Specific Datejust 2 question, why doesn't it have glowing hands?

[Gerardus]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Someone swapped the dial, but didn't change the hands ...

or swapped the hands(for some reason)

[Lpugliese]

thats sucks big time. If in new jersey I would highly recommend Morre Lyons That would never happen [QUOTE=FreddyNJ;6062772]

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

If you buy at an AD and it ends up not right, you don't like it, you want it exchanged, they do it. You try other ways of getting the watch, you get the watch and service you paid for

And worse case senerio, you don't even like or want the watch, changed your mind, buyers remorse, they give you your money back


/QUOTE]

My AD in short hills nj would not let me exchange my explorer 3 days later. Absolutely no returns he said once sized and warranty card swiped. I was so pissed. Took a loss and traded plus cash for GMT two tone from one of our TRF trusted sellers.

[captainnice]

Originally Posted by reloxt

I really think these are the wrong hands. As far as I know, this dial should have hands with lume. The roman and the one with diamonds have hands without. Again, as far as I know.

[HogwldFLTR]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

Being new to Rolex, he may not know that AD means Authorized Dealer

And new to the forum, he may not be checking back having already gotten his answer. It could be all he needed from the forum. Sometimes it takes almost 10 posts before the addiction sets in.

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by kunlun

Dude, don't hound people on the forum.


Yeah, romans don't have hands with lume and dials get swapped all the time. Should be a free 20 minute fix from the dealer or at least not too big a deal elsewhere.

Please don't tell me what to do.

[MonBK]

Originally Posted by Tools

Make sure you are dealing with a reputable Dealer. A non-authorized Dealer can neither "send it back to Rolex" or "order it in" from Rolex. They are doing it in-house and likely changed the dial one-from-another for you. (or their non-Rolex source did).

As always Larry is right on the money and that's why I tried to get an answer.

[anothernewphone]

Originally Posted by MonBK

Please don't tell me what to do.

Not sure why you're getting so aggressive, but I agree - chill. Maybe he left his web browser on the page - it doesn't mean he's sitting there staring at the forum.

[FreddyNJ]

[QUOTE=Lpugliese;6063129]thats sucks big time. If in new jersey I would highly recommend Morre Lyons That would never happen Thank you
I stopped in there.....they don't take trades either. So I turned to our forums

[Rickehb]

I've been given a brand new replacement if anyone was interested to know the outcome.

[rolfiz]

I would have kept it... in 50 years someone would have paid $100 million US dollars for the one of kind Rolex error.

I mean, at least thats how it is with vintage Rolex watches currently. All you have to do is give it a stupid nickname like "fat lady" or "white ghost" in this case, maybe the "two handed blind man" datejust! one of a kind! $100K or best offer!

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by Rickehb

I've been given a brand new replacement if anyone was interested to know the outcome.

That's great! How about a pic?

[Phil t 32]

Originally Posted by rolfiz

I would have kept it... in 50 years someone would have paid $100 million US dollars for the one of kind Rolex error.

I mean, at least thats how it is with vintage Rolex watches currently. All you have to do is give it a stupid nickname like "fat lady" or "white ghost" in this case, maybe the "two handed blind man" datejust! one of a kind! $100K or best offer!

👏😄


After 30 years in the waiting.......GMT IIc

[Phil t 32]

Originally Posted by Rickehb

I've been given a brand new replacement if anyone was interested to know the outcome.

Thanks for posting, pleased for you 👍


After 30 years in the waiting.......GMT IIc

[Tbonewalk]

if this thread is still happening, I'd like to show you guys this one. I was concerned, looks like no lume on the hands. I am thinking of buying it and wondered if it was right or not... described as '97...