26331st vs. Daytona

[soundserious]

Don’t like the small 6 o’clock subdial on the AP. Strange design choice.

[Deityjazz]

AP are nicer in terms of fit and finish but Rolex are more robust and reliable. However, both can coexist nicely in any collection. If I were forced to choose one, I would choose the AP

[MrBigSmiles]

Originally Posted by christopheran

The Daytona can’t compete with the ROC, and I have both. I prefer the wrist presence of the AP as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The ROC has prominence on any wrist. The Daytona certainly stands out but I think the AP is the winner here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Xerxes77]

Originally Posted by AK797

Maybe the new Code Red, coz you can't handle the truth, is a better comparison now, no real bezel to damage, inhouse and longer PR.

The new ROCs are better finished, and have more dial combos, esp if you like blue they have nailed it with contrasting silver subdials, but it does wear wide, more like a 42/3mm, as opposed to the 38/9mm feel of the Daytona, which with its smaller size and CE you can wear anywhere at any time.

You have right with ROC 38mm.
I speake yesterday with my AP AD and he tell me the new ROC 38mm it’s like 39-39,5mm.
So I think can be a true competition btw this two.
IMO AP win this time.

[Bearxj86]

With a rubber strap option for the 26331st ROC; I think it edges out the daytona.

[AK797]

Originally Posted by MrBigSmiles

The ROC has prominence on any wrist. The Daytona certainly stands out but I think the AP is the winner here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I find the Rolex is a great even beautiful watch... until you try on the AP or PP... then it goes to being more a good and rock solid watch.

[mickyd329]

AP in this case. Daytona is nice and I'm waiting for my white dial ceramic, but AP is on another level. Wrist presence and finishing can't be matched by Rolex.