ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JBat · 23 March 2010, 05:24 AM

My 16610. Easily regulated to near spot-on with a little strategic positioning at night. I've been very impressed with its precision in the 6+ months I've owned it.

PhilM · 23 March 2010, 05:25 AM

My 5513 which I sold

Boadicea · 23 March 2010, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KKB

My GMTIIc is better than -0.5. My DJ is around +4.

My Explorer is -1 and my DJ is also +4

kcmo · 23 March 2010, 05:52 AM

My Daytona

belk7 · 23 March 2010, 05:55 AM

Exp-II

Gerardus · 23 March 2010, 06:03 AM

My sub is more accurate dan my YM.Same movement so

Kanger · 23 March 2010, 06:15 AM

I at first used the clock on my computer to determine whether my watches were running fast or slow, and it made my watches seem either too fast or too slow. Make sure you use time.gov because the computer does not do a good job. The Explorer is -0.5 a day, and the Sub is +5.0 a day.

Alsey · 23 March 2010, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clarencek

Oh yea... I don't wear anything else these days. :-)

nice pix, thanks for sharing.

eonflux · 24 March 2010, 03:25 PM

lost 15 seconds after more than 1 year!

190sl57 · 26 March 2010, 01:55 AM

I just timed a new oyster perpetual non-date model. After a few days it is +-0(zero) seconds daily. That is a clear winner.

Should I expect that to change as the movement is "broken in" (if there is such a thing)?

Bob

milg · 26 March 2010, 02:31 AM

My Milgauss was spot on after 2 different runs of 7 days after I had set according to the us atomic clock. I only measured 7 days as I don't wear it all the time.

23 March 2010, 06:03 AM	#36
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,142	My sub is more accurate dan my YM.Same movement so __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

24 March 2010, 03:25 PM	#39
eonflux "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SNA Posts: 3,637	GMT2c. Last set Jan 29, 2009: USNO +11 sec. Today USNO -4 sec. Only lost 15 seconds after more than 1 year!

23 March 2010, 05:24 AM	#31
JBat "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: Washington Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ Posts: 7,329	My 16610. Easily regulated to near spot-on with a little strategic positioning at night. I've been very impressed with its precision in the 6+ months I've owned it.

23 March 2010, 05:25 AM	#32
PhilM "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Phil Location: London Watch: Sea-Dweller Posts: 1,765	My 5513 which I sold

23 March 2010, 05:52 AM	#34
kcmo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Karis Location: USA Posts: 19,377	My Daytona

23 March 2010, 05:55 AM	#35
belk7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Chris Location: USA Posts: 1,439	Exp-II

23 March 2010, 06:15 AM	#37
Kanger Banned Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: North Carolina Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 5,524	I at first used the clock on my computer to determine whether my watches were running fast or slow, and it made my watches seem either too fast or too slow. Make sure you use time.gov because the computer does not do a good job. The Explorer is -0.5 a day, and the Sub is +5.0 a day.

26 March 2010, 01:55 AM	#40
190sl57 Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Bob Location: Chicago area Posts: 15	I just timed a new oyster perpetual non-date model. After a few days it is +-0(zero) seconds daily. That is a clear winner. Should I expect that to change as the movement is "broken in" (if there is such a thing)? Bob

26 March 2010, 02:31 AM	#41
milg "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: miami Watch: milgauss gv Posts: 6	My Milgauss was spot on after 2 different runs of 7 days after I had set according to the us atomic clock. I only measured 7 days as I don't wear it all the time.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)