ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Verdi · 8 August 2018, 06:54 PM

Explorer for sure

Rolex fan 61 · 8 August 2018, 10:17 PM

2016 39mm Mk2 explorer - beautiful

northshorechrono · 8 August 2018, 10:39 PM

Explorer all day long!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

joe100 · 9 August 2018, 12:34 AM

The Explorer by a mile. The railmaster is nice, but that new denim edition marketing campaign is patronizing and really put me off.

fskywalker · 9 August 2018, 05:18 AM

Railmaster in 36mm is an awesome choice, but my vote would go to the explorer 1 (in 36mm size as well). If you are considering the 39mm size them would say the Railmaster as dont like 214270 proportions

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Cheapside Genie · 13 August 2018, 07:02 PM

What did you decide AQBill?

JeremyS · 13 August 2018, 07:13 PM

I think it’s a tough choice. The Omega is a lovely little watch with a great movement. If there’s one over the other that calls to you—go with that one. However, with all the hoopla over getting a stainless Rolex sports watch these days, I’d almost go for the Omega.

Ckci · 13 August 2018, 07:49 PM

Name: 9B2EB5F2-E06F-421D-BF2C-85B8710C9DC8.jpeg
Views: 139
Size: 253.9 KB

1William · 13 August 2018, 08:54 PM

I am a Railmaster fan but Rolex hands down on this one.

brandrea · 13 August 2018, 08:57 PM

Welcome

I’d buy the Explorer, the Omega doesn’t do anything for me.

ras47 · 14 August 2018, 02:38 AM

And on a tangental note, why can't the new Air King use the same numbers as on the Explorer? Why all silver instead of luminous and silver-outlined?

Stalex · 14 August 2018, 03:02 AM

I would go for the Explorer.

Explorer-P · 14 August 2018, 05:52 AM

Definitely Explorer. It’s just about perfect.

173rdabn · 14 August 2018, 06:04 AM

Explorer 1 without any hesitation. I've owned 3 over the years, great watch.

AQBill · 14 August 2018, 07:56 AM

Well, the choice has been made and I have purchased - but have yet to receive - a previously loved, 2005-vintage Rolex Explorer 114270. I'll post a picture as soon as it comes in. I still can't believe I spent that much on a watch but if it gives me as much pleasure as the rest of my decidedly small and motley collection, then I shall consider it money well spent.

A good friend of mine reminded me that I'll soon be celebrating the 20th-anniversary of my first, and hopefully last, heart attack. I've had many adventures both big and small since that fateful day and I'm sure that I can do another 20 with a Rolex!

AQBill

Beckster · 14 August 2018, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AQBill

Well, the choice has been made and I have purchased - but have yet to receive - a previously loved, 2005-vintage Rolex Explorer 114270. I'll post a picture as soon as it comes in. I still can't believe I spent that much on a watch but if it gives me as much pleasure as the rest of my decidedly small and motley collection, then I shall consider it money well spent.

A good friend of mine reminded me that I'll soon be celebrating the 20th-anniversary of my first, and hopefully last, heart attack. I've had many adventures both big and small since that fateful day and I'm sure that I can do another 20 with a Rolex!

AQBill

Congrats. Sure hope you enjoy the watch in good health for the next 20 years and more!

judson · 14 August 2018, 08:16 AM

I went to the Omega boutique yesterday specifically to look at the Railmasters. The 60th anniversary Railmaster does not have a screw down crown, which turned me off. The dial and case are nice, the size appropriate.

The standard black dial Railmaster had a stunning dial and does have a screw down crown. The dial is large at 40mm, and it is all dial. You have to see the dial in person to see the way it changes in the light, much more interesting than the Explorer dial. The case is completely brushed which makes it more low key.

I own an Explorer 39 MK1 and at this point I still prefer it. I think the Omega 300 MC is a better comparison, I own it as well. If I had to choose between the 300 MC and an Explorer it would be a much harder choice.

Pauln · 14 August 2018, 08:28 AM

I considered the same two watches. I picked the explorer and would do so again.

8 August 2018, 06:54 PM	#1
Verdi "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mitch Location: UAE Watch: Big Ben Posts: 2,451	Explorer for sure __________________ IG: @watch_idiot_savant

9 August 2018, 12:34 AM	#4
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,840	The Explorer by a mile. The railmaster is nice, but that new denim edition marketing campaign is patronizing and really put me off. __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

9 August 2018, 05:18 AM	#5
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,180	Recommendation: Explorer or Omega RailMaster Railmaster in 36mm is an awesome choice, but my vote would go to the explorer 1 (in 36mm size as well). If you are considering the 39mm size them would say the Railmaster as dont like 214270 proportions Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

13 August 2018, 07:02 PM	#6
Cheapside Genie "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: London Posts: 195	What did you decide AQBill? __________________ ♛ 226627 Titanium YM, 116519LN WG Daytona Silver/Black Dial, 126711CHNR GMT II, 126710BLRO GMT II Oyster bracelet, 124060 Submariner, 214270 Explorer I Mk 2

14 August 2018, 02:38 AM	#11
ras47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Real Name: Robert Location: Northern NJ Watch: 16710 BLRO Posts: 3,064	And on a tangental note, why can't the new Air King use the same numbers as on the Explorer? Why all silver instead of luminous and silver-outlined? __________________ Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono

8 August 2018, 10:17 PM	#2
Rolex fan 61 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: UK Posts: 1,262	2016 39mm Mk2 explorer - beautiful

8 August 2018, 10:39 PM	#3
northshorechrono "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: Chicago Watch: 16520, Black Dial Posts: 40	Explorer all day long! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

13 August 2018, 07:13 PM	#7
JeremyS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Norfolk, VA Posts: 273	I think it’s a tough choice. The Omega is a lovely little watch with a great movement. If there’s one over the other that calls to you—go with that one. However, with all the hoopla over getting a stainless Rolex sports watch these days, I’d almost go for the Omega.

13 August 2018, 07:49 PM	#8
Ckci "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2015 Real Name: Russell Location: KC, MO Watch: FedEx 4 next 1 Posts: 2,244

13 August 2018, 08:54 PM	#9
1William 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex/Others Posts: 47,775	I am a Railmaster fan but Rolex hands down on this one.

13 August 2018, 08:57 PM	#10
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,082	Welcome I’d buy the Explorer, the Omega doesn’t do anything for me.

14 August 2018, 03:02 AM	#12
Stalex Banned Join Date: May 2018 Location: USA, Netherland Watch: Rolex 116710 Posts: 104	I would go for the Explorer.

14 August 2018, 05:52 AM	#13
Explorer-P "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2018 Location: Glasgow Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 36	Definitely Explorer. It’s just about perfect.

14 August 2018, 06:04 AM	#14
173rdabn 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: George Location: Cape Cod Watch: 216570 Explorer II Posts: 2,421	Explorer 1 without any hesitation. I've owned 3 over the years, great watch.

14 August 2018, 07:56 AM	#15
AQBill "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2018 Location: Sheffield, AL USA Posts: 35	The Envelope Please... Well, the choice has been made and I have purchased - but have yet to receive - a previously loved, 2005-vintage Rolex Explorer 114270. I'll post a picture as soon as it comes in. I still can't believe I spent that much on a watch but if it gives me as much pleasure as the rest of my decidedly small and motley collection, then I shall consider it money well spent. A good friend of mine reminded me that I'll soon be celebrating the 20th-anniversary of my first, and hopefully last, heart attack. I've had many adventures both big and small since that fateful day and I'm sure that I can do another 20 with a Rolex! AQBill

14 August 2018, 08:16 AM	#17
judson "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: USA Watch: changes depending Posts: 800	I went to the Omega boutique yesterday specifically to look at the Railmasters. The 60th anniversary Railmaster does not have a screw down crown, which turned me off. The dial and case are nice, the size appropriate. The standard black dial Railmaster had a stunning dial and does have a screw down crown. The dial is large at 40mm, and it is all dial. You have to see the dial in person to see the way it changes in the light, much more interesting than the Explorer dial. The case is completely brushed which makes it more low key. I own an Explorer 39 MK1 and at this point I still prefer it. I think the Omega 300 MC is a better comparison, I own it as well. If I had to choose between the 300 MC and an Explorer it would be a much harder choice.

14 August 2018, 08:28 AM	#18
Pauln "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Paul Location: Colorado Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,543	I considered the same two watches. I picked the explorer and would do so again.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)