|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
13 August 2019, 07:11 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CA/CO
Watch: Sub
Posts: 161
|
16610 or 16610T?
Does anyone have a preference to the 16610 or 16610T? I am doing some research and it seems like the deciding factor is wether you want to keep the original bracelet on the watch or switch out for an AM one.
Curious to hear the opinions of other members. |
|
|
|
13 August 2019, 07:16 AM
|
#2 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
Some folks like the old-style look of through holes, some don't.
I don't find any advantage with bracelet changes, it's just the use of a different tool, nothing more. 
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
|
|
|
13 August 2019, 08:02 AM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 August 2019, 11:26 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: CA/CO
Watch: Sub
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
I prefer no holes, it just looks cleaner to me. How about you? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
