ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JJ Irani · 1 December 2009, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horlogerie

err..what's a lume shot? sorry but newbie here

A shot that makes the Luminova on the watch hands and markers glow in the dark.

JJ

NYC6 · 1 December 2009, 11:20 AM

illumination. Dark shot showing glowing bits.

horlogerie · 1 December 2009, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

A shot that makes the Luminova on the watch hands and markers glow in the dark.

JJ

Ah ok, thanks JJ, will try posting it soon along with close-up shot of the Romans

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC6

illumination. Dark shot showing glowing bits.

Ok, thanks!!!

TheRolex88 · 1 December 2009, 10:09 PM

Looks Great...now I want one!

esm · 1 December 2009, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horlogerie

Ah ok, thanks JJ, will try posting it soon along with close-up shot of the Romans

dont want to getyour hopes up... there will be no lume on the roman numerals.... only the hour, seconds and the baton at 9 oclock will lume up in dark.

another reason why there is a baton at 9oclock......

Viral · 2 December 2009, 05:55 AM

nice watch.........they need to hurry up and release that bad boy with a jubilee bracelet!!

anipit · 2 December 2009, 06:05 AM

congratulations, it is really big, compared to the subdate.
I don't like too much roman numbers on Rolex because of the IIII instead of IV, i can't accept they change it to fit better on dial, without respecting ancient romans who invented that kind of numbers.

esm · 2 December 2009, 06:18 AM

the 41mm DJII is not bigger than a 40mm Sub Date and from memory most of rolex roman dials has IIII instead of IV even on the smaller 36mm DJs

JJ Irani · 2 December 2009, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

the 41mm DJII is not bigger than a 40mm Sub Date and from memory most of rolex roman dials has IIII instead of IV even on the smaller 36mm DJs

Quite right!!

The larger rotating bezel of the Sub compensates for the 1 mm difference.

If you place them side-by-side, they will appear to be the same size.

JJ

esm · 2 December 2009, 06:29 AM

I'd link a pic of my Sub and DJII for comparison if I was on the laptop....

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheRolex88

Looks Great...now I want one!

Go for it! You won't regret it

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viral

nice watch.........they need to hurry up and release that bad boy with a jubilee bracelet!!

Not really a fan of jubilee bracelet but would love to see it

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anipit

congratulations, it is really big, compared to the subdate.
I don't like too much roman numbers on Rolex because of the IIII instead of IV, i can't accept they change it to fit better on dial, without respecting ancient romans who invented that kind of numbers.

Wow I didn't realize that at all... learned something new

esm · 3 December 2009, 08:52 AM

rolex has always used IIII instead of IV for their watches, so I guess you will have accept this non-change issue on the DJII.......

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valentine

considering the same dial option! can you show us a lume shot??? i am interested to see how it is....

Here you go...

s3lasinc · 3 December 2009, 09:11 AM

that's a good looking watch! congrats!

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

the DJII doesnt look bigger than the Sub does it..?

Took them side-by-side....

cobblecanyon · 3 December 2009, 10:19 AM

Very nice DJ II...enjoy!

Deyn Man · 3 December 2009, 11:14 AM

sweet!!!

if i were to get a DJII, i would definitely want that dial! would have wanted the 9 to be in roman nuemerals too instead of the "dash" but that's just me...

great acquisition man!

mdtddd2007 · 3 December 2009, 12:06 PM

beautiful...congrats....

1000ftSub · 3 December 2009, 12:07 PM

AH, very classy looking enjoy

SayangM · 3 December 2009, 01:02 PM

Sales guy in Cancun put it around my wrist, since then I cannot get it out of my mind.
Wear it in good health!

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by s3lasinc

that's a good looking watch! congrats!

Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by cobblecanyon

Very nice DJ II...enjoy!

Thank-you

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deyn Man

sweet!!!

if i were to get a DJII, i would definitely want that dial! would have wanted the 9 to be in roman nuemerals too instead of the "dash" but that's just me...

great acquisition man!

True, also nice if the Romans were lumes

horlogerie · 3 December 2009, 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mdtddd2007

beautiful...congrats....

Thanks

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1000ftSub

AH, very classy looking enjoy

Thanks and back at 'ya

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayangM

Sales guy in Cancun put it around my wrist, since then I cannot get it out of my mind.
Wear it in good health!

Thanks and go for it!!!

zak98 · 3 December 2009, 11:12 PM

congrats!

rmcarlton · 3 December 2009, 11:14 PM

Congrats!

scl6118 · 5 December 2009, 03:06 PM

The DJ is growing on me. Looks great!

nektar · 5 December 2009, 04:08 PM

verryyy nice watch

deserted · 5 December 2009, 04:31 PM

More and more i'm looking at the DJII......Looking good.

gold4u2 · 6 December 2009, 02:53 AM

Great looking dial! I really love the Roman markers. I have the stick markers because I was looking for a deal. I didn't have a lot of choice....

sea-dweller · 6 December 2009, 02:59 AM

Very nice !!

2 December 2009, 06:05 AM	#37
anipit "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Laura Location: Italy Watch: 16610 + 16220 Posts: 385	congratulations, it is really big, compared to the subdate. I don't like too much roman numbers on Rolex because of the IIII instead of IV, i can't accept they change it to fit better on dial, without respecting ancient romans who invented that kind of numbers. __________________ Laura from Italy. 16610 + 16220.

3 December 2009, 11:12 PM	#54
zak98 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: TN Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,166	congrats! __________________ Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46 Omega Speedmaster Racing Panerai PAM390

6 December 2009, 02:53 AM	#59
gold4u2 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Mark Location: Virginia Watch: 126660 Posts: 177	Great looking dial! I really love the Roman markers. I have the stick markers because I was looking for a deal. I didn't have a lot of choice.... Attached Images __________________ Don't Drink and Draw. -Michael Godard

6 December 2009, 02:59 AM	#60
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Very nice !! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

1 December 2009, 11:20 AM	#32
NYC6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Dennis Location: L.I./N.Y. Watch: SUBMARINER 14060M Posts: 2,769	illumination. Dark shot showing glowing bits.

1 December 2009, 10:09 PM	#34
TheRolex88 Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: South Carolina Posts: 30	Looks Great...now I want one!

2 December 2009, 05:55 AM	#36
Viral "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: NYC Posts: 109	nice watch.........they need to hurry up and release that bad boy with a jubilee bracelet!!

2 December 2009, 06:18 AM	#38
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	the 41mm DJII is not bigger than a 40mm Sub Date and from memory most of rolex roman dials has IIII instead of IV even on the smaller 36mm DJs

2 December 2009, 06:29 AM	#40
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	I'd link a pic of my Sub and DJII for comparison if I was on the laptop....

3 December 2009, 08:52 AM	#43
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	rolex has always used IIII instead of IV for their watches, so I guess you will have accept this non-change issue on the DJII.......

3 December 2009, 09:11 AM	#45
s3lasinc "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Perry Location: Orange County, CA Posts: 84	that's a good looking watch! congrats!

3 December 2009, 10:19 AM	#47
cobblecanyon "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: JT Location: Texas Watch: 116710LN, 116610LN Posts: 453	Very nice DJ II...enjoy!

3 December 2009, 11:14 AM	#48
Deyn Man "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Dean Location: Philippines Posts: 1,037	sweet!!! if i were to get a DJII, i would definitely want that dial! would have wanted the 9 to be in roman nuemerals too instead of the "dash" but that's just me... great acquisition man!

3 December 2009, 12:06 PM	#49
mdtddd2007 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: U.S Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS Posts: 5,785	beautiful...congrats....

3 December 2009, 12:07 PM	#50
1000ftSub "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Orlando Posts: 2,471	AH, very classy looking enjoy

3 December 2009, 01:02 PM	#51
SayangM "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Houston, Tx. Watch: 116660 Posts: 83	Sales guy in Cancun put it around my wrist, since then I cannot get it out of my mind. Wear it in good health!

3 December 2009, 11:14 PM	#55
rmcarlton "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Monty Location: Georgia Watch: Sub LV Posts: 787	Congrats!

5 December 2009, 03:06 PM	#56
scl6118 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Shawn Location: United States Watch: SS GMT IIC Posts: 1,624	The DJ is growing on me. Looks great!

5 December 2009, 04:08 PM	#57
nektar "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Louisiana Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,678	verryyy nice watch

5 December 2009, 04:31 PM	#58
deserted Banned Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: fort wayne IN Watch: Patek 1909003 Posts: 2,176	More and more i'm looking at the DJII......Looking good.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)