|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 March 2007, 09:35 PM
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: germany
Posts: 35
|
I like it..
|
|
|
|
2 March 2007, 09:52 PM
|
#32 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
This one is over the top but there's just something about it.
__________________
..33 |
|
|
|
|
3 March 2007, 03:31 AM
|
#33 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
On the computer it looks like nothing special, In the flesh it probably looks amazing.... Would I be interested in one? No but there are tons of ppl who are intersted in having an "iced out" Rolex
|
|
|
|
|
3 March 2007, 03:35 AM
|
#34 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
|
Not my style.
|
|
|
|
|
3 March 2007, 03:54 AM
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: Aadil
Location: Calgary
Watch: T-Touch Carbon
Posts: 416
|
You all know I love flashy watches but I would not like that watch
If I were going flash id to the all 18k anniv. GMT :) That thing is made for some rock star. |
|
|
|
|
4 March 2007, 03:33 PM
|
#36 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,365
|
Me - no, but I could see my wife wearing it!
|
|
|
|
|
4 March 2007, 04:01 PM
|
#37 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Rodney
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Watch: 18kt RG/SSDJ, SSDJ
Posts: 176
|
No way on the first one. Can't really see the dial very well on the second one. I have never liked diamonds on watches, but the third one really isn't that bad. I guess the difference being that the diamonds are in the dial and not on the bezel, and there are no diamonds in place of actual numbers. To me, that tones it down quite a bit.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
