The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 June 2017, 07:24 AM   #31
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockrolex View Post
Paul, I purchased my newest Rolex over 13 years ago and have yet to have any of them serviced (I have 4). I also keep them on winders when I'm not wearing them. Put that in your sock or underwear drawer and think on it.
Stay out of my underwear!!!!!!!


I too use a winder, personal choice but I think stuffing your watch in a drawer 40% of the time to reduce wear is ridiculous. Why not put it in a safety deposit box immediately after purchasing and never wear it; I'll bet it will last a long time
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 07:57 AM   #32
Rockrolex
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Rockrolex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy View Post
Stay out of my underwear!!!!!!!


I too use a winder, personal choice but I think stuffing your watch in a drawer 40% of the time to reduce wear is ridiculous. Why not put it in a safety deposit box immediately after purchasing and never wear it; I'll bet it will last a long time
I have no desire to get into your underwear. I have plenty of my own.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular.

Tosser Cabinet Member

Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019
Rockrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 08:40 AM   #33
cjohns
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Clark
Location: Ramsey Minnesota
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 954
I'm a simple thinking guy but isn't just like a car if you aren't driving, motor is off it's not wearing out ?? I'm I off base here ? I know all my machines I'm in charge of at work to keep them running don't break if they are not in use.....
__________________
GMT Master II
126300 41 White stick smooth
Explorer 39mm SOLD ,, 114060 SOLD
NIB Sub ND SOLD,,Shouldn't have!!!Crap!
cjohns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 08:59 AM   #34
breitlings
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjohns View Post
I'm a simple thinking guy but isn't just like a car if you aren't driving, motor is off it's not wearing out ?? I'm I off base here ? I know all my machines I'm in charge of at work to keep them running don't break if they are not in use.....
Well I am not sure if it is a good analogy but there are some issues from not running your engine for long periods of time and some serious car collectors do hire people to drive their car for a bit now and then to keep them up.

Also some engines don't like to stop and start, Newton's first law comes to mind... Not sure if either are applicable to watches but could see the argument.
breitlings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 08:59 AM   #35
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockrolex View Post
Paul, I purchased my newest Rolex over 13 years ago and have yet to have any of them serviced (I have 4). I also keep them on winders when I'm not wearing them. Put that in your sock or underwear drawer and think on it.
Very similar experience. I have used winders for many years and the last service I did on a Rolex...the watch was 15 years old. Have not serviced any of my current 6 watches and all run well and keep excellent time and all are on a winder when not on my wrist. One is a 50 year old 5513.
I have never had a Rolex break on me. Only reason I serviced the 15 year old piece is because the bezel insert got a pretty good ding in it and I wanted it replaced. Watch still kept good time.
__________________
Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today?
Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score.
Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers?
Ty: By height.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 12:15 PM   #36
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
I'm with Larry on this.

No movement - no wear.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 01:15 PM   #37
Tony64
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
I'm with Larry on this.

No movement - no wear.
I hate to drag this topic on, but respectfully I think Larry's example is an oversimplification.

Clearly a watch that is never worn will incur no "wear", but that's only a fair comparison if a watch is never to be worn. Otherwise we must consider the first law of physics: "an object at rest remains at rest, an object in motion remains in motion". A watch worn intermittently, once allowed to stop, must overcome inertia each time it's called into use. That requires an additional force applied to the mechanism that a watch on a winder would avoid.

Does that result in premature degradation of the movement vs a watch left on a winder? Who knows, and more importantly, who cares? The additional wear resulting from either winder or inertia is hardly significant enough to keep a watch unworn. Only an unworn watch incurs no wear, unless we're now going to discuss the process of natural corrosion and decay in the sock drawer vs the winder. Please, let's not.

tl/dr version: it's not science, it's preference.
Tony64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 01:35 PM   #38
wrist_watcher
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: United States
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 179
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
I'm with Larry on this.

No movement - no wear.
If wear concerns you, throw it in the sock drawer or the safe and call it a day!
wrist_watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 02:13 PM   #39
brkanand
2024 Pledge Member
 
brkanand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: DrK
Location: India
Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk
Posts: 7,052
I do not have a watch winder. Three out of four watches of mine stay idle for months - at times more than a year. I have not had a problem with any one of them. I pick up what I like to wear. I wear that for a couple of months. Set the time and wear it as if it was always sitting on my wrist. No problems whatsoever so far.
brkanand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 03:43 PM   #40
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
If you contend that having the watch running continuously causes wear that would not occur if it was stopped, then you must also acknowledge that winding and setting the watch every second day causes wear on the relevant parts that would not otherwise occur.
I have had problems with the Crown mechanism on both of my automatic watches that has required an RSC service and so I am keen to minimise the 'wear & tear' on this part of the mechanism.
This is not why I use a winder however. I use it because I'm not interested in winding and setting the watch every alternate day when I swap over.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 June 2017, 04:31 PM   #41
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrist_watcher View Post
If wear concerns you, throw it in the sock drawer or the safe and call it a day!
No, I just don't see the point in having my auto watches (30) all buzzing around on watch winders.

Could just be a Scottish thing.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.