ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 August 2010, 02:13 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
|
30 August 2010, 02:51 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Ok, I see. Because you said it doesn't go then that means it doesn't go.
|
30 August 2010, 03:00 AM | #33 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
Quote:
Just because it's a rolex doesn't make it fit in at a black tie function. A plainum AP RO Offshore wouldn't fit in either, even though it "outclasses" a sub.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
|
30 August 2010, 03:13 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
|
30 August 2010, 03:15 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
|
__________________
Keith |
30 August 2010, 03:16 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
|
Actually, you are wrong.
__________________
Keith |
30 August 2010, 03:20 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
Okey-dokey. James Bond fan? Can you explain why I'm wrong?
http://watchfreaks.wordpress.com/200...tches-tuxedos/ |
30 August 2010, 03:27 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
|
Quote:
__________________
Keith |
|
30 August 2010, 03:29 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
OK, but who is saying that fashion conventions are changing? Is it OK to wear trainers yet?
|
30 August 2010, 03:31 AM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Quote:
It's historically inappropriate etiquette to wear any watch to a true "black tie" affair... Whether it's a Timex or Rolex or Patek makes no difference.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
|
30 August 2010, 04:03 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Quote:
One thing that makes some sense in not wearing a watch of any kind at a black tie affair is that one is "not supposed to be concerned about the time" at such events. My question has been WHY a Sub doesn't go with a Tux. Someone just saying it doesn't go doesn't cut it for me. Now I understand but just don't agree with that social belief. |
|
30 August 2010, 04:04 AM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United States
Watch: SS DJII
Posts: 183
|
|
30 August 2010, 04:08 AM | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2010, 04:40 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Simple answer: tradition.
A "black tie" event is one of uniformity. There are "rules". Wearing a watch (let alone a large sports model) to a "black tie" affair would demonstrate a disregard for protocol and lack of social experience/grace. As far as the "it's brand X" argument goes... it would make one sound like "nouveau riche" (for lack of a better term). I was going to try and explain this better, but got lazy and googled. I found several sites. Here's one: http://www.blacktieguide.com/index.html If a person feels strongly about demonstrating freedom and individuality, then I'm afraid "black tie" affairs would be uncomfortable for them.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
30 August 2010, 11:28 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
Black face on any Rolex works best, if you are going to have only one.
And, no Sub's with tux's. No white socks, either. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.