ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 August 2010, 08:08 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Bah, Humbug!!
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
28 August 2010, 10:40 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
|
28 August 2010, 12:49 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
At least the older-style flip lock clasp did not have welds that are apt to fail
No thanks.........I will keep my tried and true flip lock design.
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
28 August 2010, 12:50 PM | #34 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,251
|
I like the old lightweight, rattly oyster bracelets!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
30 August 2010, 01:06 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
I don't have a problem with the design of the flip lock clasp, but I just wish that it were made of a heavier guage steel. I know it's built sturdy enough, but it still does seem a little flimsy to me. I'd like it to have a beefier feel, more in keeping with the bracelet itself.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.