ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 July 2017, 02:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 415
|
Royal Oak 15450ST durability vs Rolex 36 WG Day Date
I've heard that the bezels of the Royal Oaks can be scratch magnets but as compared to the Rolex they are steel as compared to the softer white gold, so I'm thinking the Day date may be just as bad or worse for showing signs of wear after day to day wearing over the course of years.
I understand the Day Date has more water resistance but I don't intend to swim or play tennis or golf with the watch on for that matter, so I'm thinking the 50m of the Royal Oak would be sufficient for hand washing, being in the rain, etc. Rolex are known for rock solid construction, are the issues with the crown and stem breaking on Royal Oaks not present in the newer movement of the 15450? Any thoughts on this comparison? Both have beautiful bracelets and the pre-owned market for the 18239 and 15450ST are similar. They both seem pretty versatile for wearing with polo and shorts up to a suit.... I have plenty of other watches (Rolex and Omega) that are more sporty and more casual but I guess I am looking to have a "main watch" or "grail watch" that I always want to reach for regardless of the day or what I am wearing and while I'm not intending to use it for spelunking, something durable enough to not look beat 5 years into ownership. |
29 July 2017, 02:57 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Armin
Location: USA
Posts: 533
|
I own a WG Daytona and a Royal Oak, the finish on AP's Royal Oak is in no way more prone to scratches compared to my WG Daytona. Since AP has a brushed look, you will not really see very fine scratches. With WG when you look at it under direct sun specially, there are hundreds of small tiny scratches similar to swirl marks on cars, that's because its a shiny finish.
|
29 July 2017, 03:22 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 415
|
Quote:
|
|
29 July 2017, 03:50 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: TX
Watch: iwatch
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
DD is the beater of the two. |
|
29 July 2017, 04:52 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Halifax, Canada
Posts: 415
|
What do you mean by that, "DD is the beater"? You think its the more durable watch overall or that its a beater (not as good) compared to the Royal Oak? I would think scratch for scratch a DD would have deeper scratches than the same scratches on a Royal oak as well the gold is just softer...
|
29 July 2017, 05:25 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
|
I used to have a daydate 118209 and hat one scratched much easier than any of my steel APs. Gold picks up hairlines from clothing.
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other… |
29 July 2017, 10:09 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 3,971
|
Rolex are scratch magnets... there's a thread in the Rolex section noting a guy that has his GMT all scratched up just from wearing his jacket.
My WG Daytona looked like it spent some time in a blender after a year of owning it. Both my APs are still in excellent condition.
__________________
"Best to stay silent and have the world think you're a fool than to speak and remove all doubt." SMD |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.