ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 March 2016, 01:08 PM | #391 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
|
30 March 2016, 01:27 PM | #392 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
Go ahead, write whatever you want RR, you couldn't leave this as a discussion about opinions, I won't be responding. Frankly, you're not worth wasting my time. |
|
30 March 2016, 01:27 PM | #393 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Quote:
|
|
30 March 2016, 01:29 PM | #394 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Dam it Abdullah! I can't argue with anything you say tonight! Once again, you are probably right. IF, it didn't exist before company X made it, I sure hope it gets blocked, or fixed or whatever before any malicious acts are a result of it. We can all only pray for peace.
|
30 March 2016, 01:31 PM | #395 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
|
|
30 March 2016, 01:37 PM | #396 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
|
|
30 March 2016, 01:40 PM | #397 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Ok, despite the fact of me being disappointed I can't get in to an argument with you tonight, that post made me laugh out loud! Nice one.
|
30 March 2016, 01:56 PM | #398 | |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Quote:
Lets keep things in perspective. |
|
30 March 2016, 01:58 PM | #399 | |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Quote:
So again, I stand by my statement. Thank God you aren't in charge of our civil liberties or rights to privacy. You already posted that Apple should just give them what they wanted without due process OR the FBI providing any evidence of an eminent threat coming from information on that phone. But yea, thanks for the service |
|
30 March 2016, 06:32 PM | #400 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
I am insulted by this statement sir, but I won't harbor any anger. The only emotion I feel towards you is pity... Oops! But I do owe you an apology Mr. RR. I said I would not respond to anymore of your attacks. I am sincerely sorry, I promise this is my last. |
|
30 March 2016, 06:52 PM | #401 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
Dignity and respect is the order of the day. Agree to disagree and move on. |
|
30 March 2016, 06:56 PM | #402 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
|
Quote:
Darn it! Can't you say something I don't agree with!!!! I was SO looking forward to getting in to an argument with you tonight! You ruined my evening.. Say something about me being ugly. Well, never mind, couldn't argue that either. |
|
30 March 2016, 07:26 PM | #403 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
wow, apple comes out the BIG LOSER here.
not only did they impede the investigation, but their equipment isn't that secure, anyway, and, thanks to this drama, everyone knows it. apple should have just cooperated, trumpeted itself as working with the government to track down terrorists, and no one would have blinked an eye.... |
30 March 2016, 07:50 PM | #404 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Real Name: Will R.
Location: Germany
Watch: Neighborhood
Posts: 91
|
I honestly think this was a win for both sides of the argument.
On one hand, the FBI were not able to force a company into doing something that they were morally opposed to (whether you agree with the moral compass in this particular circumstance is, in my opinion, irrelevant). The FBI then pursued alternative methods with someone WILLING to perform these tasks. The information will be obtained and hopefully is used to save countless lives. But the tasks were completed in a capitalistic manner- if one person won't do it, then just ask another one. A manner which provides choices and options. Anyway, just my 2 cents. |
30 March 2016, 07:51 PM | #405 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
Quote:
They didn't impede an investigation (which is a crime BTW), they stood fast to the law when the FBI was trying to create a new de facto law (bypassing congress). How do I know? No one at Apple was arrested or subpoenaed. If they impeded a murder investigation with national security implications there would have been harsh action. This was all quite genteel. The FBI didn't have a slam dunk chance of winning this in court and ran for the hills at the first opportunity. The ACLU was chasing it, which should put the issue in some context. The new precedent will be resistance from the tech companies until the courts define the envelope. It's not over, just delayed until the next case arises. |
|
30 March 2016, 08:29 PM | #406 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.