ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 April 2009, 04:24 AM | #31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on Earth
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,284
|
Quote:
Teasing aside, when comparing my date-just to my sea-dweller, my date just feels more secure and solid on my wrist. And we all know how well the sea-dweller stands the test of time and having such a rep of being a rugged in almost all wearing condition. |
|
22 April 2009, 04:27 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
|
I owned a DJ with the newer style jubilee bracelet and found it to be far more comfortable on the wrist than the older one, primarily because of the clasp area. Also, the hidden clasp just looks so much better, IMO.
__________________
RTFT - Read The Friggin' Thread FcB |
22 April 2009, 04:32 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
will any jubilee bracelet fit the GMT IIC?
|
22 April 2009, 04:35 AM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Don't think so.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
22 April 2009, 04:36 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
too bad . . . but thanks for the info!
|
22 April 2009, 04:58 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: TN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,166
|
does the gmtii c have 21mm lug spacing or am i making things up in my head again??
__________________
Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46 Omega Speedmaster Racing Panerai PAM390 |
22 April 2009, 05:00 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 599
|
The new bracelets are king.
|
22 April 2009, 05:01 AM | #38 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
22 April 2009, 05:32 AM | #39 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Correct!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
22 April 2009, 09:40 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: TN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,166
|
__________________
Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46 Omega Speedmaster Racing Panerai PAM390 |
22 April 2009, 09:52 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Memphis
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 40
|
the newer ones are definitely better. my dad has had rolex for about 20 years and you can definitely see the stretch in the band. how the new ones will look in 20 years is still anybody's guess, but i'd like to think it wouldn't be as bad
__________________
|
22 April 2009, 11:19 AM | #42 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 179
|
Quote:
Permanent "stretching" would require plastic deformation of the steel links, and a wristwatch bracelet won't see forces anywhere close to that. The springbars would fail first. The same thing happens with drive chains, like the chain on a bicycle. They appear to "stretch," but it's actually just erosion of the rollers - not elongation of the links. |
|
22 April 2009, 11:36 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 593
|
Agree that the new Jubilee bracelet is more solid, and probably looks better with the hidden clasp. But in the case of my P series Datejust, I think the watch itself looks better with it's brushed tapered lugs than the new Datejust with the wider mirror lugs. And that older style Datejust has the older hollow Jubilee links with the older clasp. But I'd still take mine over the current model.
|
22 April 2009, 09:56 PM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
Great bracelet I have one, the only problems I have had is the bracelet can not be micro adjusted to get a perfect fit and sometimes the bracelet has a tendency to unclip itself so I tend to wear my DJ less. Before you all jump in I live within a few minutes walk of St James Square which is the UK service centre and they have informed me that both problems exist in the bracelet.
|
23 April 2009, 04:38 AM | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Hermann
Location: Middle of Europe
Watch: 16710/3185 16613 B
Posts: 413
|
Quote:
??? that would be a move to the worse! What does Rolex, Geneve, say to this? Would like to have this sorted out, as one day I´m gonna have a Super Jubilée! Hermann |
|
23 April 2009, 06:09 AM | #46 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
23 April 2009, 10:12 AM | #47 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
Due to the nature of my work I wear my watch pretty tight to my wrist with little slack but enough to place your little between gap. sometime when I snap my wrist the bracelet flips open! Don't get me wrong the watch is not tight on my wrist. I prefer the oyster bracelet with the lock in all fairness but prefer the look of the jubilee. I have taken the watch back on several occasions to no avail.
|
23 April 2009, 10:17 AM | #48 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Quote:
That would bother me too. But I wear mine on the snug side and I'm always amazed how secure the "click" is. The last thing you want is for the bracelet to open on it's own. dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
23 April 2009, 10:19 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
Sorry little FINGER lol! It's getting late and I am on call so I will try to get a little shut eye. Ps a few of my work colleagues have DJ's and they have the same problem.
|
23 April 2009, 10:53 AM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: on Earth
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 1,284
|
Quote:
Maybe Rolex is sending all the good stuff to the U.S.? LOL |
|
10 March 2018, 08:14 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Algarve
Watch: Torn between a few
Posts: 48
|
Using this thread to post a question...
The other day saw a person wanting to add some links to a Jubilee Bracelet with hollow links... since the new ones are solid, can this be done? Won't it unbalance the bracelet? |
11 March 2018, 02:15 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Paul
Location: Southern Virginia
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 2,544
|
I think that would be a silly thing to do. Yes MUCH lighter links
|
11 March 2018, 02:31 AM | #53 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NYC
Posts: 283
|
Obv newer is better... esp with rolex
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.