The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 May 2018, 03:01 AM   #1
tschiemer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
Sea Dweller 4000 years of production?

I have a chance to buy a new Sea Dweller 4000 from my dealer today; what were its years of production? This watch, from what I know is popular, with a 40 mm size, and trying it on, it was not a lot different from my GMT BLNR -- in its size -- but for its weight and you know it is there. Dealer says this watch is hard to get. Opinions about them from those of you who own one? Robert
tschiemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:01 AM   #2
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
2014-early 2017

Brand New & stickered at MSRP or 'new' and priced at a premium?
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:07 AM   #3
tschiemer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
Here is a quick pic I took... brand new w warranty card to be in my name...

https://photos.app.goo.gl/b3Qv741cTMpUtHTm1
tschiemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:09 AM   #4
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Here's an opinion, I feel it is the best dive watch ever made by Rolex. It maintains traditional profile yet has all the upgrades that Rolex has made over the years. On top of that it had a very limited run making it collectable. I love mine and I'm very happy to have one on my wrist.

__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:11 AM   #5
glamorama
"TRF" Member
 
glamorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Dan
Location: Benelux
Posts: 1,920
Brand new at MSRP? Get it! It is a great dive watch.
glamorama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:11 AM   #6
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by tschiemer View Post
Here is a quick pic I took... brand new w warranty card to be in my name...

https://photos.app.goo.gl/b3Qv741cTMpUtHTm1
Well, that's a 43mm Sea-Dweller, not the 40mm. It's still technically a Sea-Dweller 4000 but was just released in 2017 and is still in production. That's different than the discontinued 40mm model.

Nice watch no less. Buy it if you like it.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:12 AM   #7
Jinson
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: Older GMTs & Subs
Posts: 565
It's a great alternative to the submariner with date ... and the 40 mm size is ideal.
Jinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:12 AM   #8
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Lol that's the 126600 at 43mm

'with a 40 mm size, and trying it on, it was not a lot different from my GMT BLNR -- in its size'. Did you have a couple drinks prior to going in?

Why do so many people think this is the old model?
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:13 AM   #9
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by tschiemer View Post
Sea Dweller 4000 years of production?

its less than 4000 years i can assure you
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:14 AM   #10
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
Why do so many people think this is the old model?
Sea-Dweller 4000 != Sea-Dweller 4000. It's kinda confusing, really.



(Seriously, I don't know. They don't even look the same in person.)
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:17 AM   #11
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
Sea-Dweller 4000 != Sea-Dweller 4000. It's kinda confusing, really.



(Seriously, I don't know. They don't even look the same in person.)
Yeah I mean look, it's not as if one is massively larger, has red text and a cyclops to differentiate it

I'm also confused at how the OP claimed it wasn't any different in size from his GMT2

dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:25 AM   #12
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
I'm also confused at how the OP claimed it wasn't any different in size from his GMT2
Good question. My GMT2 looks bigger on my wrist than the SD4K. Maybe the slimmer lugs on the 43 threw him?

Side-by-side there's a massive difference. The photo you found is a great example.
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:32 AM   #13
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
Well, that's a 43mm Sea-Dweller, not the 40mm. It's still technically a Sea-Dweller 4000 but was just released in 2017 and is still in production. That's different than the discontinued 40mm model.

Nice watch no less. Buy it if you like it.
That is pretty funny!!! I'd certainly notice the difference if it were on my 6.5 inch wrist!!! Sorry OP (Tshiemer) but it's (SD43) not close to the GMT either.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:36 AM   #14
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by 037 View Post
Good question. My GMT2 looks bigger on my wrist than the SD4K. Maybe the slimmer lugs on the 43 threw him?

Side-by-side there's a massive difference. The photo you found is a great example.
Yeah, not sure, as I stated above, perhaps he had a few at the bar around the corner before going in . Regardless, it's still a nice watch. I'd honestly consider a SD43 if it had all white text. I'm just a monochrome guy and think red letters look 'gimmicky'. It's large, but would be a great weekend watch IMO. 40mm is better for daily wear.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 03:41 AM   #15
tac34vt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northeast, USA
Watch: GMT2-DJ2-SubC-SD43
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
its less than 4000 years i can assure you

Arghhh, you beat me to it!!
tac34vt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 04:46 AM   #16
lord91
"TRF" Member
 
lord91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Bucuresti
Watch: a Rolex duo
Posts: 1,992
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
its less than 4000 years i can assure you
Maybe Rolex has bold plans for it.
lord91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 05:14 AM   #17
tschiemer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
126600 !

Wow I bought it and have a 126600! A modern Seadweller. Very comfortable and a good opportunity.
tschiemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 05:36 AM   #18
Boaters
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
Yeah I mean look, it's not as if one is massively larger, has red text and a cyclops to differentiate it

I'm also confused at how the OP claimed it wasn't any different in size from his GMT2

Great shot to show size difference.
Boaters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 06:53 AM   #19
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by tschiemer View Post
Wow I bought it and have a 126600! A modern Seadweller. Very comfortable and a good opportunity.
Does it still feel like a 40mm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boaters View Post
Great shot to show size difference.
It’s a big difference for sure
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 07:12 AM   #20
tschiemer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
If you are not looking at it, the width of the watch does feel subjectively like about a 40mm; surprisingly the extra 3 mm is not that great of a difference. It is much less than the 45 mm Grand Ocean Omega or whatever it was years ago I tried briefly. Looking at it side-by-side to the two ceramic GMTs alternated, sure it is larger, but subjectively (disregarding the heavier weight) the extra 43 mm is not uncomfortable subjectively. Robert
tschiemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 07:15 AM   #21
037
2024 Pledge Member
 
037's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
The tapered lugs certainly help. Congrats on the purchase! You certainly entertained us here and yourself with a new watch!
037 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 07:15 AM   #22
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by tschiemer View Post
If you are not looking at it, the width of the watch does feel subjectively like about a 40mm; surprisingly the extra 3 mm is not that great of a difference. It is much less than the 45 mm Grand Ocean Omega or whatever it was years ago I tried briefly. Looking at it side-by-side to the two ceramic GMTs alternated, sure it is larger, but subjectively (disregarding the heavier weight) the extra 43 mm is not uncomfortable subjectively. Robert
I’m only poking fun at you Rob, enjoy your new timepiece!!
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 07:19 AM   #23
tschiemer
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tschiemer
Location: arkansas
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG 1962
Posts: 279
Thanks right now I only have the two GMT ceramics and have had many subs in years past...and all the new ceramics seem much more robust ... in feel. Really this board teachestremendously about watches ... thank you
tschiemer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 07:22 AM   #24
marcotagudelo
"TRF" Member
 
marcotagudelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
Love the SD4k...will never let it go.
if it sings to you grab it!!
marcotagudelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 09:52 AM   #25
belutak
"TRF" Member
 
belutak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: planet earth
Watch: Variety
Posts: 353
Which Sea Dweller 4000 was in production until 2008 then? I thought I saw one 5 digit one in pawn shop, year of production 2004 and immaculate looking. They are asking USD 6000 for it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
belutak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 10:15 AM   #26
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by belutak View Post
Which Sea Dweller 4000 was in production until 2008 then? I thought I saw one 5 digit one in pawn shop, year of production 2004 and immaculate looking. They are asking USD 6000 for it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There's been multiple variations of the Sea Dweller.....that's the 16600. There was none from ~2008-2014
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 10:35 AM   #27
jps3b
"TRF" Member
 
jps3b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Watch: 116619
Posts: 1,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by tschiemer View Post
Here is a quick pic I took... brand new w warranty card to be in my name...

https://photos.app.goo.gl/b3Qv741cTMpUtHTm1


jps3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 10:47 AM   #28
belutak
"TRF" Member
 
belutak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: planet earth
Watch: Variety
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
There's been multiple variations of the Sea Dweller.....that's the 16600. There was none from ~2008-2014


What is the general view on 16600 variant?
Are they any desirable?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
belutak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 11:12 AM   #29
ac_eddings
"TRF" Member
 
ac_eddings's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 67
Get it! I bought my SD4k brand new two weeks ago from my AD. There aren’t many left out there at AD’s; especially at MSRP! Fantastic watch and has potential to be worth quite a bit one day!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ac_eddings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2018, 11:25 AM   #30
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by ac_eddings View Post
Get it! I bought my SD4k brand new two weeks ago from my AD. There aren’t many left out there at AD’s; especially at MSRP! Fantastic watch and has potential to be worth quite a bit one day!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do people ever read past the 1st post?
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.