The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 December 2010, 03:57 AM   #31
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
Varied sizes are great in the collection. I do love the classic 40mm for Rolex though. Nice clean lines.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 03:57 AM   #32
baxta69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
I think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
x2
baxta69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:02 AM   #33
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
36mm-40mm is the perfect range for me.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:13 AM   #34
PeterTB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: teeside
Posts: 89
No.
40 mm is more than big enough. I got rid of my sub it was so big heavy and uncomfortable. 36 mm is large enough to sea the dial with ease, but light enough to wear 24/7. The ideal size.
Hopefully the silly 40mm+ fad will end soon, leaving such out-sized watches to be used as wall clocks!
Peter
PeterTB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:14 AM   #35
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
Nope i think 36mm DJ and DD and the sportsline 40mm are okay.
The 41 mm DJ2 is not my cup of tea, sorry just my personal taste.
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:21 AM   #36
KirkWilfred
"TRF" Member
 
KirkWilfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: West Hartford, CT
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 1,224
Wish the Dakota was 42mm! Looks better on my wife than me
__________________

“Time is an illusion.” – Albert Einstein
KirkWilfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:24 AM   #37
general
"TRF" Member
 
general's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 723
most Rolex owners tend to be more traditional.
general is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:26 AM   #38
SCD
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 511
I associate smallness with the Rolex brand. I like to think of the brand as relatively more classically and traditionally styled than most...less trendy, and if that makes them seem small, so much the better...it makes them a little different.
SCD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:41 AM   #39
Rambam
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Norway
Posts: 408
Personally I wish they would make more 36mm and smaller watches, but then again I got twigs for wrists
Rambam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:50 AM   #40
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,008
Perfect size to me!!!
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:51 AM   #41
Nicko
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
No, just the right size...
Nicko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:52 AM   #42
NCD1979
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
NCD1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,044
Personally, I think Rolex watches are the perfect size. The fact that they have maintained their classic style and size is one of the reasons they have maintained popularity for so long and been able to transcended fads and short-lived styles.
NCD1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 04:58 AM   #43
DG123
"TRF" Member
 
DG123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Watch: Oyster Perpetual
Posts: 1,629
I think 34mm is a good , practical, standard mens watch size. To me 36mm is large.
DG123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:06 AM   #44
hhh007
"TRF" Member
 
hhh007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Howard
Location: Midwest
Watch: 18078
Posts: 604
Regardless of ever changing and short lived fashion trends, I think that 36 - 40mm watches are the ideal size, and many other watch brands simply use size and shock value to compensate for workmanship and quality.
__________________
Day-Date Bark Finish 18078,
TT Datejust Turn-O-Graph
Oysterquartz 17013
Explorer I 114270
hhh007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:08 AM   #45
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
Quote:
Originally Posted by hhh007 View Post
Regardless of ever changing and short lived fashion trends, I think that 36 - 40mm watches are the ideal size, and many other watch brands simply use size and shock value to compensate for workmanship and quality.
Nicely put! :-)
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:13 AM   #46
jdc
"TRF" Member
 
jdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
buy the watch you like and forget about fashion, loads of vintage I like that are 34mm does not matter if they are Rolex or not
jdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:21 AM   #47
CKLinLA
"TRF" Member
 
CKLinLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: KL
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer II Black
Posts: 1,480
Rolex have been edging up in size with their new models in
recent years, but being slow to change, its just as the big-large
fad is slowing down or peaking, and maybe even fading?

I think if you found Rolex too small, you'd wear Panerai which
are large and have a Rolex connection. Or maybe you can also
look at Omega/Tag/Breitling/etc who all have large watch
options.

Large or Small also depends on your own wrist size. IMHO, theres
got to be proportionality in how it looks on your wrist.
CKLinLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:25 AM   #48
Dr. Robert
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
I have no problem with 34-40mm Rolexes/Tudors....I have always thought Rolexes/Tudors wear bigger than their specs.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:27 AM   #49
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Love the 44 mm PAM 111 and my 36 mm DJ just as much!
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 05:47 AM   #50
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
I have no problem with 34-40mm Rolexes/Tudors....I have always thought Rolexes/Tudors wear bigger than their specs.
I agree. The super case models especially. I find the subc seems similar on the wrist to a 42 mm PO, largely due to the large crown guards on the rolex, and lack of same on the PO.

On my slim wrists (I like the term twig-like) anything larger than my subc would look downright silly.
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 06:06 AM   #51
al_bongo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
Panerai = clock on a wrist. Prefer something a little more inconspicuous myself.
al_bongo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 06:11 AM   #52
Rani Drama
"TRF" Member
 
Rani Drama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN Sub
Posts: 427
I used to think Rolex was small. I bought a few watches before just generic brands that were in the 44 range and up. They actually look okay on the wrist but i found them too situational. Couldn't go with everything. Picked up my Sub C and it is as diverse a watch as you can get. Goes with everything. There is still a place for the larger pieces just not really every day watches. I remember when i was getting engaged (don't ask i ended it) i was looking around for a watch for my fiancé to get me and asked a sales rep what he suggested. I didn't really pay much attention to rolex back then but he said if you want an everyday watch you can't go wrong with a GMT IIc. I fully agree now.

Never the less i would love to get an APROO for a situational piece. Wouldn't wear it everyday though. I just believe that there is a time for all sizes of watches.
__________________
Rani Drama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 06:14 AM   #53
Olca
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Europ
Watch: DeepSea
Posts: 26
Not really
Attached Images
 
Olca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 06:20 AM   #54
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
I believe 36mm to 42mm is more than adequate. Anything larger to me just looks ridiculous. Actually my Seiko diver is my only 42mm watch. All of the others are between 36mm & 40mm. If I could have rolex custom make me a watch it would be 39mm. I believe that would be the perfect size watch.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 08:14 AM   #55
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
Nothing fits me better than a rolex minus the DSSD. The perfect size imo
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 08:16 AM   #56
clock
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: in a house
Posts: 13,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
i think as you mature in your watch tastes, you'll find wearing a smaller (<45mm) watch is more tasteful than the bigger counterparts.
+1
clock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 09:04 AM   #57
brownbear
"TRF" Member
 
brownbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Danny
Location: georgia
Watch: it Bub
Posts: 1,334
no
brownbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 09:47 AM   #58
Watchdog
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
For some, no. For others, yes.

SO . . .

I don't know why Rolex doesn't offer a couple of versions for each watch. For those who want a Daytona in 42 or 44, have it available. For others who prefer the classic size, keep it.

Rolex is, IMO, too conservative with changes. I'm not advocating sweeping product overhaul, just a little variety to keep up with current trends while still offering the classics.

Watchdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 10:07 AM   #59
Z06
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Within24,901fromU
Watch: 116713 - V
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post
40-44 is just right for me. But it seems like 40 is just perfect when it comes to Rolex designs.
I too agree...My Omega SM GMT is 44...and when I put my on my 116713 in 40...it seems SMALL! but after wearing it now, it seems PERFECT! (and my Omega too BIG)

In truth...I love um both...and they both have their place on my wrist...but my Rolex is seeing all the "time" right now...and I am LOVING it
Z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2010, 12:04 PM   #60
smartson
"TRF" Member
 
smartson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Roger
Location: Toronto
Posts: 604
I have a silly story to tell about my watch taste. 10-15yrs ago, I wore nothing about large watches. Despite my small wrist, I was drawn toward Seiko monster/kinetic, Panerai, Speedmaster etc. I was in senior management in male dominated companies, having a loud watch seemed to be the thing to do. Not to mention, I was also into expensive loud tie, shirt and suite etc. The psychology was simple: look at me, I command your attention. The Datejust my father passed on to me never saw wrist time.

As time go by, I developed new perspective on career and life in general. I now run my own consulting business. Even when meeting client the first time, I don't even want to impress them with anything external. Lasting impression always comes from inside. I dug out the DJ from the drawer. Wow, never knew it is so comfortable and elegant. Then I asked how could I carried a brick on my wrist for so long. 36-40mm is just right for me.

Don't get me wrong, I love fancy and expensive stuff for their beauty and intrinsic value. I hope to pick up a TT Daytona next year. But I would be upset if 'Daytona II' becomes 44mm!
__________________
116610LV
Tudor 79190
Seiko MM300
Seiko SDGM001
smartson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.