ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

andrewjoo7 · 17 January 2019, 09:49 AM

Hey guys i currently have a 15400st silver and a rolex sub 116610ln

Ive been looking around and in love with the ROO ceramic.

Would you change both for the ROO ceramic as an only watch?
Im very tempted

lhawli · 17 January 2019, 09:53 AM

If you are tempted go for it. None of the watches you have can’t be obtained easily for reasonable prices.

ROO is a large watch and may want to consider versatility of owning only 1.

Personally I’m not a fan and would stick with the 2 you have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

masterserg · 17 January 2019, 10:00 AM

44 full ceramic, 44 ceramic bezel or 42 ceramic bezel? 44 full ceramic likely yes. Other options, I would not.

singe89 · 17 January 2019, 10:34 AM

Are those your only two watches? Its a good combo of daily beater sub and nicer SS dressy sport watch.

However..the 44mm ROO Ce is an amazing watch!

It will wear much larger than either of your current watches. As long as it fits and it sings to you more than the other two I would 100% do it. The anthracite Ce is one of my all time favorite ROOs.

GB-man · 17 January 2019, 10:58 AM

Having owned all three. Yes absolutely.

Ar_Mi · 17 January 2019, 12:25 PM

IMHO I think any collection that includes APs would be incomplete without some sort of RO model in it.

sokoloka · 17 January 2019, 03:35 PM

Absolutely would. Stopped wearing my other watches after I picked up my first 44 ROO, ended up with a second one within 30 days of buying the first and am now looking to pick up a third in the next few months.

Friggen LOVE the watch.

Helmi · 18 January 2019, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhawli

If you are tempted go for it. None of the watches you have can’t be obtained easily for reasonable prices.

ROO is a large watch and may want to consider versatility of owning only 1.

Personally I’m not a fan and would stick with the 2 you have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

+1

Instagram: @mydream_watches

andrewjoo7 · 21 January 2019, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhawli

If you are tempted go for it. None of the watches you have can’t be obtained easily for reasonable prices.

ROO is a large watch and may want to consider versatility of owning only 1.

Personally I’m not a fan and would stick with the 2 you have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

do you mean none of the watches I have CAN be obtained easily for reasonable prices? lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by masterserg

44 full ceramic, 44 ceramic bezel or 42 ceramic bezel? 44 full ceramic likely yes. Other options, I would not.

def 44 full ceramic ; although I like the white dial ceramic bezel one which seems to be discontinued.

Quote:

Originally Posted by singe89

Are those your only two watches? Its a good combo of daily beater sub and nicer SS dressy sport watch.

However..the 44mm ROO Ce is an amazing watch!

It will wear much larger than either of your current watches. As long as it fits and it sings to you more than the other two I would 100% do it. The anthracite Ce is one of my all time favorite ROOs.

damn, im pretty much sold but having a hard time parting ways with the 15400

Quote:

Originally Posted by GB-man

Having owned all three. Yes absolutely.

sold lol

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ar_Mi

IMHO I think any collection that includes APs would be incomplete without some sort of RO model in it.

your right, the only thing that's stopping me is the 15400, I may have to just save up to buy an ROO which may take a long time

Quote:

Originally Posted by sokoloka

Absolutely would. Stopped wearing my other watches after I picked up my first 44 ROO, ended up with a second one within 30 days of buying the first and am now looking to pick up a third in the next few months.

Friggen LOVE the watch.

I think I would also, just having a hard time parting ways with the 15400

Quote:

Originally Posted by Helmi

+1

Instagram: @mydream_watches

lhawli · 21 January 2019, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewjoo7

do you mean none of the watches I have CAN be obtained easily for reasonable prices? lol

Nope I mean what I said. In other words your watches can easily be acquired if you get sellers remorse.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

andrewjoo7 · 21 January 2019, 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lhawli

Nope I mean what I said. In other words your watches can easily be acquired if you get sellers remorse.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

ok I was a bit confused cause you used 2 negatives lol

christopheran · 21 January 2019, 08:56 AM

I would keep the sub and RO and save up for the ROO

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

View Poll Results: Would you change 15400st silver+ rolex sub 116610ln for an ROO ceramic
Yes	29	35.37%
No	53	64.63%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

17 January 2019, 09:49 AM	#1
andrewjoo7 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2014 Location: Seoul Korea Posts: 149	Would you Hey guys i currently have a 15400st silver and a rolex sub 116610ln Ive been looking around and in love with the ROO ceramic. Would you change both for the ROO ceramic as an only watch? Im very tempted

17 January 2019, 09:53 AM	#2
lhawli "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Montreal, QC Posts: 1,256	Would you If you are tempted go for it. None of the watches you have can’t be obtained easily for reasonable prices. ROO is a large watch and may want to consider versatility of owning only 1. Personally I’m not a fan and would stick with the 2 you have. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]

17 January 2019, 10:00 AM	#3
masterserg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Serg Location: US of A Watch: AP Posts: 7,437	44 full ceramic, 44 ceramic bezel or 42 ceramic bezel? 44 full ceramic likely yes. Other options, I would not. __________________ How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????

17 January 2019, 10:58 AM	#5
GB-man 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA Watch: addiction issues Posts: 37,355	Having owned all three. Yes absolutely. __________________

17 January 2019, 10:34 AM	#4
singe89 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Jim Location: Orange County, CA Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek Posts: 3,747	Are those your only two watches? Its a good combo of daily beater sub and nicer SS dressy sport watch. However..the 44mm ROO Ce is an amazing watch! It will wear much larger than either of your current watches. As long as it fits and it sings to you more than the other two I would 100% do it. The anthracite Ce is one of my all time favorite ROOs.

17 January 2019, 12:25 PM	#6
Ar_Mi "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: Dubai/Los Angeles Watch: a few Posts: 595	IMHO I think any collection that includes APs would be incomplete without some sort of RO model in it.

17 January 2019, 03:35 PM	#7
sokoloka "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2017 Real Name: Eric Location: San Diego Watch: Audemars Piguet Posts: 1,547	Absolutely would. Stopped wearing my other watches after I picked up my first 44 ROO, ended up with a second one within 30 days of buying the first and am now looking to pick up a third in the next few months. Friggen LOVE the watch. __________________ Instagram: @rough.af

21 January 2019, 08:56 AM	#12
christopheran "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Real Name: Chris Location: Mullica Hill, NJ Watch: AP RO Diver Posts: 389	I would keep the sub and RO and save up for the ROO Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)