|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 March 2017, 06:45 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: india
Posts: 455
|
15202 light ?
Does it feel very light on the wrist after wearing 15202 steel ? I was offered 15400 Blue but refused because I thought it was too big. Now I am thinking was my decision right ?
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 08:35 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
only your own opinion counts
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 08:48 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
202 feels absolutely perfect on the wrist and that is what contributes to its iconic and timeless presence.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 08:49 AM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
|
I have tried on the 15300, and it wasn't heavy. I can't imagine the Extra-Thin being heavier than the 300!
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 11:54 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Have to try it on, then try to take it off
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 01:07 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Austin
Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO
Posts: 1,561
|
15202 is absolutely beautiful but it was too light for me, plus it was missing a few things: screw down crown, seconds hand, quickset date.
The 15400 is what I chose and love it! But if the 15400 was too big then go 15300 or 15202. |
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 03:59 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Ahmed
Location: Abu Dhabi / LA
Posts: 294
|
Its pretty light for an all steel watch
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 07:06 PM
|
#8 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 March 2017, 11:15 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: SMD
Location: LGA/EWR/ORD
Watch: AP/PP
Posts: 3,701
|
The 15202 is more like the weight of a 5711 than it is the 15400. Its "extra thin" all over, bracelet and all. Only you can determine if it feels right for you.
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2017, 12:40 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
I also must admit, as much as I love how the 15202 looks and the history, it has always felt more "delicate" to me...likely due to the weight. As such I went with a blue 15400 which was similar, but a little more heft to it.
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2017, 03:16 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: india
Posts: 455
|
Already refused 15400 Blue now I'm not sure about 15202. I know if I refuse this too they won't entertain me no more. I liked the heft of 15400 and at the same time I tried RG15202 even all the sales representatives told me 15202 SIZE looked good. So after I left the boutique I realised how it would feel in steel.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
18 March 2017, 11:00 AM
|
#12 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Riley
Location: 41.89° N, 87.62°
Watch: URWERK
Posts: 499
|
Quote:
ive had 15300/15202/15400 and the only one i still own and have owned nearly 10 years is 15202. has more character has history it's made to be light and invisible on wrist. the 15300 was created to grab market demand of the 15202 they could not produce enough of, the 15400 was created to grab the trend of larger watches because the 39mm wasnt selling well in 15300 and the ROC... do you want a trend or something thats been top of it's game for 45 years straight? go 15202. |
|
|
|
|
|
18 March 2017, 12:03 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I wouldn't say it's too light. The 15202 has a nice wrist presence. As for the size difference it depends on your wrist. For me the 15400 wore way too large. I went with the 15202 and have no regrets.
 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram @cwin |
|
|
|
|
29 March 2017, 03:23 AM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: india
Posts: 455
|
15202 light ?
I think I'm Still confused...thinking to buy both then I've to let go Daytona C If by any chance I keep both I'll put a rubber or leather strap on 15400 and then I wonder is it worth. I really liked the dial on 15400 I can still picture it but didn't like the size. Already gave a deposit for 15202
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
29 March 2017, 07:01 AM
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
Nice watch!
|
|
|
|
|
29 March 2017, 07:07 AM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,106
|
Get the 15202 no question
|
|
|
|
|
29 March 2017, 07:12 AM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2017, 11:57 PM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: india
Posts: 455
|
Is it ok to have 15202 & 15400 Blue both in the collection ..if you got them please post the pictures
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
