Tudor Chrono for a woman?

[Lisa]

Anders, thanks so much for the pics and information. I'm glad you mentioned dial legibility - this is one reason I would prefer the lighter face with black subdials. Is the dial made of steel? And is the bezel painted metal, or ceramic?

I ask about the dial material because the Tiger chronos with the white dial look like something other than metal to me. Enamel paint, maybe?

Do you find the original jubilee-style bracelet to be more comfortable?

Thanks, everyone, for your comments. I was dreaming about this watch last night!

[Warnsboy]

My wife tried several of my watches and found this 75090 fit well and at 36mm was a bit lighter than my 40mm watches.

[Lisa]

Originally Posted by Colnago

Lisa....it's very rare (if ever) that anyone notices your watch, there's been plenty of threads covering this area as you'll know......but....this watch has had more compliments from WIS and non-WIS than the rest of my watches put together....bang for buck as they say they cannot be beaten.....

Gorgeous watch, Bill.

I have a hunch this watch will hold its value over time, too. I've taken hits on my two previous purchases - a lady DJ and a Date - and while I'm not into flipping watches per se, it's still good to factor in how well they maintain their value.

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Lisa

I shouldn't be spending so much time here lately because I'm getting way too interested in another Rolex (Tudor). I'd been thinking about a nice pre-owned 36mm DJ with white face, fluted bezel, romans and a jubilee dial, but the Tudor Prince Chronograph is starting to occupy my thoughts a lot... it's just so striking, and affordable where a Daytona isn't (at least, with my budget).

Does anyone out there have a wrist pic of this watch on a woman? I don't know much about the difference models, but the white dial with black subdials is especially handsome.

Is it a 40mm case? What's the lume like?

Dan Pierce, can you get your lovely wife to model one of yours? Please?

Lisa,
Sorry, my wife is out of town at the moment. But if Karis can pull off the Daytona, and she does it quite well, then I think you would have no problem w/ a Tudor chrono [same exact size]. You can find many, many Tudor chronos w/out Tiger on the dial.

Originally Posted by bluemartinifan

DP where are you - we need the Tudor master to weigh in here

Dam - this thread is peeking my interest (AGAIN) to join you Lisa and start looking for one.

Up a bit late this morning!

Originally Posted by Lisa

Anders, thanks so much for the pics and information. I'm glad you mentioned dial legibility - this is one reason I would prefer the lighter face with black subdials. Is the dial made of steel? And is the bezel painted metal, or ceramic?

I ask about the dial material because the Tiger chronos with the white dial look like something other than metal to me. Enamel paint, maybe?

Do you find the original jubilee-style bracelet to be more comfortable?

Thanks, everyone, for your comments. I was dreaming about this watch last night!

The dials are metal for sure. The dial is coated [painted]. They are so much more dimensional in person which can't be photographed easily.
The rotating bezels are anodized aluminum just like the classic Sub's and GMT's. The black tackys are also anodized metal, the 3rd option being metal engraved tackymeters.

Sounds like you've decided on a dial. Now you need to choose a bezel and bracelet, or strap.
Best of luck in your search. I know you'll be more than happy wearing one of these classic chrono's.
Now some more pics to wet that appetite.
dP

[dalip]

Great trio DP...I'm really liking the black dial with white sub dials....!

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by dalip

Great trio DP...I'm really liking the black dial with white sub dials....!

Thanks, Dalip!
That's the Big Block. The King of Tudor chronographs. Talk about wrist presence.


Alas, the 79280 [far right] was sold. However, the sale helped acquire the THC so it's all good.
dP

[Lisa]

Thanks, Dan! That last picture was the one I was searching for last night. So if you felt like someone was calling your name...

I hear the term "big block." How does this compare to what's not, well, big block? Unpolished, less curved lugs? A thicker case?

I thought the size was a tad larger than the Daytona. But it's not?

I haven't completely decided on a dial because I'm not sure what options there are. Doesn't really matter to me if it's a Tiger chrono or not... I just like the creamy, enameled look of the white dial, and it seems to only be available with the Tiger. And I think the black subdials are a must. And I prefer Arabic numerals over sticks.



More pics? More info? Thanks - I'm learning a lot.

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Lisa

Thanks, Dan! That last picture was the one I was searching for last night. So if you felt like someone was calling your name...

I hear the term "big block." How does this compare to what's not, well, big block? Unpolished, less curved lugs? A thicker case?

I thought the size was a tad larger than the Daytona. But it's not?

I haven't completely decided on a dial because I'm not sure what options there are. Doesn't really matter to me if it's a Tiger chrono or not... I just like the creamy, enameled look of the white dial, and it seems to only be available with the Tiger. And I think the black subdials are a must. And I prefer Arabic numerals over sticks.



More pics? More info? Thanks - I'm learning a lot.

Lisa,
A quick review:
791XX series are called Big Blocks. They sport the same styled case as the classic Sub's and SD's except even thicker. In fact, the largest Rolex Oyster case made until the release of the DSSD.
The next series, 792XX sports a rounded Daytona styled case and has brushed lugs.
Next, the 792XXP series, has the same Daytona styled case only w/ polished lugs.
Each of these series had 3 bezel options [60, black tacky], [70, rotating 12 hour], [80, metal engraved tacky].

Here's some pics of the Big Block [79170] and 79280 side by side to show the difference in cases.



dP

[Mr_Pacman]

Dan Pierce,

How do you find the durability of the Tudor deployant clasp?

I've got one on my Tudor Hydronaut, and I keep breaking the pin on the buckle (the little springbar). It seems like all the stress is on that springbar when you open the clasp (mine is quite tight). Not sure if it's the greatest design, but otherwise, it's great quality.

Have you ever had this issue? I'm having a heck of a time finding a replacement pin for the clasp.

James

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Mr_Pacman

Dan Pierce,

How do you find the durability of the Tudor deployant clasp?

I've got one on my Tudor Hydronaut, and I keep breaking the pin on the buckle (the little springbar). It seems like all the stress is on that springbar when you open the clasp (mine is quite tight). Not sure if it's the greatest design, but otherwise, it's great quality.

Have you ever had this issue? I'm having a heck of a time finding a replacement pin for the clasp.

James

Never had an issue w/ mine. In fact, it seems well engineered and very robust. In fact, I was so impressed w/ it and the end links I decided to have a custom strap made instead of trying to source a bracelet.
Maybe your's is bent not allowing it to work as designed.
dP

[wehttaM]

Originally Posted by Lisa

Very nice, Kyle. Pre Tiger?

Yes, it is. It used to be mine (I'm his brother, haha) until I traded it for a Rolex 3696. The Tudor is a magnificent watch!
There's nothing you should worry about, it feels like a sturdy watch and it will last you for sure!

[East Bay Rider]

That's it! All this Tudor talk lately has convinced me to wear mine today. I typically don't wear it except to work and so it's been sitting, unworn, while I've been convalescing for 4 weeks now. Today's the day. It'll be nice for it to see daylight again.

[acce1999]

Originally Posted by Lisa

Anders, thanks so much for the pics and information. I'm glad you mentioned dial legibility - this is one reason I would prefer the lighter face with black subdials. Is the dial made of steel? And is the bezel painted metal, or ceramic?

I ask about the dial material because the Tiger chronos with the white dial look like something other than metal to me. Enamel paint, maybe?

Do you find the original jubilee-style bracelet to be more comfortable?

Thanks, everyone, for your comments. I was dreaming about this watch last night!

Lisa,

The silver dial has the same look as the silver Datejust dial. I guess it is the same base material, and I do not actually know what the silver dial is made of. Unlike the painted dials it might be steel. It has a very fine structure to it. But, there are also white painted dials. And those are painted. Just like the white dialled Explorer II. Enamel. Yes.

I would say that the bezel inlay is aluminium, just like on the older Rolex Submariner/GMT, but it might be bakelite. On the earlier models it was bakelite. I am unsure. I would expect it to be aluminium. I need to do some research.

The Tudor Jubilee bracelet is by far the most comfortable bracelet I have, although I prefer the Oyster look. The Tudor bracelet has longer and flatter links, compared to the Rolex Jubilee. If the current Daytona 116520 was offered with the new style Rolex Jubilee, I would definately get one.

Good luck in your decision! It is a huge amount of fun for the money spent! And I have still to spot one in real life. Daytonas can be seen every now and then.

Best,

A

[Lisa]

Thanks so much for the tutorial, Dan. I think for me, the slimmer curved case rather than the "big block" would be best.

I showed this thread to my husband. His favorite is the black dial with white subdials... uh oh!

[Lisa]

Originally Posted by East Bay Rider

That's it! All this Tudor talk lately has convinced me to wear mine today. I typically don't wear it except to work and so it's been sitting, unworn, while I've been convalescing for 4 weeks now. Today's the day. It'll be nice for it to see daylight again.

Enjoy the sun on your face... both of them!

[Lisa]

Originally Posted by acce1999

Lisa,

The silver dial has the same look as the silver Datejust dial. I guess it is the same base material, and I do not actually know what the silver dial is made of. Unlike the painted dials it might be steel. It has a very fine structure to it. But, there are also white painted dials. And those are painted. Just like the white dialled Explorer II. Enamel. Yes.

I would say that the bezel inlay is aluminium, just like on the older Rolex Submariner/GMT, but it might be bakelite. On the earlier models it was bakelite. I am unsure. I would expect it to be aluminium. I need to do some research.

The Tudor Jubilee bracelet is by far the most comfortable bracelet I have, although I prefer the Oyster look. The Tudor bracelet has longer and flatter links, compared to the Rolex Jubilee. If the current Daytona 116520 was offered with the new style Rolex Jubilee, I would definately get one.

Good luck in your decision! It is a huge amount of fun for the money spent! And I have still to spot one in real life. Daytonas can be seen every now and then.

Best,

A

Appreciate your comments... I hope to do a lot of reading about these watches today. I don't want to rush in to a purchase - it's a lot of fun to learn, compare, and think!

I do want the Tudor jubilee bracelet, and perhaps a leather strap to change out every now and then. Now that hubby has joined the mix, the dial options are back in the air...

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Lisa

Appreciate your comments... I hope to do a lot of reading about these watches today. I don't want to rush in to a purchase - it's a lot of fun to learn, compare, and think!

I do want the Tudor jubilee bracelet, and perhaps a leather strap to change out every now and then. Now that hubby has joined the mix, the dial options are back in the air...

If you want to have both Tudor jubilee and leather, I'd shoot for a 792XXP. They come with either leather straps that include end links [like the gold Daytona's] and deployant clasp or Tudor jubilee's. Although if you buy one version sourcing the bracelet or leather strap and all included hardware could be tough.
dP

[PanosI]

I think that you must be convinced by now Lisa.

Tudor Chronos are great watches and if you consider the money that they cost, then we are talking for huge bargains.

Try to find one with both the jubilee style bracelet and the strap with the deployant and the solid end links (best of both worlds and good to have options )

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by PanosI

I think that you must be convinced by now Lisa.

Tudor Chronos are great watches and if you consider the money that they cost, then we are talking for huge bargains.

Try to find one with both the jubilee style bracelet and the strap with the deployant and the solid end links (best of both worlds and good to have options )

That's the total package, my friend!
dP

[PanosI]

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

That's the total package, my friend!
dP

Thank you Sir

[Lisa]

Wow, that's pretty, Panos. Thanks for the pic... looks like the ideal kit!

Back to my original question, Tudor guys - could any of you please find a woman somewhere and put your Chrono on her wrist and take a picture?

[Lisa]

Originally Posted by Dan Pierce

Never had an issue w/ mine. In fact, it seems well engineered and very robust. In fact, I was so impressed w/ it and the end links I decided to have a custom strap made instead of trying to source a bracelet.
Maybe your's is bent not allowing it to work as designed.
dP

Dan - this watch - it's the one with Arabic numerals, right? Was it available with black subdials?

And my husband wants to know - is that a carbon fiber strap, and if so, is it itchy? He really likes it.

[Lisa]

I just found this via 'net search. It has all the features I want: arabic numbers, enamel-looking dial, black subdials, black bezel insert, jubilee bracelet, even a red
hand.

I have not seen this particular configuration on this thread. Does it look legit? Is it superluminova lume? I gotta have my lume!

[Saxon007]

Originally Posted by Lisa

I just found this via 'net search. It has all the features I want: arabic numbers, enamel-looking dial, black subdials, black bezel insert, jubilee bracelet, even a red
hand.

I have not seen this particular configuration on this thread. Does it look legit? Is it superluminova lume? I gotta have my lume!

That is legit, it is a 79280p. I looked for that watch for ages and never ran across one, I eventually went with the one below. It is a beautiful watch that runs at +2 seconds per day but I found it difficult to tell what time it was at a glance.

Ultimately and reluctantly, I flipped it. I just didn't wear it enough. I constantly had to look closely to discern the hands on the dial to tell the time and I found it a bit too thick for me.

But if I ran across one like the one you posted I'd probably have a go at it. It is awesome looking.

[acce1999]

Originally Posted by Saxon007

That is legit, it is a 79280p. I looked for that watch for ages and never ran across one, I eventually went with the one below. It is a beautiful watch that runs at +2 seconds per day but I found it difficult to tell what time it was at a glance.

Ultimately and reluctantly, I flipped it. I just didn't wear it enough. I constantly had to look closely to discern the hands on the dial to tell the time and I found it a bit too thick for me.

But if I ran across one like the one you posted I'd probably have a go at it. It is awesome looking.

Actually, the one Lisa posted is a 79260 (non-P, which can be seen on the brushed lugs). It also seems to have the luminova dial (no "T" on the dial).

It looks OK to me.

Your watch, on the other hand, is a 79280P. A very beautiful such! I had the same dial earlier on my 79260P, but like you I had difficulties telling the time, so I replaced the dial with a silver dial with black hands, that improved legibility a lot.

79X60 = black tachymeter scale bezel.
79X70 = black hour scale (such as Dan's Big Block).
79x80 = polished, all metal, tachymeter scale bezel.

792X0 = brushed lugs.
792X0P = polished lugs (and extra lug holes for the special end links used when using a strap - only on this model!)

Best,

A

[Dan Pierce]

Originally Posted by Lisa

Dan - this watch - it's the one with Arabic numerals, right? Was it available with black subdials?

And my husband wants to know - is that a carbon fiber strap, and if so, is it itchy? He really likes it.

It's real carbon fiber w/ a leather liner. Very comfortable.

Lume is not the strong suit of these chrono's, unfortunately. My Tudor w/ the carbon fiber strap has Luminova but the dots are tiny little buggers.
dP

[acce1999]

Originally Posted by Lisa

I just found this via 'net search. It has all the features I want: arabic numbers, enamel-looking dial, black subdials, black bezel insert, jubilee bracelet, even a red
hand.

I have not seen this particular configuration on this thread. Does it look legit? Is it superluminova lume? I gotta have my lume!

That's a nice looking 79260, with brushed lugs and proper Tudor Jubilee (brushed middle link). My watch - that is a 79260P - has all three middle links polished. The later bracelet also comes with a flip lock clasp. The one on the picture comes with a standard non-flip lock clasp.

I like the brushed lugs better than the polished, but it is wort noting that it is only the P-models that comes with double sets of lug holes to allow for the special end piece that is used with leather strap.

The dial has no T, so it must be Luminova.

Best,

A

[Mr_Pacman]

I hate to hijack this thread (maybe I should start another one).

Dan Pierce or Panos,

Could you do me a huge favor and take a picture of the springbar in the deployant (the one that holds the buckle with the Tudor Shield) and also measure the length and diameter?

Mine broke and I lost it and I can't seem to find a replacement anywhere.

Maybe if I can show a watchmaker and give dimensions, they will be able to help me.

Thanks
James

[Mr_Pacman]

I hate to hijack this thread (maybe I should start another one).

Dan Pierce or Panos,

Could you do me a huge favor and take a picture of the springbar in the deployant (the one that holds the buckle with the Tudor Shield with the pin that goes in the strap hole) and also measure the length and diameter?

Mine broke and I lost it and I can't seem to find a replacement anywhere.

Maybe if I can show a watchmaker and give dimensions, they will be able to help me.

Thanks
James

[Saxon007]

Originally Posted by acce1999

Actually, the one Lisa posted is a 79260 (non-P, which can be seen on the brushed lugs). It also seems to have the luminova dial (no "T" on the dial).

Yes, you are correct. I posted my model number instead of the one she posted.