ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Alexcm123 · 22 January 2018, 02:06 PM

Hello, I just bought this item on eBay and before I pay I was wondering if someone here can help me out I’ve asked the seller for more pictures they should be comming in a day or two is this case assembly real or fake, I’m new to these watches and I need help on this one.

Thanks Much

https://m.ebay.com/itm/RAREST-EX-Vin...app-cvip-panel

JZD · 22 January 2018, 02:09 PM

Link didn’t work. And why would you buy it if you were not sure if it was real?

Alexcm123 · 22 January 2018, 03:37 PM

Try link again and click on auction title should bring up pictures . Here’s a direct link to my photo bucket where I saved the pictures.

http://s1302.photobucket.com/user/fastgti352/library/

Thanks

Greatwatch1 · 22 January 2018, 06:57 PM

looks ok to me

Alexcm123 · 23 January 2018, 06:59 AM

Ok, any other opinions I’m going to be paying soon. Does the dial look real, why is there a dot of lume near the Tudor name?

alwayshere · 31 January 2018, 01:45 PM

think case looks okay but dial is aftermarket

Kingface66 · 31 January 2018, 02:03 PM

Gotta ask, especially with that splotch of, what looks like, lume on that dubious dial, why did you buy it?

VintageVagabound · 31 January 2018, 03:54 PM

The VI.66 dial should be T Swiss T and since this dial doesn't belong to the case you should be able to back out of the deal. It's too much money for what will end up being a frankenwatch. You'll still need the proper crown, 390 movement, and hands.

alwayshere · 1 February 2018, 10:48 AM

also 400XXX serials belong to c. 1963 tudor so caseback is not correct either.

You can tell its a 1963 because its PCG which is arguably more desirable than the later models.

22 January 2018, 02:06 PM	#1
Alexcm123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Alex Location: Arizona Watch: Tudor Submariner Posts: 101	7928 Submariner Case Real Or Fake Hello, I just bought this item on eBay and before I pay I was wondering if someone here can help me out I’ve asked the seller for more pictures they should be comming in a day or two is this case assembly real or fake, I’m new to these watches and I need help on this one. Thanks Much https://m.ebay.com/itm/RAREST-EX-Vin...app-cvip-panel

22 January 2018, 02:09 PM	#2
JZD "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 106	Link didn’t work. And why would you buy it if you were not sure if it was real?

22 January 2018, 03:37 PM	#3
Alexcm123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Alex Location: Arizona Watch: Tudor Submariner Posts: 101	Try link again and click on auction title should bring up pictures . Here’s a direct link to my photo bucket where I saved the pictures. http://s1302.photobucket.com/user/fastgti352/library/ Thanks

22 January 2018, 06:57 PM	#4
Greatwatch1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Location: Uk Posts: 11	looks ok to me

23 January 2018, 06:59 AM	#5
Alexcm123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Alex Location: Arizona Watch: Tudor Submariner Posts: 101	Ok, any other opinions I’m going to be paying soon. Does the dial look real, why is there a dot of lume near the Tudor name?

31 January 2018, 01:45 PM	#6
alwayshere "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 1,562	think case looks okay but dial is aftermarket

31 January 2018, 02:03 PM	#7
Kingface66 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: The Empire State Watch: Many Posts: 3,462	Gotta ask, especially with that splotch of, what looks like, lume on that dubious dial, why did you buy it?

31 January 2018, 03:54 PM	#8
VintageVagabound "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Washington, DC Posts: 568	The VI.66 dial should be T Swiss T and since this dial doesn't belong to the case you should be able to back out of the deal. It's too much money for what will end up being a frankenwatch. You'll still need the proper crown, 390 movement, and hands.

1 February 2018, 10:48 AM	#9
alwayshere "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 1,562	also 400XXX serials belong to c. 1963 tudor so caseback is not correct either. You can tell its a 1963 because its PCG which is arguably more desirable than the later models.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)