ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 October 2016, 06:09 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: North East, USA
Posts: 258
|
If he has people offering over $2K then why can't he at least give you that as a starting price/ why isn't he taking those offers? How did you find this clown? Seems so sketchy
|
25 October 2016, 08:11 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: westcoast
Posts: 134
|
Quote:
|
|
25 October 2016, 09:18 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Ro
Location: Chicago
Watch: Aqua Terra 2503.33
Posts: 598
|
"Clown" came as a reference from a guy I sold my Breitling to earlier this year. I had told him that I wanted to purchase a GMT or a Green Submariner (Hulk) version at some point and he came across this guy (don't know how) and referred him to me.....
|
25 October 2016, 09:42 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Peach State
Posts: 735
|
Yeah I'm going with fake as well... the Rolex print on the dial doesn't look big enough to me
|
25 October 2016, 01:39 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16803
Posts: 144
|
SMH at people giving advice about this watch. Anyone with enough knowledge to give advice will spot this as a middle of the road replica from a mile away.
The end all is the incorrect hand sequence. Any information beyond that is purely supplemental and not required. For instance : insert is trash, missing the visible serif on the "1"'s, color and depth is wrong as well. Fonts just wrong. Dial is wrong, coronet is wrong. Rehaut engravings should be more apparent even giving the quality of the photography. 9/6 o clock hour markers appear off. Unfinished lugs. Just pure shit. A little update: I generally also have a slight distrust for people who show their watch without a photograph with the pearl at 12. I generally assume there is an alignment issue one is trying to obfuscate. No dead on picture, well not entirely. It looks as if the cyclops is a bit wonky as well. This is a 150$ replica. I maintain that I will never even entertain the idea of purchasing a multi thousand dollar watch from anyone that takes this quality pictures. |
25 October 2016, 03:09 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
Get some decent pics
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
25 October 2016, 03:35 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: So Cal
Watch: 16803
Posts: 144
|
|
25 October 2016, 09:04 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
No. But it may catagorically prove its fake!
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done." |
25 October 2016, 10:54 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Walter A.
Location: Sunny California
Watch: 16760
Posts: 2,629
|
The watch is no bueno.
__________________
Our shadows taller than our soul........ |
26 October 2016, 01:17 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
|
26 October 2016, 02:15 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 24
|
what was the "serial number"? Goggle it and see how many Chinese fakes come up haha.
|
26 October 2016, 08:27 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: AZ
Watch: 4&5-digit Sub/GMTs
Posts: 1,974
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.