ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 February 2019, 02:58 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
|
Rolex 168000 Crystal
I have a 168000 with the cyclops on the date. I want to swap out the crystal for a non cyclops version. Which crystal would fit ? 14060 ?
Thanks for the help |
10 February 2019, 02:42 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
It is also possible to remove the cyclops if that is of any help to you.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
10 February 2019, 04:29 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Filipe
Location: Lisbon & Wadesdah
Watch: Never too many
Posts: 1,898
|
|
10 February 2019, 08:07 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
|
|
21 February 2019, 07:08 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London, UK
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
Here's what it would look like (pic lifted from another forum) |
|
21 February 2019, 08:30 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Remove the crystal from the watch. Heat the cyclops with a heat gun and it will break the glue loose and the crystal cyclops can then be removed.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
21 February 2019, 08:51 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 9
|
25-295 is the answer, same crystal as a 16520. Have plenty in stock if ya need one installed.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
21 February 2019, 05:51 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London, UK
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
|
|
23 February 2019, 12:06 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
|
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM. |
23 February 2019, 06:30 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
|
Thank you so much to all those that replied I'll be trying the remove the cyclop first and if content with the outcome it stays that way. Worst case i'll contact you about the mentioned crystal.
God the watch looks sooooo awesome without the cyclops over the date |
23 February 2019, 08:17 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
|
24 February 2019, 06:51 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London, UK
Posts: 76
|
I decided to just go for it with my 16800. Very pleased with how it turned out!
Next up is my 16750! |
24 February 2019, 07:22 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,398
|
Personally, I don’t get it. The cyclops is SO Rolex to me. It’s extremely functional too...but maybe your eyes a are younger than mine! If I didn’t want a cyclops, I’d just get a Sea Dweller. To each his own, of course. Just had to say it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
24 February 2019, 08:01 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: London, UK
Posts: 76
|
Quote:
I just found myself not wearing any of my watches with cyclops and reasoned that the cyclops was the issue. That said I'm hankering after a tritium 14060 as I don't own a no date sub! |
|
24 February 2019, 12:12 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.