ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

samson66 · 19 April 2019, 11:08 PM

40 looks much better

g00n · 19 April 2019, 11:41 PM

Thank you all for the honest opinions. Now I have to find a 116610LN =)

OpusXIII · 19 April 2019, 11:43 PM

Lose the sandals! Pick the Sub!

samson66 · 19 April 2019, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g00n

Thank you all for the honest opinions. Now I have to find a 116610LN =)

If you feel the Sub is pushing the limit size-wise on what your eyes are telling you, you can always go with a GMT which will wear a little smaller due to the thinner lugs, or go with a vintage Sub which will definitely wear smaller than a modern maxi-case Sub.

HK Islandboy · 20 April 2019, 12:01 AM

Sub looks great. Depends more on how tall/broad you are than wrist size alone. I too Alhambra a 7” wrist, but am a pretty big guy, so anything less than 40mm starts looking a bit like a toy on me

HogwldFLTR · 20 April 2019, 12:06 AM

I'm pretty certain the YM is 37mm not 36. I also see the 37mm looking better on your wrist. On the other hand the Sub is a more tradable watch and I'd believe easier to sell should the time come.

Skyrider01 · 20 April 2019, 12:34 AM

40mm looks better on you.
I too have 7" wrists, and I find 36mm looks too small on me.

BMWatch · 20 April 2019, 12:56 AM

Sub.

Dsl55 · 20 April 2019, 01:43 AM

YM looks tiny.

fixinbones · 20 April 2019, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Devildog

Have you tried the 40mm YM? Smaller case than the sub and better proportioned.

Ps. That YM in your pic is 37mm

Yeah the 40 yachmaster would look perfect

jb335 · 20 April 2019, 02:56 AM

I think the Sub looks way better on you. And I am not opposed to 36-39mm watches, but the Sub looks better.

ppalasthira · 20 April 2019, 03:00 AM

With 7 inch wrists, Sub for sure.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RHJ · 20 April 2019, 03:02 AM

YM, because it's more elegant... IMHO obviously

Oscarpapa · 20 April 2019, 03:09 AM

YM, both aesthetically and sizewise.

Caynuck · 20 April 2019, 03:11 AM

Forty

123Blueface · 20 April 2019, 03:52 AM

I have a 6.5” wrist and my smallest reference is 40mm.
To me, they look great. Don’t really care what others think.

poidog81 · 20 April 2019, 03:58 AM

Sub looks and fits much better, the YM looks too small on your wrist. FWIW, I have 6" wrists and were the 39mm Exp1. SubC no date is my next hunt. Did you try on the 40mm YM if you like that style better over the sub?

Albatross · 20 April 2019, 04:10 AM

I don't really consider a 7" wrist to be a "small" wrist. I think you can probably wear just about anything. Both pieces shown above look excellent on you. Maybe those huge Sea Dweller Deep Sea 43mm monsters might be a little overwhelming on your wrist, but my guess is that there are plenty of guys walking around with 7" wrists who are even wearing those.

R G · 20 April 2019, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TswaneNguni

Always 40mm

X2.

Standard men’s size.

shoresguy · 20 April 2019, 02:58 PM

The sub gets my vote .

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jonny deacon · 20 April 2019, 03:11 PM

Sub here sir, gl

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

19 April 2019, 11:43 PM	#33
OpusXIII "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Location: New Orleans Watch: Bluesy, Hulk, DJ Posts: 427	Lose the sandals! Pick the Sub! __________________ TT Submariner Bluesy, SS Submariner Hulk, TT DateJust 36mm w/ Super Jubilee bracelet.

20 April 2019, 12:06 AM	#36
HogwldFLTR 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Lee Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48 Watch: Too many to list! Posts: 33,693	I'm pretty certain the YM is 37mm not 36. I also see the 37mm looking better on your wrist. On the other hand the Sub is a more tradable watch and I'd believe easier to sell should the time come. __________________ Troglodyte in residence! https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599

20 April 2019, 03:11 AM	#45
Caynuck "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: Earth Posts: 435	Forty __________________ ♛126600 MK1 ♛116400GV ♛116710BLNR ♛116610LV ♛126711CHNR ♛326934 BLK ΩAqua Terra

20 April 2019, 03:52 AM	#46
123Blueface "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: USA Watch: All Posts: 5,316	I have a 6.5” wrist and my smallest reference is 40mm. To me, they look great. Don’t really care what others think. __________________ Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large

19 April 2019, 11:08 PM	#31
samson66 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Mike Location: Downy Ocean Hon Watch: my money leaving! Posts: 13,792	40 looks much better

19 April 2019, 11:41 PM	#32
g00n "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Austin Posts: 110	Thank you all for the honest opinions. Now I have to find a 116610LN =)

20 April 2019, 12:01 AM	#35
HK Islandboy "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2017 Location: Hong Kong Watch: AP Posts: 3,825	Sub looks great. Depends more on how tall/broad you are than wrist size alone. I too Alhambra a 7” wrist, but am a pretty big guy, so anything less than 40mm starts looking a bit like a toy on me

20 April 2019, 12:34 AM	#37
Skyrider01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Florida/Canada Posts: 1,312	40mm looks better on you. I too have 7" wrists, and I find 36mm looks too small on me.

20 April 2019, 12:56 AM	#38
BMWatch 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2019 Real Name: K Location: USA Watch: DSSD D Blue Posts: 408	Sub.

20 April 2019, 01:43 AM	#39
Dsl55 Banned Join Date: Sep 2018 Location: New York Posts: 20	YM looks tiny.

20 April 2019, 02:56 AM	#41
jb335 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: The States Watch: Cosmograph Daytona Posts: 7,464	I think the Sub looks way better on you. And I am not opposed to 36-39mm watches, but the Sub looks better.

20 April 2019, 03:00 AM	#42
ppalasthira Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: ASK Watch: SubC.5711.D500 Posts: 2,236	With 7 inch wrists, Sub for sure. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 April 2019, 03:02 AM	#43
RHJ 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: here Watch: 214270 Mk1 Posts: 924	YM, because it's more elegant... IMHO obviously

20 April 2019, 03:09 AM	#44
Oscarpapa "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Real Name: Noah Location: Ulster Posts: 391	YM, both aesthetically and sizewise.

20 April 2019, 03:58 AM	#47
poidog81 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: Ft Lauderdale Watch: EXP/SUB Posts: 150	Sub looks and fits much better, the YM looks too small on your wrist. FWIW, I have 6" wrists and were the 39mm Exp1. SubC no date is my next hunt. Did you try on the 40mm YM if you like that style better over the sub?

20 April 2019, 04:10 AM	#48
Albatross "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Michigan Posts: 182	I don't really consider a 7" wrist to be a "small" wrist. I think you can probably wear just about anything. Both pieces shown above look excellent on you. Maybe those huge Sea Dweller Deep Sea 43mm monsters might be a little overwhelming on your wrist, but my guess is that there are plenty of guys walking around with 7" wrists who are even wearing those.

20 April 2019, 02:58 PM	#50
shoresguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2016 Location: san diego Posts: 240	The sub gets my vote . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

20 April 2019, 03:11 PM	#51
jonny deacon "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: Lexington KY Posts: 595	Sub here sir, gl Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)