ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Tan · 3 November 2016, 06:58 AM

Hey,

I have stretch on my 6251H bracelet for my 1601 DJ. I was curious to know if collectors would prefer the bracelet to be in original condition or would it be wise to fix the stretch from a watchmaker like Michael Young. The bracelet is from 1969 and the stretch is not terrible, but it is noticeable and I'd like to know your opinion on what you would do in this circumstance.

Thanks,

Tan

Tan · 3 November 2016, 07:06 AM

Here's a pic for those interested..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lordofrolex · 3 November 2016, 07:32 AM

I know when it comes to vintage stretch does matter in terms of sale price. Im currently selling my F serial Day-Date and a lot of peoples concern is stretch on bracelet. Good thing my bracelet has none to minimal stretch but people do ask.

Michael Young out of hong kong you can google him does amazing bracelet restorations. I would contact him and send him pictures. He can walk you through the process.

Tan · 3 November 2016, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lordofrolex

I know when it comes to vintage stretch does matter in terms of sale price. Im currently selling my F serial Day-Date and a lot of peoples concern is stretch on bracelet. Good thing my bracelet has none to minimal stretch but people do ask.

Michael Young out of hong kong you can google him does amazing bracelet restorations. I would contact him and send him pictures. He can walk you through the process.

Yeah, that was the option I was considering. I just wanted to know if a collector would ask about restoration and whether a restored bracelet would be unattractive vs. original with stretch.

springer · 3 November 2016, 09:58 AM

I would not consider that 6251 to be stretched and actually, the stretch appears to be minimal. The links are in need of a proper refinish, which is what I would recommend.

janice&fred · 3 November 2016, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by springer

I would not consider that 6251 to be stretched and actually, the stretch appears to be minimal. The links are in need of a proper refinish, which is what I would recommend.

yes i agree it appears to be a folded jubilee and they were not very tight when new and that one looks like it's in great shape. i wouldn't even refinish it and just wear it as-is.

crowncollection · 3 November 2016, 02:48 PM

It's in pretty good shape IMHO

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Vincent65 · 3 November 2016, 06:53 PM

I agree it's not bad and I'd have it refinished, too.

3 November 2016, 06:58 AM	#1
Tan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Canada Watch: PP 5320G Posts: 1,259	Bracelet stretch and effect on value Hey, I have stretch on my 6251H bracelet for my 1601 DJ. I was curious to know if collectors would prefer the bracelet to be in original condition or would it be wise to fix the stretch from a watchmaker like Michael Young. The bracelet is from 1969 and the stretch is not terrible, but it is noticeable and I'd like to know your opinion on what you would do in this circumstance. Thanks, Tan

3 November 2016, 07:32 AM	#3
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	I know when it comes to vintage stretch does matter in terms of sale price. Im currently selling my F serial Day-Date and a lot of peoples concern is stretch on bracelet. Good thing my bracelet has none to minimal stretch but people do ask. Michael Young out of hong kong you can google him does amazing bracelet restorations. I would contact him and send him pictures. He can walk you through the process. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

3 November 2016, 09:58 AM	#5
springer 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: jP Location: Texas Watch: GMT-MASTER Posts: 17,319	I would not consider that 6251 to be stretched and actually, the stretch appears to be minimal. The links are in need of a proper refinish, which is what I would recommend. __________________ Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.

3 November 2016, 02:48 PM	#7
crowncollection "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: David Location: australia Posts: 20,216	It's in pretty good shape IMHO Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ watches many

3 November 2016, 06:53 PM	#8
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,298	I agree it's not bad and I'd have it refinished, too. __________________

3 November 2016, 07:06 AM	#2
Tan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Canada Watch: PP 5320G Posts: 1,259	Here's a pic for those interested.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)