The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 August 2019, 12:24 PM   #1
vesnyder
"TRF" Member
 
vesnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Vance
Location: North Coast
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,572
Submariner 16610 vs 116610

Looking at getting the Submariner. Considering the older 16610 vs the 116610. Like the shape of the case and lugs better on the 16610, but like the bezel and clasp better on the 116610. The price difference is negligible and with the improved clasp and bezel, I am thinking the newer Submariner, but what do you think?
vesnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:28 PM   #2
Htab
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Dad
Location: USA
Watch: To many
Posts: 1,389
Newer definitely.
Htab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:29 PM   #3
Marcjvr
"TRF" Member
 
Marcjvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southeast
Watch: 214270
Posts: 2,749
If you have a smaller wrist I would consider the 5 digit ref.
Marcjvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:42 PM   #4
Wrist King
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: 16610 Sub, 16710 P
Posts: 333
I had a similar question and went 16610. It's the best watch in the world, will always be a classic, has dexy lines, and whilst it may appear that the clasp is flimsy it's as strong and light as a space shuttle and better built. No rolex collection is complete without the James Bond of Subs. Suggest looking for a 200-2006 model.

Sent from my SM-G9730 using Tapatalk
Wrist King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 12:45 PM   #5
billfredericks
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
billfredericks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: George
Location: Massachusetts
Watch: Milgauss
Posts: 685
Both great. But that glidelock can’t be beat.
billfredericks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 01:15 PM   #6
ForSure5120
"TRF" Member
 
ForSure5120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by billfredericks View Post
Both great. But that glidelock can’t be beat.


This.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ForSure5120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 01:16 PM   #7
iheartrolexx
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: 215
Posts: 470
the 6 digit
iheartrolexx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 01:31 PM   #8
indywatchguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 47
I got your six!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
indywatchguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 01:42 PM   #9
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
You take more chances moving into the secondary market, if you are a neophyte. Of course, "buying" the seller first will diminish the risks.

Beyond that, you can't go wrong with either choice.

I'd suggest trying on both pieces first, though.

My 14060M:

__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 02:20 PM   #10
Crazy Lugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
Definitely try both on before committing to purchase. They're actually complementary, in a way. Two quite different pieces, IMHO.
Crazy Lugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 02:28 PM   #11
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
New.From AD.
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 02:32 PM   #12
shaunylw
"TRF" Member
 
shaunylw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,660
5 digit is more comfortable for me. 6 digit bracelet is unbeatable. I enjoy the 5 digit bracelet but it’s a night and day difference.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shaunylw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 03:13 PM   #13
DamageInc.77
"TRF" Member
 
DamageInc.77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
Get the old one, it looks better.
__________________
Don't drink out of ornamental ponds in Tiergarten. You will get sick.
DamageInc.77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 05:33 PM   #14
JP.
"TRF" Member
 
JP.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
My friend JBH wrote the best article ever of this topic.

16610 vs 116610
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog
JP. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 05:48 PM   #15
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
I have the old and the new Submariners.

For me they both have their positives and negatives.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 06:57 PM   #16
JP.
"TRF" Member
 
JP.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,914
Personally I think the 5-digit Sub is probably the coolest watch ever made (with the exception of the 5513 maybe).

For me the older one is like a beautiful, slim mistress with a LOT of "history". In comparison the new one is like a fat, good and sensible wife who cooks good food. Seriously, the new one is much better watch but it's not even funny how much better the old one looks.

__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog
JP. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 06:59 PM   #17
radicalchic
"TRF" Member
 
radicalchic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 31
116610

Another level of quality.
radicalchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 07:01 PM   #18
Jamie1111
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Both are great, but I definitely prefer 116610


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Jamie1111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 07:28 PM   #19
abozz
"TRF" Member
 
abozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: In my home.
Watch: 116660, 126600
Posts: 2,905
116610 for me, glidelock is very veryyyy important to me.


Enviado desde mi SM-G975F mediante Tapatalk
abozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 August 2019, 07:52 PM   #20
zuber
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: UK
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 97
I prefer the old one, 16610.
zuber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 12:22 AM   #21
javier
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Argentina
Posts: 804
16610
javier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 12:28 AM   #22
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
When it comes to a decision like this you really need to try both on. You can't go wrong and it mostly just comes down to personal preference.

If you need glidelock then that will settle it right there.
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 12:56 AM   #23
ian.thomas
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ian.thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,365
I purchased a 5 digit D-series in 2005 that I love and think it's the perfect watch. But if I were shopping today, I would probably go with a 6 digit. The price of the 5s have come up so much that making the leap to 6 is not much more and then you have the 'current' version with the nicer bracelet/clasp.
__________________

You're asking me how a watch works. For now, let’s just keep an eye on the time.
ian.thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:01 AM   #24
scurfa
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sunderland
Posts: 1,320
I had both and the new one wears far better, the older date looks a bit small now, I think if you go vintage it’s a no date and new its a date, just my opinion
__________________
Instagram @scurfawatches
scurfa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:01 AM   #25
coaxial
"TRF" Member
 
coaxial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Naples, FL
Watch: 5513, 116610LN
Posts: 304
No shortage of either on the used/grey market. If you like the modern feel of the newer models I would not hesitate on purchasing one. Imo, 5 digits are great as well; Try both on at a Used/Grey dealer. That is the best way to decide.
__________________
Watches: Rolex: 116610LN; 5513; 18238; 214270; 16613| JLC: 3161.
coaxial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:05 AM   #26
vesnyder
"TRF" Member
 
vesnyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Vance
Location: North Coast
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
I had both and the new one wears far better, the older date looks a bit small now, I think if you go vintage it’s a no date and new its a date, just my opinion
I like that recommendation!
vesnyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:10 AM   #27
pepsiretail
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,052
The LV is my favourite for the bezel but also the maxi hands and markers which give it a fuller look





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pepsiretail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:35 AM   #28
ltmgeller
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ltmgeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,591
If you can, try them both on. They are both great watches. Pick the one that feels right for you.
__________________
Oh, look at the time...
Official Member: 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas International GTG 2019
ltmgeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 01:58 AM   #29
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
OP - I’ve been in your shoes before when trying to decide between the 5-digit and 6-digit Submariner Date. I originally did not like the 6-digit, from pictures thought the lugs were too wide and it was “too blingy”. My 5-digit Submariner Date had lug holes and the slimmer profile and was my daily.

I ultimately converted to the 6-digit and have zero regrets. It does not wear as “wide” as it shows in pictures and it feels like it’s worth every penny that it costs, and then some.

So, I would choose the 116610 over the 16610, but you gotta go with what “sings” to you most.
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2019, 02:44 AM   #30
Jster
2024 Pledge Member
 
Jster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
I agree with what JP says above. The 6 digit is the better watch but the 5 digit is the better looking watch.
Jster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.