ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 November 2018, 02:59 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
|
Opinion on this sub bezel
Hi all. Would be grateful for help with:
1) what mark/era this is/would be correct for; and 2) an assessment of its condition (has it been artificially distressed etc). Thanks. Last edited by HectorM; 3 November 2018 at 03:42 AM.. Reason: Additional photo. |
3 November 2018, 04:50 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Watch: where do i start??
Posts: 3,254
|
Quote:
hard to say what has been artificially aged today and what hasn't. the inserts fade looks natural to me. See if you can get a picture of the back, as dipped inserts that have been artificially faded will have a faded back as well. When in reality, the back should stay solid black as it is not exposed to UV. |
|
3 November 2018, 05:29 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1,175
|
Thanks for the above info^ SubKing! I have been worried about all 'ghost' bezels these days as the after market fade is all to popular :(
|
3 November 2018, 05:43 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
So is it widely accepted that it’s the combo of UV and salt water that bleached the bezels or is it one of those things that just... happens to certain examples and doesn’t to others? |
|
3 November 2018, 06:15 AM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Florida
Posts: 278
|
Quote:
|
|
3 November 2018, 08:36 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
And if the back isn’t a fail safe, what’s the methodology for determining interference? |
|
3 November 2018, 09:04 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
While the photos presented in this thread are not the best quality, the dial appears to have been artificially aged. Look at the uneven edges on the top right where the edge was masked with tape or something and the color there is still black or the insert was left in the bezel when it was altered. Notice the nicks which are still black. In the photos below there is also evidence of a chemical alteration line observed in photo 2 highlighted by the arrow on the left and also the same alteration line in photo 4.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
3 November 2018, 09:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
Isn’t the pip also too large?
|
3 November 2018, 09:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Europe
Posts: 386
|
I think you're right springer , good eyes. You keep surprising me with your knowledge. What a shame.
It surely doesnt belong in my ghost/faded bezel only thread
__________________
"You will have your chance to speak in the question period madame" A. WATTS |
4 November 2018, 12:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Posts: 31
|
Thanks, springer. Sharp eyes indeed.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.