The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 November 2010, 12:28 PM   #31
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
What is not accounted for is the price increases of older inventory. This may skew the 40%
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2010, 12:43 PM   #32
sond86
"TRF" Member
 
sond86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Gym Rat
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed View Post
I disagree...Especially on Stainless Steel models. This is overly documented in many threads here.
Yeah true, I agree.

I'm misgeneralized my experiences when I was looking for my last watches and found discount offers were generally not hard to find, but that might.not be the case elsewhere.
sond86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2010, 02:49 PM   #33
fusionstorm
"TRF" Member
 
fusionstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
OK ladies, there's a lot of incorrect terminology being thrown around in this thread. Let's get things straight:

1) Markup percentage is defined as the percentage difference between the actual cost and the selling price.
2) Margin percentage is the percentage difference between the selling price and the profit.

We know that ADs actual cost for each Rolex they acquire is 60% of MSRP (plus whatever additional rebates they might get from Rolex for paying within 30 days and incentives for volume sales; but for clarity sake we'll ignore the additional points an AD might receive). If they were to sell every Rolex at list, then their markup percentage would be 66.67%. Their margin would be 40%.

Example - a Rolex with a $10K list price costs the AD $6K. He prices it at $10K, which is a $4K markup ($4K divided by $6K actual cost = 66.67% markup percentage). He gets a buyer unfamiliar with TRF to pay full list price. His $4K profit divided by his $10K sell price = 40% margin.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090

Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M
fusionstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2010, 02:51 PM   #34
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Whew!

Now I can sleep!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.