Used Explorer 114270 vs New 214270 (2016)

[Rolex fan 61]

The 39mm Exp is ok for your wrist size.

[Mattewlaird]

tough one buddy

[Paul7]

Originally Posted by MagnumsGMTMaster

OP here.

Well, things moved a little faster than I was planning. But I'm happy with my choice. I got the 114270. It's the perfect size for my as-it-turns out just shy of 7 inch wrist. I could have sworn I had a bigger wrist. But anyway, thanks for all the input.

Btw, the 214270 is a great watch, I'm sure, with all the upgrades, etc. But the price differential was just too great, considering I would always be wanting the smaller 114270.

Photos that follow are with my previous daily wearer for the last 5 years for comparison. I wore that watch to death and it looks it. It's 38.5mm. But it sure looks huge next to the Explorer! Hopefully I'll be mindful to be more careful with the new one.

(Sorry for the poor photos and smudged timepieces.)

I would think the Rolex steel would be tougher.

[gordonite]

Originally Posted by Mick P

Chaps



The Explorer tends to be purchased by the more level headed owner who prize quality and simplicity above all else. They tend to keep the watch and then pass it on to their kids. This is why there are not that many for sale.



So if I was in the market for an Explorer, I would buy it new with my name on the paperwork and wear it until the day I drop.



Regards



Mick

agree on this one, albeit i did not buy my 114270 brand new, still consider it a heirloom that I can wear to its full potential.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk