The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 25 June 2019, 01:47 AM   #1
Moggo
"TRF" Member
 
Moggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Watch: 16610, SD4K, Exp 1
Posts: 1,098
The Seamaster master co-axial without the helium escape valve looks lovely (not entirely sure of the model)

But not sure I could spend nearly £5K on it, seems a bit strong as it will lose money quickly I would guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 02:02 AM   #2
Justingtr
"TRF" Member
 
Justingtr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Laredo
Posts: 191
The bracelet on the Seamaster is horrible. To me it looks like a bad attempt at a jubilee

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Justingtr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 03:59 AM   #3
thewheel82
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 104
Neither watch is necessarily better. You could make an easier argument that the Omega SMP is the better watch from a technical perspective, as others have already described. I own the new SMP and Rolex Explorer. I chose the SMP over the Sub, but still love the Sub.

Market demand and styling are personal preferences. So many fanboys on here say watch ABC is "better" than watch XYZ simply because they like it better but provide zero factual statements as to why. It can be quite comical but is also tiresome due to lack of objective reasoning.
thewheel82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 04:03 AM   #4
007timer
"TRF" Member
 
007timer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,383
I have both. I love both. Omega keeps better time than Rolex, but not by much. They are equally good but Rolex holds better value.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
007timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 05:03 AM   #5
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
I do not own the SM (rather the original 42mm PO); however, looking at build, technology, value and bulletproof-ness, I can safely say that the SM is a notch ahead of the Sub. Styling, status, history and recognition is a whole other game and that's where the Sub gets the upper hand.

Having said that, I cannot seem to get over the bracelet style and the fact it does not tapper as well as the skeleton hands of the SM - they are just ugly! And why change the He crown to look like a Reeses cup!!!
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 05:07 AM   #6
forcinitijp
2024 Pledge Member
 
forcinitijp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Juan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 14060M/214270
Posts: 284
Submariner vs Seamaster

It gives me a lot of laughter as they try to defend the SUB, even knowing that they are so scamming with the price ...

supposedly with a watch from another league as many say ... they seem many defenses for what they argue

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
«Watches? In those of the ancient world, when they were sunny, there was a phrase inscribed: Omnia vulnerant, ultima necat all the hours hurt, the last kills. That certainty is, ultimately, the secret mechanism that moves the hands of the clock.
forcinitijp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:22 AM   #7
Krash
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Krash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 8,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by forcinitijp View Post
It gives me a lot of laughter as they try to defend the SUB, even knowing that they are so scamming with the price ...

supposedly with a watch from another league as many say ... they seem many defenses for what they argue

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I’m a big fan of the Seamaster. I might get one, but honestly, in real life, there is no comparison. On the internet and on YouTube videos, they might look like equals, but not in real life. The Sub is in a different league.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Krash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 05:21 AM   #8
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
At least it's not just people who bought the one steel Rolex who are tearing into Omega and we're all enthusiasts who've owned several of each.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 06:00 AM   #9
drtii
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Dan
Location: West Coast
Watch: 216570 | 126660
Posts: 582
There are Omega's that I like, such as the Speedmaster Professional, but the Seamaster IMO is one of the ugliest watches I've ever seen. I just can't get over how ridiculous it looks. From the bezel to the dial. It's just...not right.

That's not a knock on the brand. I would most definitely wear Omega, I simply can't even look at the Seamaster without thinking it looks hokey. The black model is a bit more understated and I can start see why people would buy one, then you see the blue and it's like holy...no. just no.
drtii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 06:24 AM   #10
seabreeze60
"TRF" Member
 
seabreeze60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: Tudor, Carl F. Buc
Posts: 1,580
While you are on the subject, what is your opinion of this version of the Seamaster Aqua Terra?

Name:  IMG_2168.jpg
Views: 240
Size:  88.9 KB
seabreeze60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:14 AM   #11
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze60 View Post
While you are on the subject, what is your opinion of this version of the Seamaster Aqua Terra?
Reminds me of something like a gold plated Casio. What kind of sea master has a leather strap and gold case anyway?
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:25 AM   #12
seabreeze60
"TRF" Member
 
seabreeze60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: Tudor, Carl F. Buc
Posts: 1,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
Reminds me of something like a gold plated Casio. What kind of sea master has a leather strap and gold case anyway?


Thanks! This thread is saving me lots of money.
seabreeze60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 09:32 AM   #13
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by seabreeze60 View Post
Thanks! This thread is saving me lots of money.
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:05 AM   #14
forcinitijp
2024 Pledge Member
 
forcinitijp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Juan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 14060M/214270
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
I understand that people who are only from one brand, or who cost them a lot to buy one of their products, feel like their guardians and defenders, instead of the people for whom Rolex is just one more brand in the market appreciates several brands of wristwatches and how I find them all attractive, from a Japanese watch like the Grand Seiko to one of the brands of the Holy Trinity, finding and appreciating the work of each watchmaker even more than one home with as much history as Omega is.
forcinitijp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 11:54 AM   #15
forcinitijp
2024 Pledge Member
 
forcinitijp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Juan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 14060M/214270
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
Reminds me of something like a gold plated Casio. What kind of sea master has a leather strap and gold case anyway?
https://www.patek.com/en/collection/nautilus/5726A-001

https://www.patek.com/en/collection/nautilus/5712R-001

Patek thinks differently than you think ...
forcinitijp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 June 2019, 10:20 AM   #16
seabreeze60
"TRF" Member
 
seabreeze60's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: Tudor, Carl F. Buc
Posts: 1,580
The problem is with forums and other brands is that there is little participation. Rolex fans are by far the most passionate.
seabreeze60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 02:57 AM   #17
jezza17
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: DRSD
Posts: 511
Both rolex and omega are built to outlast us so get whatever sings to you.
jezza17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 03:27 AM   #18
Mike 75
"TRF" Member
 
Mike 75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: South Central
Watch: PO 2200.50
Posts: 37
PO>Sub>SMP, IMO.
However, a SD beats all three.
Mike 75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 03:57 AM   #19
forcinitijp
2024 Pledge Member
 
forcinitijp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Juan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 14060M/214270
Posts: 284


Tool watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
«Watches? In those of the ancient world, when they were sunny, there was a phrase inscribed: Omnia vulnerant, ultima necat all the hours hurt, the last kills. That certainty is, ultimately, the secret mechanism that moves the hands of the clock.
forcinitijp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 05:20 AM   #20
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by forcinitijp View Post


Tool watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


That’s one way of putting it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 05:41 AM   #21
Moggo
"TRF" Member
 
Moggo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wales
Watch: 16610, SD4K, Exp 1
Posts: 1,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by forcinitijp View Post


Tool watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


He’s not that bad!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Moggo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 05:53 AM   #22
oldman2005
"TRF" Member
 
oldman2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by forcinitijp View Post


Tool watch!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He could have worn a Submariner but he's still on the waiting list. War will wait for no one!

It's good to see Omega is giving Rolex a tough fight in the SS diver market, but how can Rolex win if it doesn't show up and basically is giving tittle away to Omega.
oldman2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:06 AM   #23
007timer
"TRF" Member
 
007timer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldman2005 View Post
He could have worn a Submariner but he's still on the waiting list. War will wait for no one!

It's good to see Omega is giving Rolex a tough fight in the SS diver market, but how can Rolex win if it doesn't show up and basically is giving tittle away to Omega.


Rolex is not giving up. It’s revenue is sky high. It’s a strategy to maintain the level of production and sell more of the less popular models like two tone watches and even precious metal watches at a rate never seen before.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
007timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:18 AM   #24
greengold
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: uk
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldman2005 View Post
He could have worn a Submariner but he's still on the waiting list. War will wait for no one!

It's good to see Omega is giving Rolex a tough fight in the SS diver market, but how can Rolex win if it doesn't show up and basically is giving tittle away to Omega.
Actually his SMP was a gift from his mother Diana Princess Of Wales hence it has great sentimental value to him. Interesting she chose it over the Submariner..
greengold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:30 AM   #25
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengold View Post
Actually his SMP was a gift from his mother Diana Princess Of Wales hence it has great sentimental value to him. Interesting she chose it over the Submariner..
She probably wasn't a watch person.
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:33 AM   #26
filsgreen
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: Phil
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
She probably wasn't a watch person.
Why?
filsgreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:38 AM   #27
forcinitijp
2024 Pledge Member
 
forcinitijp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Juan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 14060M/214270
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
She probably wasn't a watch person.


The Royal Navy use Seamaster in blue ...

The SUB in gold diamond, now, is used by Ronaldo... out of the soccer field...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
«Watches? In those of the ancient world, when they were sunny, there was a phrase inscribed: Omnia vulnerant, ultima necat all the hours hurt, the last kills. That certainty is, ultimately, the secret mechanism that moves the hands of the clock.
forcinitijp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 June 2019, 10:58 AM   #28
Justinmg
"TRF" Member
 
Justinmg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
She probably wasn't a watch person.
I think the opposite, most Rolex owners buy for brand Recognition.
__________________
////////////////////////////////
Member of The Nylon Nation

Does it do anything? It tells the time.
Justinmg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 August 2019, 05:50 AM   #29
AJMarcus
"TRF" Member
 
AJMarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: AJ
Location: USA
Watch: Swiss
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seibei View Post
She probably wasn't a watch person.
Back in the day Omega sold them in mall department stores in the US next to Tags. They were a step up from a fashion watch with all the hype from brosnan at the time. The quartz Seamaster was a big seller for omega at that time. Seriously....
AJMarcus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 June 2019, 06:33 AM   #30
Onequik135i
"TRF" Member
 
Onequik135i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by greengold View Post
Actually his SMP was a gift from his mother Diana Princess Of Wales hence it has great sentimental value to him. Interesting she chose it over the Submariner..
Wow, I can see why he would wear it quite frequently then. I have always admired the 2531.80 and sold mine, but this thread is now making me regret selling it otherwise. I’m not too fond of the newer Ceramic ones.
__________________
16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170
Onequik135i is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.