The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 November 2010, 08:19 AM   #1
oo7
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Julius
Location: Toronto CANADA
Posts: 217
Sometimes you gotta go ape%$&# on specs to make a point in watchmaking. Rolex did it with the DSSD.
oo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 08:33 AM   #2
Paracentesis
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: James
Location: UK
Watch: Tissot
Posts: 1,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by oo7 View Post
Sometimes you gotta go ape%$&# on specs to make a point in watchmaking. Rolex did it with the DSSD.
They did, but still didn't win the (pointless) specs race.
Paracentesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 08:58 PM   #3
SeamasterGMT
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DeepSea
Posts: 822
To the OP, get used to people bashing the Deepsea on this forum. They really can't help themselves. They know their watch isn't as well engineered, 99% of them have never owned a Deepsea but KNOW that it is uncomfortable to wear. It is bigger than other Rolex models but only by a few millimetres. However, it is not as big as many many other brands.
In my opinion, the Deepsea is a far better watch than the sub and SD 4000 (although I still love the old SD). If I didn't think the Deepsea was the best Rolex I would have bought something else.

I see lots of threads on here about "show me your Daytona, DD, Sub etc etc and you NEVER see a Deepsea owner go there and bash away - why? Because they are happy with their watch and couldn't care less!
SeamasterGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 09:25 PM   #4
Rolexsd4000
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexsd4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: N.Y
Watch: SD43 Mk1 , TT SD43
Posts: 970


I too loved my SD but the Deep Sea is my baby now. Fits great, LOVE the SIZE ,HEIGHT and WEIGHT! Its my daily watch. I do not go to board meetings . Only meetings with Aircraft Engineers. The DS impressed them.

The writing on the ring lock is nearly invisable. The Deep Sea is one very well thought out and engineered watch.

I AM HAPPY.No regrets.
__________________
Rolexsd4000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 09:25 PM   #5
tattooedfagin
"TRF" Member
 
tattooedfagin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chad
Location: the neighbourhood
Watch: 1680 Red
Posts: 2,262
after 3 years of wearing my 16610 i bought my DSSD in Feb this year & it's spent the bulk of this year on my wrist. don't get me wrong, the sub is a classic & i'd never part with it but, the DSSD is phenomenally comfortable & perfectly weighted....i had my reservations prior to buying it but am SO glad i did ..... we all love Rolex but, as for which model, each to their own
__________________
SS Sub Date (F)
DSSD (V)
Red Sub (Mk4)

TRF Hall of Fame
tattooedfagin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 11:32 PM   #6
billyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Billy
Location: england
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 48
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeamasterGMT View Post
To the OP, get used to people bashing the Deepsea on this forum. They really can't help themselves. They know their watch isn't as well engineered, 99% of them have never owned a Deepsea but KNOW that it is uncomfortable to wear. It is bigger than other Rolex models but only by a few millimetres. However, it is not as big as many many other brands.
In my opinion, the Deepsea is a far better watch than the sub and SD 4000 (although I still love the old SD). If I didn't think the Deepsea was the best Rolex I would have bought something else.

I see lots of threads on here about "show me your Daytona, DD, Sub etc etc and you NEVER see a Deepsea owner go there and bash away - why? Because they are happy with their watch and couldn't care less!
+1.....this watch does tend to get bashed...in fact much more than any other that i have seen.
I used to have the TT GMT2 and wore that happily for years, wore well with both suits and jeans alike...when i bought my Deap sea...well i think it truely is an amazing piece of engineering.

the DSSD just fits as well if not better because of the clasp, my son now wears my GMT..some of my colleagues say they preferred the old one, but HEY, i would never go back now...it seems too small...some people will keep saying...it's too big...too fat...too heavy...dont like the writing...we all have our likes/dislikes...mine says...IT'S PERFECT

Enjoy it
billyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 01:41 AM   #7
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by billyc View Post
+1.....this watch does tend to get bashed...in fact much more than any other that i have seen.
I used to have the TT GMT2 and wore that happily for years, wore well with both suits and jeans alike...when i bought my Deap sea...well i think it truely is an amazing piece of engineering.

the DSSD just fits as well if not better because of the clasp, my son now wears my GMT..some of my colleagues say they preferred the old one, but HEY, i would never go back now...it seems too small...some people will keep saying...it's too big...too fat...too heavy...dont like the writing...we all have our likes/dislikes...mine says...IT'S PERFECT

Enjoy it
The only reason it gets bashed is because some of its owners feel a need to keep saying how it is far superior to all other models yada, yada, yada.

Don't get me wrong, I have one and it is an engineering marvel but I don't feel the need decrease the value and joy people get out of their watches. Hence, I'm not saying that it is what you did in your post, but there are plenty of posters that take that route.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 02:20 AM   #8
billyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Billy
Location: england
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 48
Patrick,

i know what you mean and i would never ever put down or otherwise state anything like that, I can see that some do go over the top at times and maybe that is why it gets such a rough time...

but you have to admit.....IT IS THE BEST..

thats the great thing about this place....so many different views/opinions and a fantastic knowledge to boot

Billy
billyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 02:33 AM   #9
TheDeuce
"TRF" Member
 
TheDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Winnipeg
Watch: DD&YM&DaytonaOMy
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
The only reason it gets bashed is because some of its owners feel a need to keep saying how it is far superior to all other models yada, yada, yada.
I love my DSSD but you won't catch me saying it's superior to any other models. It's an impressive watch, bus so are some dozen or so other models. FWIW I get the most compliments on my two-tone Daytona.



m.



PS - is it DSSD or SDDS???
TheDeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 09:53 PM   #10
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
I'm really starting to like the DeepSea, haven't tried one on but as a nerd, can't argue with the specs, and the clasp is a work of art, quite possibly the best in the industry. I'd spend all day fiddling with it.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 11:14 PM   #11
Fearsome Puppy
"TRF" Member
 
Fearsome Puppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
The DSSD is still my go to watch. Though I'd be more than happy to add some of the other watches mentioned in this thread to compliment it...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fearsome Puppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 11:20 PM   #12
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
DSSD is not my cup of tea. I can't stand the blurryness of that crystal when you look at the dial from an angle. I love my classic SD.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 11:26 PM   #13
DS_Obsessed
"TRF" Member
 
DS_Obsessed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: J
Location: Texas
Watch: 116660 V
Posts: 438
I'm very please with my DS. It's weighted perfectly, sit great on the wrist, and is hands down the most comfortable watch in my stable. I have my eyes on other watches, but I'm pretty sure my DS will be my daily for years to come. To each his own, but I have never regretted my purchase.
__________________
_______________________________
Currently wearing : 116000 V / 116660 V / PAM 292 / AP royal Oak Offshore Safari / Royal Oak Offshore Volcano / Tudor heritage / 116520

“For the strength of the Pack is the Wolf, and the strength of the Wolf is the Pack”
DS_Obsessed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2010, 11:58 PM   #14
TheDeuce
"TRF" Member
 
TheDeuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Winnipeg
Watch: DD&YM&DaytonaOMy
Posts: 294
I just got back from a quick dive trip to the Caymans and I have to say my DSSD makes for a great dive watch. It's clearly legible at depth, the glidelock clasp makes finding the perfect fit on top of the wetsuit a breeze, and the bezel is easy to adjust with dive gloves on.

Oh yeah, the extra weight on my wrist means less weight on the belt.

FYI, as of last Friday, my DSSD's new record depth hit 133 feet at the Big Tunnels dive site. A very brief visit to non-recreational depths. I know that pretty much any of the professional line watches can do that but that solid hunk of metal next to the dive computer gives a certain sense of comfort.

Throw in the fact that the watch wears well on land and you have a piece that`s vying for wrist time with the YM, with the others running second and third.

Nothing but DSSD love over here!



m.
TheDeuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 12:08 AM   #15
sirjohnbrian
"TRF" Member
 
sirjohnbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Watch: 'chu lookin' at???
Posts: 964
While it is an acquired taste, it has easily become my favorite watch to wear. I couldn't agree with you more.
__________________

"Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on society." Mark Twain
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson

SS Midsize DJ 68274 "L"
TT Jubilee DJ 116233 "Z"
Sea Dweller DS 116660 "V"
SS White Dial Daytona "V"
sirjohnbrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 02:29 AM   #16
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
There used to be a lot of dssd bashing on this board a few months ago, but it has stopped. Some users expressing that it is too big, or the bracelet too small is not bashing IMO. Everybody is entitled to their opinion. In the past people would say that it is a stupid pointless POS and that is bashing IMO. None of that kind of talk lately. However, I believe that the leopard daytona will always be the most criticized rolex here on trf...
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 02:56 AM   #17
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zed Homme View Post
There used to be a lot of dssd bashing on this board a few months ago, but it has stopped. Some users expressing that it is too big, or the bracelet too small is not bashing IMO. Everybody is entitled to their opinion. In the past people would say that it is a stupid pointless POS and that is bashing IMO. None of that kind of talk lately. However, I believe that the leopard daytona will always be the most criticized rolex here on trf...
Rightfully so on the Leopard Daytona!

Seriously, the can't provide a nice rubber strap option for the divers but they make dials with leopard patterns? WTF! :-)
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 03:45 AM   #18
oo7
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Julius
Location: Toronto CANADA
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by psv View Post
Rightfully so on the Leopard Daytona!

Seriously, the can't provide a nice rubber strap option for the divers but they make dials with leopard patterns? WTF! :-)
I think they did with the Jacques Piccard Single Red DSSD. You may be able to order a replacement strap if a part ref# is in the catalog like past SD accessories.
oo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 03:48 AM   #19
Dan2010
"TRF" Member
 
Dan2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zed Homme View Post
There used to be a lot of dssd bashing on this board a few months ago, but it has stopped. Some users expressing that it is too big, or the bracelet too small is not bashing IMO. Everybody is entitled to their opinion. In the past people would say that it is a stupid pointless POS and that is bashing IMO. None of that kind of talk lately. However, I believe that the leopard daytona will always be the most criticized rolex here on trf...
Didn't you used to have a leopard Daytona on your signature??
Dan2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 04:27 AM   #20
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan2010 View Post
Didn't you used to have a leopard Daytona on your signature??
I gave it to the SO as this board has made me feel too self conscious to have it on my wrist....
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2010, 02:38 AM   #21
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
The watch is a perfect contradiction.
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.