The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 June 2019, 05:16 AM   #31
JorgeCCW
"TRF" Member
 
JorgeCCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,707
if i have the choice to choose plexiglass or Saphire at same price I ll go Plexi. If i can save $100 or more by going Saphire I'll go sapphire
__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Nothing happens until something moves "
Albert Einstein
JorgeCCW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 06:50 AM   #32
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Out of interest, why are so many people adamant that 372 is wrong to have a sapphire crystal, when another Paneristi favourite - PAM 127 - has it?
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 10:03 AM   #33
Dan2010
"TRF" Member
 
Dan2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinkholeninja View Post
Out of interest, why are so many people adamant that 372 is wrong to have a sapphire crystal, when another Paneristi favourite - PAM 127 - has it?
You are trying to use logic. Nothing is logical about collecting luxury watches.
Dan2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 01:05 PM   #34
erik asher
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinkholeninja View Post
Out of interest, why are so many people adamant that 372 is wrong to have a sapphire crystal, when another Paneristi favourite - PAM 127 - has it?
You are comparing apples and oranges in the Panerai world...the sapphire in a 127 is a domed sapphire that starts out flat at the bezel and curves to a dome...the sapphire on a 372 is raised off the bezel and has a comleltelyndoffeeent look and feel...

IMHO, the two best crystals are domed sapphire and raised plexi...raised sapphire doesn’t do it for me
erik asher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 04:12 PM   #35
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by erik asher View Post
You are comparing apples and oranges in the Panerai world...the sapphire in a 127 is a domed sapphire that starts out flat at the bezel and curves to a dome...the sapphire on a 372 is raised off the bezel and has a comleltelyndoffeeent look and feel...

IMHO, the two best crystals are domed sapphire and raised plexi...raised sapphire doesn’t do it for me
Ok, but it's still crystal. One of the main arguments for plexi on 372 is that it makes the watch more historically correct and yet I couldn't find a single comment of that nature on 127.
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2019, 04:14 PM   #36
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan2010 View Post
You are trying to use logic. Nothing is logical about collecting luxury watches.
You might be onto something my friend
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 01:42 AM   #37
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
Nothing wrong with the sapphire crystal. The plexi just feels more vintage which is the principle design cue of the 372. Then again, it has a sapphire caseback...
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 03:12 AM   #38
fullcourt
"TRF" Member
 
fullcourt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: dp
Location: chicago, usa
Watch: panerai
Posts: 2,369
Quote:
Originally Posted by sinkholeninja View Post
Out of interest, why are so many people adamant that 372 is wrong to have a sapphire crystal, when another Paneristi favourite - PAM 127 - has it?
totally different watches at different times....

the 372 with the plexi is just 'right' imho, but as i always say, buy what you like and wear what you want.
__________________
dp
just living the dream
chicago, usa

chgo_risti on IG
fullcourt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 04:52 AM   #39
yran
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Usa
Posts: 61
I like the sapphire, I have always wanted one. I would certainly go with the sapphire.
yran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 04:58 AM   #40
synequano
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 413
Name:  IMG_7496.JPG
Views: 127
Size:  254.2 KB

I like the domed sapphire as they’re more durable (and I’m clumsy)
synequano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 August 2019, 07:18 AM   #41
sinkholeninja
"TRF" Member
 
sinkholeninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Zeus
Location: London
Watch: Ocean 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by synequano View Post
Attachment 1065369

I like the domed sapphire as they’re more durable (and I’m clumsy)
Wow, that thing is DOMED! Looks amazing
__________________
Lange (ref. Saxonia Thin RG); Vacheron C. (ref. 3110v); Ressence (ref. Type 8); Rolex Explorer (ref. 124270); Rolex Sub (ref. 126610LV); Porsche Design IWC (ref. Ocean 2000); Seiko (ref. SLA039)
sinkholeninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.