ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 June 2017, 07:24 AM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
I too use a winder, personal choice but I think stuffing your watch in a drawer 40% of the time to reduce wear is ridiculous. Why not put it in a safety deposit box immediately after purchasing and never wear it; I'll bet it will last a long time |
|
27 June 2017, 07:57 AM | #32 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,970
|
Quote:
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
|
27 June 2017, 08:40 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Clark
Location: Ramsey Minnesota
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 954
|
I'm a simple thinking guy but isn't just like a car if you aren't driving, motor is off it's not wearing out ?? I'm I off base here ? I know all my machines I'm in charge of at work to keep them running don't break if they are not in use.....
__________________
GMT Master II 126300 41 White stick smooth Explorer 39mm SOLD ,, 114060 SOLD NIB Sub ND SOLD,,Shouldn't have!!!Crap! |
27 June 2017, 08:59 AM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,744
|
Quote:
Also some engines don't like to stop and start, Newton's first law comes to mind... Not sure if either are applicable to watches but could see the argument. |
|
27 June 2017, 08:59 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
Quote:
I have never had a Rolex break on me. Only reason I serviced the 15 year old piece is because the bezel insert got a pretty good ding in it and I wanted it replaced. Watch still kept good time.
__________________
Judge Smails: Ty, what did you shoot today? Ty: Oh, Judge, I don't keep score. Judge Smails: Then how do you measure yourself with other golfers? Ty: By height. |
|
27 June 2017, 12:15 PM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
I'm with Larry on this.
No movement - no wear.
__________________
E |
27 June 2017, 01:15 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 2,796
|
I hate to drag this topic on, but respectfully I think Larry's example is an oversimplification.
Clearly a watch that is never worn will incur no "wear", but that's only a fair comparison if a watch is never to be worn. Otherwise we must consider the first law of physics: "an object at rest remains at rest, an object in motion remains in motion". A watch worn intermittently, once allowed to stop, must overcome inertia each time it's called into use. That requires an additional force applied to the mechanism that a watch on a winder would avoid. Does that result in premature degradation of the movement vs a watch left on a winder? Who knows, and more importantly, who cares? The additional wear resulting from either winder or inertia is hardly significant enough to keep a watch unworn. Only an unworn watch incurs no wear, unless we're now going to discuss the process of natural corrosion and decay in the sock drawer vs the winder. Please, let's not. tl/dr version: it's not science, it's preference. |
27 June 2017, 01:35 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: United States
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 179
|
|
27 June 2017, 02:13 PM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: DrK
Location: India
Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk
Posts: 7,052
|
I do not have a watch winder. Three out of four watches of mine stay idle for months - at times more than a year. I have not had a problem with any one of them. I pick up what I like to wear. I wear that for a couple of months. Set the time and wear it as if it was always sitting on my wrist. No problems whatsoever so far.
|
27 June 2017, 03:43 PM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,850
|
If you contend that having the watch running continuously causes wear that would not occur if it was stopped, then you must also acknowledge that winding and setting the watch every second day causes wear on the relevant parts that would not otherwise occur.
I have had problems with the Crown mechanism on both of my automatic watches that has required an RSC service and so I am keen to minimise the 'wear & tear' on this part of the mechanism. This is not why I use a winder however. I use it because I'm not interested in winding and setting the watch every alternate day when I swap over.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
27 June 2017, 04:31 PM | #41 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
Quote:
Could just be a Scottish thing.
__________________
E |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.