ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
28 November 2009, 09:10 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
|
i have both and both are super.
i wear the pam more. cant go wrong with either one in your collection. |
28 November 2009, 09:58 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Pep
Location: Miami
Watch: GMTIIc, Pam320
Posts: 2,773
|
have the rolex but my pam is the 244
__________________
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." -Benjamin Franklin Prick #8 |
28 November 2009, 02:54 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: matt
Location: Denver
Posts: 608
|
Love both brands, but neither of those models do it for me.
__________________
Current Collection Rolex SS Daytona WD IWC Big Pilot PAM Black Seal 183 Omega SS Triple Date TW Steel CEO |
29 November 2009, 12:47 AM | #4 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
|
88 for me also...
__________________
|
30 November 2009, 11:20 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: columbus, oh
Watch: PAM 321
Posts: 76
|
like em both... oh wait... I have both!
|
30 November 2009, 11:31 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Justin
Location: NY, USA
Watch: yo self!
Posts: 2,686
|
IMO the GMT is a nicer watch, but you don't see the Panerai's everywhere. IF you want to be different and still have a great piece, get the Pam.
|
30 November 2009, 01:12 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: TEXAS
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 222
|
gmt
|
30 November 2009, 01:56 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 578
|
Just based on looks that's a tough one for me, but I would go with the GMT-IIc. As for the watch as a whole, I would say the GMT-IIc is a clear winner. If the 88 were replaced with a 320 however, that might be a completely different story.
__________________
__________________________________________ "I'm a man of simple tastes, easily satisfied with the best." |
1 December 2009, 05:17 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 194
|
I only have one watch, a PAM, so naturally am a PAM fan BUT in this case, the GMT-IIc definitely is the better looking watch
PAM is too busy, as someone mentioned before, PAMs are great when simple, not so much a fan of their busy watches |
2 December 2009, 02:29 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
GMT II-c for me.
|
6 December 2009, 04:13 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Rey
Location: Philippines
Watch: GMTIIC
Posts: 47
|
GMT IIC for me.
|
7 December 2009, 12:33 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
|
GMTC for me not a fan of the pam 88.....
Maybe a different pam will do it for me..... |
7 December 2009, 12:36 AM | #13 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Carlo
Location: Philippines
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 444
|
Go for PAM 320 :)
|
7 December 2009, 12:34 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
Like both of them but sold my GMTIIc to fund something else. I will have another some day.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
7 December 2009, 06:39 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Perry
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 84
|
For me, it's got to be the GMT C
|
7 December 2009, 08:08 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
agree 100%
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
8 December 2009, 06:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Posts: 1,305
|
I agree with the above comment too.
|
8 December 2009, 07:20 AM | #18 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
Between those two, I'd go with the Rolex
|
8 December 2009, 01:42 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Monica
Posts: 4
|
If you don't already have a sport rolex, go with the GMT II. If you do take the PAM because all sport rolexes look the same :)
|
8 December 2009, 02:44 PM | #20 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
|
Both are beauties, like asking which one of my kids I think is cuter, I won't ever answer.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
8 December 2009, 02:47 PM | #21 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
Nice to have you back and posting.......give those cute kids of yours a big hug and a kiss from their bald Uncle JJ!! Trust all is well with you, my friend. Keep well - JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
8 December 2009, 02:52 PM | #22 |
Lifetime TRF Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
|
Nice to be back JJ. All is going bro, just trying to keep smiling brutha.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!! I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo. |
8 December 2009, 03:08 PM | #23 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,120
|
Sure the Rolly, and I stand by it.
|
22 December 2009, 10:42 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: MICHAEL
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 549
|
Two different style watches, but I would say PAM 88 is a better looking watch.
Mike |
23 December 2009, 06:27 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scandinavia
Watch: ♛
Posts: 1,330
|
Both nice watches ,.. but I can't stand common popular watches watches like the gmt iic so I'd go for the Panerai here
|
23 December 2009, 06:58 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
The GMT IIC is just so stunning that there's no comparison IMO. As others have commented, I like my Panerai to have more simple dials.
|
23 December 2009, 07:28 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
|
GMT2C all the way~
|
23 December 2009, 01:16 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 12
|
|
1 January 2010, 04:45 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Boyet
Location: Philippines
Watch: Sub ND
Posts: 268
|
definitely IIc, and a PAM later.
|
1 January 2010, 11:52 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
GMTIIc for me (as I've just bought one)
However I choose the 233 as my PAM GMT choice, and despite thoroughly enjoying my new Rolex, it is still my favorite choice. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.