choice, but i find the 1950 luminor case to be too thick for my wrist. your mileage may vary.

What he said, agreed
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 10:20 AM   #12
nick c
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 26,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by cru jones View Post
for ti and tobacco dials, the two luminors that first come to mind for me are the 118 or 564 (564 for the 8-day movement & buying new/new-ish, 118 for not having "8 days" on the dial & a cheaper/easier movement to service). 36 is obviously amazing, but, that's a different price bracket.

For ceramic, since you don't like the wire lugs (shame b/c the 643 is ), the 441 is the choice....and it's a goregous one at that! 441 + asso strap is

I'm just not sure i would want the 441 to be my only pam...i would still want an ss or ti model.

If you also considering steel, there are a ton of options....but, if you want a tobacco dial, the only choice is the 351. The 351 is a really nice choice, but i find the 1950 luminor case to be too thick for my wrist. Your mileage may vary.

x3
nick c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2016, 10:32 AM   #13
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
The gents have given you great color. Try them if you can find the model.. many grey dealers in diamond district should have plenty for you to see in real person. I am a luminor guy and recently bought a 590 for the 8 day movement and it is pretty simple tool watch. 372 is much too big for my 6.5 inch wrist. If they made it in 44mm, I would buy that in a heartbeat. Enjoy the hunt


red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2016, 01:38 AM   #14
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
for Ti and tobacco dials, the two luminors that first come to mind for me are the 118 or 564 (564 for the 8-day movement & buying new/new-ish, 118 for not having "8 DAYS" on the dial & a cheaper/easier movement to service). 36 is obviously amazing, but, that's a different price bracket.

for ceramic, since you don't like the wire lugs (shame b/c the 643 is ), the 441 is the choice....and it's a goregous one at that! 441 + asso strap is

i'm just not sure i would want the 441 to be my only PAM...i would still want an SS or Ti model.

if you also considering steel, there are a TON of options....but, if you want a tobacco dial, the only choice is the 351. the 351 is a really nice choice, but i find the 1950 luminor case to be too thick for my wrist. your mileage may vary.

Thanks so much for the input! I think I'm leaning towards the 351. I tried on the 312 and just found the weight to be a little bit of an issue on my wrist.

I would love to get my hands on a 1312 before totally committing but they don't seem to readily stock them.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2016, 01:38 AM   #15
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by red1108nyc View Post
The gents have given you great color. Try them if you can find the model.. many grey dealers in diamond district should have plenty for you to see in real person. I am a luminor guy and recently bought a 590 for the 8 day movement and it is pretty simple tool watch. 372 is much too big for my 6.5 inch wrist. If they made it in 44mm, I would buy that in a heartbeat. Enjoy the hunt


That looks amazing! Congrats.

Is that a 1950 case?
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2016, 02:56 AM   #16
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
That looks amazing! Congrats.

Is that a 1950 case?


No. Classic '90s "Bettarini" case (nicknamed after the designer). Same style as the 000, 005, 111, 104, 164, etc.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 12:35 PM   #17
Lemarp
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 168
I previously had the 24 and 88 however ended up moving to the 351. At first the 351 wasn't the greatest in terms of comfort because I was used to heavy, large watches and it seemed a bit too light.

4 years later it's still in my collection because the tobacco dial, ti 1950's case, gold markers and sandwich dial with a display back pack in so much of what I like I don't see myself selling it.

It was down to the 312 and 351 for me but it just felt like I was getting a lot for not too much more with the upgrade to a ti case and gold markers. Not to mention that whenever I find a watch I like in a non-plain black dial, I tend to gravitate towards that because there are so many great watches available in a black dial variant.
Lemarp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2016, 02:54 PM   #18
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemarp View Post
I previously had the 24 and 88 however ended up moving to the 351. At first the 351 wasn't the greatest in terms of comfort because I was used to heavy, large watches and it seemed a bit too light.

4 years later it's still in my collection because the tobacco dial, ti 1950's case, gold markers and sandwich dial with a display back pack in so much of what I like I don't see myself selling it.

It was down to the 312 and 351 for me but it just felt like I was getting a lot for not too much more with the upgrade to a ti case and gold markers. Not to mention that whenever I find a watch I like in a non-plain black dial, I tend to gravitate towards that because there are so many great watches available in a black dial variant.
Great points!!!

I actually end up buying the 351 and about 2 weeks in I'm in love. Been on the wrist every day and night since getting it.

I find the Ti case to be a significantly better balance than the 312 and other similar watches I tried on at some ADs.

I'm just crazy about this watch!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 October 2016, 09:16 AM   #19
fullcourt
"TRF" Member
 
fullcourt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
Great points!!!

I actually end up buying the 351 and about 2 weeks in I'm in love. Been on the wrist every day and night since getting it.

I find the Ti case to be a significantly better balance than the 312 and other similar watches I tried on at some ADs.

I'm just crazy about this watch!
congrats
__________________
dp
just living the dream
chicago, usa

chgo_risti on IG
fullcourt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 October 2016, 09:36 PM   #20
HOHO
"TRF" Member
 
HOHO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: Toronto
Watch: Deep Blue
Posts: 260
I owned a 441 and used it to trade up, but really missed having it.
This time I went after my dream Panerai, the 438 Tuttonero!]

And couldn't be happier!


Great looking watch though, Congrats!
HOHO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.