ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 March 2017, 05:45 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Rolex 1680 red MK2 dial defect?
Hello,
I'm seriously thinking about "investing" in a red Submariner. Either for myself or later to trade/sell it (maybe) I found one from 1973. It looks nicely aged and has awesome patina on the lumes and dial. But (there's always a but, right?) Someone for some reason "touched up" rather say screwed up the dial. ☹️ Based on the attached photos, what is your expert opinion whether it's a no-no or go? I'm also wondering how's such paint job affects the value of this otherwise nice Submariner? I appreciate all advice, opinion. Thanks a bunch! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 March 2017, 06:00 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: N.Wales
Posts: 253
|
That's way too large of a defect in my opinion and I would simply carry on looking at other watches. Red 1680s quite often have some chipping at the dial edge, but this one was either particularly bad or they've touched up way more than required and done a terrible job also.
If you're buying with a view to potentially sell on, this is the worst type of watch to buy. The potential customer base will be vastly reduced as so many people will be put off by the dial damage. |
3 March 2017, 06:04 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
Forget this one, the value is in the dial.
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
3 March 2017, 06:08 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Yeah why did someone have to do that?? I don't get it☹️ What the person was thinking or not thinking for that matter?? Thanks guys for the honest replies
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
3 March 2017, 07:09 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
It's a mess. Too much to mention, really.
Run.
__________________
|
3 March 2017, 07:34 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 203
|
If the price is low enough to factor in getting a replacement original dial then
go for it - otherwise... walk away |
3 March 2017, 08:01 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Dabas, Hungary
Posts: 356
|
Quote:
Yea was thinking about that, let's say the price is about 60% of the same without defect. But still replacement dial, replacement hands... I don't know it might doesn't worth the hassle. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
3 March 2017, 10:28 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Jason
Location: Connecticut
Watch: Tudor 7016, 94010
Posts: 256
|
Id say its not worth the hassle. You're going to spend at least a few grand on the right dial and who knows how long that will take. There's plenty of nice, unadulterated ones out there worth looking for.
|
3 March 2017, 10:58 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Per
Location: Sweden
Watch: Gilt Rolex
Posts: 2,946
|
You will not find a mint red sub dial lose. If you do it will most likely cost you basically the price of a mint red sub watch. No reason anyone would sell one much cheaper than that.
Looking at the case etc I think the dial matches nicely. I would not spend more money on this watch so either buy it for what it is (very, very cheap) or save up more money for a much minter example. Hands on this one is fake? Insert is a service insert. Case is very polished and quite bad and the dial has a massive chip. Price need to reflect all this. By a lot. |
3 March 2017, 11:06 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
Yes, I saw that - fake hands. (rounded, smooth edges and fake lume/patina)
__________________
|
4 March 2017, 03:58 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 6,061
|
This watch is a bit of a train wreck and that case does't warrent a decent dial..
|
4 March 2017, 05:43 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
also, that is certainly not a MK2 dial.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.