ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 December 2008, 10:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
The wait is over
First let me say how funny things work out. Over the course of the year I've sold six watches in an effort to consolidate my collection. Within the last month I've added four back. So much for that.
Yesterday my AD called. My DSSD came in. Over the last 24 hours I've worn the watch and would like to share my initial impressions with you about a reference that seems to evoke strong emotions one way or the other. First let me introduce the newest member of the clan. The DSSD reference 116660 V serial number, As some of you know the name "DEEP SEA" is not new to the history of Rolex. Indeed in the 60s Rolex made a special set of prototypes bearing the name, at least one of which was strapped to the outside of the bathosphere TRIESTE when it made it's recording breaking dive to over 35,000 feet. Complete details are contained herein--CREDIT BJSONLINE http://www.bjsonline.com/watches/articles/0022.shtml Much has been written about the size of the DSSD. It is certainly a big watch, but to be honest I've worn watches as heavy or heavier than the DS, the Planet Ocean is one that comes to mind. Those who favor the PANERAI might find the size of the DSSD "normal" while I certainly understand those used to the more traditional Rolex offerings will "feel" the difference. I've found one adapts quickly to the DSs added heft and thickness. (Though I grant going under some shirt cuffs might be exciting) I have found that as with most watches proper sizing cures all and with the addition of the glidelock clasp a nice fit is easily obtained. What I did. At the ADs I asked the diver's extention be removed. This piece appears to be about 2 links worth and rather than remove some of the screw links and risk the watch leaning to one side or the other I took this route and was completely satisfied. My watchmaker came out, tools in hand, and did the job, even applying a new drop of locktite to the screw. The divers extention, With the help of the glidelock, I was able to get a great fit on my 6 3/4 inch wrist. As some have mentioned the bracelet, upon first glance seemed "underpowered" compared to the heft of the DS case, but that quickly went away when the watch was put on. The bezel is EVERYTHING I have read. Still possessed of 120 clicks this one is by far the smoothest working system I have ever used. Kudos to Rolex for this one. I also like the fact that it harkens back to select Mil subs with it's 60 graduations as opposed to the more familiar first 15 minutes. Much has been written about the lume (or lack thereof) of Rolex timepieces. I must admit the blue is nice and very easy to read in less than ideal conditions. Interestingly it seems Rolex has at least acknowledged the shot commings their lume has had. I'll have to study furthur to see if longevity is enhanced. Interestingly this is subject that has been addressed, http://forums.timezone.com/index.php...=4129915&rid=0 My sad attempt, and a comparison with the traditional green, To the collector a domed crystal is a thing of beauty and the DSSD certainly pays hommage to the days of old, As with Dwellers of the past the caseback continues the legend albiet with the addition of titanium, The box is a bit bigger, it has a seperate hangtag for the glidelock and a bezel protector that can double as a hula hoop. Pricing is a big issue with the reference as well as practically. You'll get no arguement as to the cost, but that is an issue each of us has to answer for ourselves. For me, and my relationship with my AD I'm happy. Practicality...again a question each of us must answer. For me the engineering of the watch, it's links to a bygone era, and the fact it's a watch I can reasonably wear ...a lot make it fine for me. As always the case each will view it through different eyes. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.