ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

heath.1967 · 29 April 2019, 10:34 PM

do you guys think i should pay 2000$ more for brand new Datejust41 Rhodium Diamond Dial ? i have another offer year 2013 Datejust II Rhodium Diamond in great condition for 2000$ less,thanks

teabags001 · 30 April 2019, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heath.1967

do you guys think i should pay 2000$ more for brand new Datejust41 Rhodium Diamond Dial ? i have another offer year 2013 Datejust II Rhodium Diamond in great condition for 2000$ less,thanks

This model DJll> DJ41 for bling. Thicker bigger and larger bezel. Good luck.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Devildog · 30 April 2019, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heath.1967

do you guys think i should pay 2000$ more for brand new Datejust41 Rhodium Diamond Dial ? i have another offer year 2013 Datejust II Rhodium Diamond in great condition for 2000$ less,thanks

Which one do you prefer on your wrist? That’s the watch you should buy.

Yes, one is less expensive but you’ll regret buying the wrong one if you let the cost be the deciding factor.

Rogoal · 3 May 2019, 02:46 AM

Dj41 my vote. Very comfy to wear too!

kirksingleton · 3 May 2019, 04:12 AM

not a fan of the dj2, stick with the 41!

oldblock · 4 May 2019, 10:45 AM

DJ 41mm for me because of the proportions - but remember to each and every one of the proportions are a subjective area - same for dial colours, date no date, etc etc
My preference is jubilee paired fluted and oyster paired smooth and love the Rhodium dial (also love the silver)

Jg422 · 4 May 2019, 11:35 AM

Had the DJ2 and let it go. It’s too bloated. I’d say DJ41

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jnkay · 4 May 2019, 11:24 PM

The size and proportions of the DJ II and 41 are so very different. As stated, the II is more substantial feeling and sporty looking on the wrist while the 41 is slighter and dressier but by no means small as it has a bigger dial than than the 40mm sport models and same overall size.

I like the DJ II as a casual weekend watch but it wears large and the proportions are too sporty to work as a dress watch for me, but the 41 works perfectly as a dress watch IMHO. Yes, the DJ II has a larger bezel but my 41 sparkles just as much. I love my DJ II but if I had to choose only one, I’d have to go with the 41 because of its versatility and proportions, esp. given my average wrist size.

I had the DJ II Wimbledon dial. I’ll take the Wimbledon romans every day over the diamonds because the only diamonds I like are baguette cuts as used on the DD 40. Romans just exude class!

All of this is personal preference. You have to try them on and decide for yourself.

3 May 2019, 02:46 AM	#4
Rogoal "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: USA Posts: 54	Dj41 my vote. Very comfy to wear too! Attached Images

29 April 2019, 10:34 PM	#1
heath.1967 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: Canada Posts: 224	do you guys think i should pay 2000$ more for brand new Datejust41 Rhodium Diamond Dial ? i have another offer year 2013 Datejust II Rhodium Diamond in great condition for 2000$ less,thanks

3 May 2019, 04:12 AM	#5
kirksingleton "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 1,759	not a fan of the dj2, stick with the 41!

4 May 2019, 10:45 AM	#6
oldblock "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2013 Real Name: Colin Location: New Zealand Watch: DJ41 Posts: 213	DJ 41mm for me because of the proportions - but remember to each and every one of the proportions are a subjective area - same for dial colours, date no date, etc etc My preference is jubilee paired fluted and oyster paired smooth and love the Rhodium dial (also love the silver)

4 May 2019, 11:35 AM	#7
Jg422 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: NYC Posts: 296	Had the DJ2 and let it go. It’s too bloated. I’d say DJ41 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

4 May 2019, 11:24 PM	#8
jnkay "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: South Florida, US Watch: du jour Posts: 1,815	The size and proportions of the DJ II and 41 are so very different. As stated, the II is more substantial feeling and sporty looking on the wrist while the 41 is slighter and dressier but by no means small as it has a bigger dial than than the 40mm sport models and same overall size. I like the DJ II as a casual weekend watch but it wears large and the proportions are too sporty to work as a dress watch for me, but the 41 works perfectly as a dress watch IMHO. Yes, the DJ II has a larger bezel but my 41 sparkles just as much. I love my DJ II but if I had to choose only one, I’d have to go with the 41 because of its versatility and proportions, esp. given my average wrist size. I had the DJ II Wimbledon dial. I’ll take the Wimbledon romans every day over the diamonds because the only diamonds I like are baguette cuts as used on the DD 40. Romans just exude class! All of this is personal preference. You have to try them on and decide for yourself.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)