ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 January 2011, 02:26 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
No.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
9 January 2011, 02:30 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: New England
Watch: Sub,Daytona,GMT,YM
Posts: 997
|
If you have not already done so, you should try to see the green ceramic sub in person.
I think that it would be a fine stable mate for your 16610 and I think that you might love the green when seen live.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man... |
9 January 2011, 02:36 PM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Frank
Location: Northern CA - USA
Watch: IWC DaVinci 3750
Posts: 139
|
I would get it. I don't think I'm the only one with very similar watches that are very close in appearance and it never hurts to have another watch to pick from in the mornings. Personally, though I'd wait a bit and find one that's been pre-loved to lessen the financial blow as "used" ones are already showing up at less than MSRP/new w/ discount prices.
|
9 January 2011, 03:27 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
I would do it, if the watch looked like this
(borrowed pic)
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
9 January 2011, 05:08 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
If you already have a sub ?....Your second Rolex should be a GMT or Explorer
|
9 January 2011, 09:44 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
|
Maybe. I have a Sub Date 16610. I would consider adding the green Sub-C to my collection.
__________________
Adam |
9 January 2011, 09:50 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: LasIslasFilipinas
Watch: TT GMT IIc
Posts: 826
|
Agree with walds11 I have a 16610 and would love to add the Green SubC to my collection.
|
9 January 2011, 09:58 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: tolis
Location: athens
Watch: daytona tt
Posts: 194
|
not me!
|
9 January 2011, 10:07 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Coop
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Subs
Posts: 6,455
|
Yes I would...I have both.
|
10 January 2011, 12:09 AM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Franz
Location: Colorado/Florida
Watch: PAM, G.O., G.P.
Posts: 174
|
No
|
10 January 2011, 12:29 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: RLX
Posts: 437
|
I would . . . . and I did.
I love the 16610 and will defo keep it. Indeed, perhaps the most iconic and, arguably, beautiful sports/professional watch ever made. However, 11610LN is in my eyes a considerablly different watch. It appears more masculine, modern, sporty, feels more substantual, solid and although a little heavier (around 15gr.) is more comfortable on the wrist. Admittedly, I was shocked at how much difference there is between the two and only fully appreciated it when comparing them 'in person'. I wish I did compare them earlier as the only thing that kept me away from considering buying a Sub-C was a perceived lack of geometrical harmony where the maxi case joins the bracelet judged by the photographs I came accross. What is interesting is that on the photographs the watch indeed appears 'too square' or the lugs too wide and yet when you hold it, or when on the wrist, it looks geometrically perfect. Anybody else experienced this? How about if you take a good look at one (or two, the 116610LN and 116610LV) and compare it with your 16610? See where that takes you . . . |
10 January 2011, 01:30 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
would those be tt scissors. sounds like a fun three weeks |
|
10 January 2011, 02:40 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
I'd 100% flip the old model for the new model but i wouldn't hold both.
|
10 January 2011, 03:02 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: MauiBacerdo
Location: Chicago
Watch: N :Learn
Posts: 902
|
I agree, I'd flip the old for the SubC
__________________
P-Club Member # 7 Time is what prevents everything from happening at once. |
10 January 2011, 03:17 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 87
|
Thanks to you guys, been the Green Sub is starting to be more of a consideration. I will look at it again this week. Gotta rotate the dif ADs so they don't get too annoyed with me.
Mirx, it is interesting to hear that the new Sub is more comfortable than the 16610, because the 16610 is my most comfortable watch -- it just disappears from the wrist. Also interesting that the square lugs look better in person than in pics -- I happen to agree with that -- I thought it was an illusion at first . I understand the posters that say I should flip the 16610 for the new one, but this is not a consideration.... yet. If I decide to get the green sub-c, I definitely won't. If I get the black sub-c, that might be a consideration, but only after I experience both watches for a time and see if I can do without the other. But I am very resistant on getting rid of the 16610. It just speaks to me like no other. So why do I "need" a new sub? Well, you know..... I might, however, do as franksremote suggests..... wait a bit for a pre-loved one at any rate. Will save me some $ and make the hunt more interesting too. |
10 January 2011, 05:58 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: california
Posts: 138
|
I see no point in spending so much $$ to have both. If you want another Rolex I would get something completely different. Maybe a GMT II or Explorer II. I have a SS Sub-C and SS Datejust with a jubilee bracelet and I love how different they are.
|
18 January 2011, 12:17 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
|
Yes, only if I'm into collecting divers watches.
I'm looking to get a Sub Date 16610 (already have the LV version) then a Sub C 116610, black dial. Recently sold the Sub No Date 14060M, perfer a watch with a date on it.
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000U / GW-5000-1JF / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 |
18 January 2011, 12:20 PM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southeast
Watch: Divers, GMT
Posts: 2,149
|
If I had a 16610, I wouldn't get the sub - c. I miss my 16610:(
|
18 January 2011, 12:26 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: M
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex CHNR
Posts: 186
|
I wouldn't.
I looked at both and finally decided on the 16610 couple of weeks back... just looked better to me. My next rolex will definitely be the 39mm explorer. But before that I have to satiate my yearning for an IWC IW3714-01 Portuguese ( will get it this summer ). |
18 January 2011, 12:48 PM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
18 January 2011, 01:03 PM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
|
I saw a lot of new sub c's whilst traveling recently... A lot! They looked fantastic on. I have the 16610lv and DSSD but would still consider adding the new C if i were after another rolex. They are different enough. But I'd rather wait for the new expII next year and get another PAM in the meantime. The subC does not have enough draw for me.
I also don't think you'll find them too similar once on. Whilst subtle the differences are broad and significant enough to make having both a good option.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------------ "The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw |
18 January 2011, 01:08 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
its an overlap in terms of function but as a whole, the new sub is an overhaul.
|
18 January 2011, 01:12 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Florida, US
Watch: du jour
Posts: 1,815
|
I might do it. I complimented my 16610 with a SSGMT-IIc, but would also own a SS Sub-C.
|
18 January 2011, 01:38 PM | #54 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,218
|
I've got both ... love them both. Both LV's actually, but put black bezel insert on 50th LV to provide options.
|
19 January 2011, 12:07 PM | #55 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Watch: GMTIIC,Daytona,DJ
Posts: 31
|
not me. i don't have either sub and wouldn't buy both. i'm interested in the sub c, but haven't pulled the trigger yet, because it looks very similar to my gmtllc.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.