ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 October 2018, 11:37 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 167
|
Help with Tudor
Hi guys,
I can’t find any info on the website so I’m asking for some help with the following info please. I’d like to know the thickness of the following pieces: Black bay 41 Black bay 58 Any info would be greatly appreciated! Thanks |
3 October 2018, 11:40 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,973
|
From memory 58 is slim at 12mm and thats 2.5 to 3mm thinner than the 41
I own both. 58 is very noticeably slimmer. |
3 October 2018, 11:41 PM | #3 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
|
In the neighborhood of 15 vs 12
|
4 October 2018, 12:37 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: Rolex/Tudor/PAM
Posts: 1,272
|
If you are referring to the Black Bay 41 without the diver bezel, I believe it is 11.2mm thick.
|
4 October 2018, 12:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
BB 41 in-house: just under 15mm
BB 41 Rose: 12.5mm BB 58: 11.9mm
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy |
4 October 2018, 02:49 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,172
|
Black Bay 41 'eta' is 12.6 mm, sorry thats all I know.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
4 October 2018, 03:05 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
try them on at the AD
|
4 October 2018, 04:01 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
58 materially slimmer
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.