ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Watchdog · 30 December 2009, 04:48 PM

Won't be that good IMHO . . . however, some of the models of the DJII are very appealing.

RRGHOST1 · 31 December 2009, 07:09 AM

I am more into the sporty models myself but think the SS with WG bezel and white face looks ever so cool now its size is 41mm. Next buy, is it Explorer 2 (white) or DJ2 (white) Help ! !

Playdrv4me · 31 December 2009, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warnsboy

I would agree, Wifey and I have bought new cars every two years for the past 20 or so. We took the "off the showroom floor hit" to be seated in the latest greatest model. I would view buying watches the same way as you explained it. To put on the latest model you will take a short term hit. I would say that the new DJII is a sweet watch on the wrist. Very similar to the feel that won over many to the Milgauss line. I also like the black stick dial on SSWG!! or the white stick dial on SSWG!! Both are sporty looking and sweet!

Agree 100% Definitely want to try and minimize that hit if at all possible though!

petesjag · 31 December 2009, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warnsboy

I would agree, Wifey and I have bought new cars every two years for the past 20 or so. We took the "off the showroom floor hit" to be seated in the latest greatest model. I would view buying watches the same way as you explained it. To put on the latest model you will take a short term hit.

I ALWAYS buy used cars.. but my watches are usually the newest models, sure I take a hit but its a nice feeling to own a spanking new model,,,
p

BASSETHOUNDS · 31 December 2009, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Idle Swede

.

Hang on guys, as soon as I find my magic crystal ball I'll let you know.

Yes , sure ! And as soon you find it you'll tell us you dropped it ! What will King Midas prices do in 2010 ?

JimC · 31 December 2009, 07:35 AM

Spuds, you make some good points, and have a concern for future value. However, from my perspective, in the story you posted in this thread, it seems as though the watches will hold far more sentimental value to your sons in the long run. Much more than the monetary value, IMHO.

Sure, you don't want the watches to devalue to 'nothing' but even if they do, their history will have more meaning and hopefully hold fond memories for your boys.

spuds · 31 December 2009, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimC

Spuds, you make some good points, and have a concern for future value. However, from my perspective, in the story you posted in this thread, it seems as though the watches will hold far more sentimental value to your sons in the long run. Much more than the monetary value, IMHO.

Sure, you don't want the watches to devalue to 'nothing' but even if they do, their history will have more meaning and hopefully hold fond memories for your boys.

Thanks Jim.....
I just don't want either of 'em feeling "short-changed" but I know you're absolutely right at the end of the day thankyou.

Max · 31 December 2009, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spuds

WTF?????

I simply asked about re-sale values of DJII's.....
I didn't ask for any patronising & condescending financial advice?!

It wasn't condescending financial advice. When it comes to luxury items, I think people should purchase what will give them the most enjoyment, not what they can make the most money on later if/when they decide to sell it. If resale value stops someone from buying an item, that is probably not the right choice for them.

spuds · 31 December 2009, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Max

It wasn't condescending financial advice. When it comes to luxury items, I think people should purchase what will give them the most enjoyment, not what they can make the most money on later if/when they decide to sell it. If resale value stops someone from buying an item, that is probably not the right choice for them.

".......I'd question whether or not you should be spending your money on something else instead".

I didn't ask you how I should be spending my money & if you'd read the thread you'd know the issue in question wasn't what I would get for it but what it might be worth in years to come when left to one of my sons & more specifically when compared to a 'sports model'......
not "what I/you can get for it in a few months".

Armand · 3 January 2010, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

nope! (and i dont care

)

buy what you like not what has a better re-sale/investment value

lets give some love to DJII

I am very sorry - I would LOVE the green numbers - but the single lumi-stick is RIDICULOUS!

I´ll NEVER buy this watch, its "unbalanced"!

I´ll wait for other dials, no DJ II for me yet ...

Hermann

esm · 3 January 2010, 10:02 AM

all cool on my end Hermann. You are entitled to your own opinion, mo need to say sorry.
The one of the good things about Rolex DJ and DD ranges is that there are many dial options, and I'm sure DJII and DDII will have more dial options in the years to come.

As for not being balanced, I totally disagree! The baton at 9 ocolock balances the white date window at the 3 oclock position. Imo I though Rolex has been pretty thoughtful about this "design" and making it an unique feature.... Not everyone's cup of tea, but it us def mine.

I'm sure one day you will find a DJII dial you fancy.... one day.

31 December 2009, 07:35 AM	#36
JimC "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Jim Location: Anchorage, Alaska Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,188	Spuds, you make some good points, and have a concern for future value. However, from my perspective, in the story you posted in this thread, it seems as though the watches will hold far more sentimental value to your sons in the long run. Much more than the monetary value, IMHO. Sure, you don't want the watches to devalue to 'nothing' but even if they do, their history will have more meaning and hopefully hold fond memories for your boys. __________________ My collection, in order of acquisition: 16610 Sub (Z serial) 16710 GMT-Master II (Coke and Pepsi) (Z serial) 16570 Explorer II (White) (F serial) 116660 Deepsea (V serial) 79270 Tudor Tiger Chrono (red dial)

30 December 2009, 04:48 PM	#31
Watchdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Junkyard Dog Location: The Doghouse Watch: I can't tell time Posts: 6,822	Won't be that good IMHO . . . however, some of the models of the DJII are very appealing.

31 December 2009, 07:09 AM	#32
RRGHOST1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: luke standing Location: england Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue Posts: 3,997	I am more into the sporty models myself but think the SS with WG bezel and white face looks ever so cool now its size is 41mm. Next buy, is it Explorer 2 (white) or DJ2 (white) Help ! !

3 January 2010, 10:02 AM	#41
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	all cool on my end Hermann. You are entitled to your own opinion, mo need to say sorry. The one of the good things about Rolex DJ and DD ranges is that there are many dial options, and I'm sure DJII and DDII will have more dial options in the years to come. As for not being balanced, I totally disagree! The baton at 9 ocolock balances the white date window at the 3 oclock position. Imo I though Rolex has been pretty thoughtful about this "design" and making it an unique feature.... Not everyone's cup of tea, but it us def mine. I'm sure one day you will find a DJII dial you fancy.... one day.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)