The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 September 2008, 01:42 AM   #31
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
Sorry for the wise-ass comment earlier.

Sorry for the wise-ass comment earlier. I suppose there are many people that do not have technical training that would make all of this very simple and obvious. Pressure is pressure whether it is in water or in air. A water column or depth in water produces pressure at a constant rate depending on the density of the water which varies from fresh water to salt (and can be a bit different due to the level of salinity). Since water is basically non-compressible the rate of change in pressure as you descend in water is constant, as stated earlier, about .445 psi (pounds per square inch) per foot of seawater. In the Atmosphere at sea level the absolute pressure standard at 67 degrees F is approximately 14.7 psia (pounds per square inch absolute) or zero pisg (pounds per square inch gauge). One atmosphere of pressure is equal to this pressure absolute at standard temperature at sea level is 101.325 kPa or in other units that are equivalent: 760 mmHg (torr), 29.92 inHg, 14.696 PSI, 1013.25 millibars.

The difference to a watch between air pressure and water pressure is none. The seals will operate the same and the watch will perform and or fail the same whether it is under 1000 psi of water pressure (about 2247 feet under seawater) or if it is in a pressure vessel pumped up to 1000 psi of air pressure.

The whole question about opening the watch case at high elevation is nearly nil since the amount of pressure change would be less than 1 atmosphere or 15 psi, which is miniscule to the pressure that a diving watch is rated. Change in elevation vs. change in absolute pressure is not a constant because air as a fluid medium is highly compressible, so the change in elevation can not be stated as a specific psia change per a certain change in feet in elevation and also because the relative density of air in the atmosphere is affected greatly by temperature, humidity, wind, etc.

The one problem you might have if a watch was opened at a very high elevation is that there would be a greater pressure exerted on it once it is brought back to sea level that could make it hard to open there. But with a screw on case back , the relatively large hand wench used to remove it and the relative low differential pressure between the interior of the case acting on the approximately 1 square inch surface area of the case back, it would pose no problem.

I apologize again for the initial comments. My response should have been - I feel that the issue that you have raised would have extremely little or zero effect on the watch.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2008, 01:48 AM   #32
Lisa
"TRF" Member
 
Lisa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
Thank you, Vince. There are people like me whose minds work in very simple ways. I appreciate those of you who want to take the time to explain some of this. As for me, I'm still wondering about the lume thing.
Lisa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2008, 04:58 AM   #33
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lisa View Post
Thank you, Vince. There are people like me whose minds work in very simple ways. I appreciate those of you who want to take the time to explain some of this. As for me, I'm still wondering about the lume thing. Erm... can't we just talk about how do it know when to turn the lume on?

Sorry, that one is over my head.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2008, 11:08 AM   #34
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Thanks for the further explanation, Vince.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2008, 03:12 PM   #35
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by vjb.knife View Post
Please tell me that this question is also just being made as a humorous statement.
Which weighs most.

An atom of feathers or an atom of chicken.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 07:07 AM   #36
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
Neither ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Which weighs most.

An atom of feathers or an atom of chicken.
Neither the real answer is tuesday.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 09:57 AM   #37
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Which weighs most.

An atom of feathers or an atom of chicken.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vjb.knife View Post
Neither the real answer is tuesday.
I thought Monday weighed most heavily on the majority of the people who expressed a preference. Better say to be safe.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 02:08 PM   #38
RsqVet
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 142
also since you asked about the helium release valve --- it's need is due to the fact that saturation divers spend long times in compression chambers or divng bells pressurized with with a mixture of helium gas.

Helium being a very small molecule can pass around the O-rings, even on a rolex. This happens slowly.

Then the diver surfaces --- either wet or in the chamber much faster then the helium entered the watch and the pressure thus created INSIDE the watch can blow the crystal off it.

The one way valve eliminates this issue.

I have offten thought of pressurizing my SD in a helium filled chamber for a day or 2 just to see the valve open.... but to date have had better things to do.
RsqVet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 03:03 PM   #39
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Simple answer,

Water is much heavier than air.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 03:46 PM   #40
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-Sub View Post
Simple answer,

Water is much heavier than air.
So a pound of water is much heavier than a pound of air?

(If Vince is still following this thread he is going )
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 04:13 PM   #41
Z-Sub
2024 Pledge Member
 
Z-Sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art161 View Post
So a pound of water is much heavier than a pound of air?

(If Vince is still following this thread he is going )
Care to dispute that?
You dive 10feet in water that pressure should be felt on your ear drum. Maybe not yours.
you go up one flight, you think you'll feel the difference in pressure.
Yes I made it so simple and you can pick whatever you like.
trying to be a smart a..?
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z"
SS SeaDweller "D"
SS Submariner "Random"
TT Blue Submariner "P"
SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi
Pam 311, 524, 297
Z-Sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 05:06 PM   #42
Art161
"TRF" Member
 
Art161's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
IMHO, the serious part of the thread was finished at post #34, with the exception of post #38.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust
Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves.
Rolexers do it with perpetual movements.
Art161 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2008, 10:48 PM   #43
vjb.knife
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Vince
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Watch: Rolex Sub & GMTIIC
Posts: 626
Helium

Quote:
Originally Posted by RsqVet View Post
also since you asked about the helium release valve --- it's need is due to the fact that saturation divers spend long times in compression chambers or divng bells pressurized with with a mixture of helium gas.

Helium being a very small molecule can pass around the O-rings, even on a rolex. This happens slowly.

Then the diver surfaces --- either wet or in the chamber much faster then the helium entered the watch and the pressure thus created INSIDE the watch can blow the crystal off it.

The one way valve eliminates this issue.

I have offten thought of pressurizing my SD in a helium filled chamber for a day or 2 just to see the valve open.... but to date have had better things to do.
Divers do not ever surface in the water from Saturation Diving. This is done on the surface in the decompression section of the hyperbaric saturation system.

Don't waste you time trying to pressurize your watch with helium because even if you did you would never be able to see the HRV open when it decompressed the watch.
vjb.knife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 01:22 PM   #44
wuzzzer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHat View Post
Actually, there is no "legally" about it. Many posts about it. Do a search.

Also I have never heard your assertion regarding positive and negative pressure. The testing process as well documented as pulling a vacuum and assessing crystal deflection. Please tell us more about what you mean.

Edit: I pulled up one of the threads for you:
http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ght=Waterproof
Well, I don't have a scanner but here's the printed information I have directly from Rolex:

In a document titled "The Difference is Clear - Six Degrees of Rolex Separation Expanded"
"Pressure-proof (Waterproof)
Others: Can only claim water resistance. Cases are spot checked or batch tested for water leaking into the case.
Rolex: EVERY Rolex Oyster case is placed in a water environment. It is then positively and negatively pressure checked."

Also, in a booklet called "Talking Points" printed by Rolex:

"WATERPROOF TESTING

One of the factors that has contributed most to the international success of Rolex Oyster is its waterproof case. It is therefore vital to make sure that each watch offers a guaranteed level of protection.
To this effect, each watch is checked individually in actual conditions of use.
The watch is submerged in a tank of water in which the pressure is raised to a value exceeding the guaranteed water resistance depth. Rolex Oysters are guaranteed waterproof at depths of at least 100 meters/330 feet. The Submariner and Sea-Dweller models are guaranteed at depths of 300 meters/1,000 feet and 1,220 meters/4,000 feet respectively, thereby giving ever greater security to the diver."
wuzzzer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 September 2008, 04:32 PM   #45
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by wuzzzer View Post
Well, I don't have a scanner but here's the printed information I have directly from Rolex:

In a document titled "The Difference is Clear - Six Degrees of Rolex Separation Expanded"
"Pressure-proof (Waterproof)
Others: Can only claim water resistance. Cases are spot checked or batch tested for water leaking into the case.
Rolex: EVERY Rolex Oyster case is placed in a water environment. It is then positively and negatively pressure checked."

Also, in a booklet called "Talking Points" printed by Rolex:

"WATERPROOF TESTING

One of the factors that has contributed most to the international success of Rolex Oyster is its waterproof case. It is therefore vital to make sure that each watch offers a guaranteed level of protection.
To this effect, each watch is checked individually in actual conditions of use.
The watch is submerged in a tank of water in which the pressure is raised to a value exceeding the guaranteed water resistance depth. Rolex Oysters are guaranteed waterproof at depths of at least 100 meters/330 feet. The Submariner and Sea-Dweller models are guaranteed at depths of 300 meters/1,000 feet and 1,220 meters/4,000 feet respectively, thereby giving ever greater security to the diver."
This might sound dumb but if Rolex pressurises every diving watch to "a value exceeding the guaranteed water resistance depth" do they then take the back of to check if it has leaked - even a little bit? Then do they test it again and again ?
I can understand the method by where they pressurise the watch in air and then submerge it in water to check for air egress when the pressure is released but can't see how you could pressurise it under water and be sure it hadn't leaked without taking the back off?

As for deflection under a vacuum. What has vacuum testing got to do with pressure testing?

Can it be that:- "It held a vacuum therefore it must be resistant to 30 Bar, 120 or 390 Bar of water pressure"?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2008, 05:10 PM   #46
WaltherPPK
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art161 View Post
...

Also, my guess is that the watch probably is not air tight and that the pressure inside the watch equalizes to the ambient air pressure. I would think that an atom of water is bigger than an atom of helium.

Thanks!
No WAY! Water is an ATOM? Air is HELIUM? Things just got interesting!
WaltherPPK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.