ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 May 2011, 10:38 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
What exactly is "brittle" about the solid link bracelet on the Sub C and all of the other new models? I understand that the Ceramic bezel and the lug holes are a matter of personal preference, but "brittle" is just about the last word I would use to describe the bracelet on my 116610.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
19 May 2011, 10:48 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Mark
Location: Bonny Scotland
Watch: 14060M Sub (cosc)
Posts: 5,280
|
I can't speak for subtona but I think I know what he means...
To me, the stamped steel of the old clasp would be likely to 'give' a bit under extreme pressure. This might mean that it would bend and need repair but you wouldnt lose the watch. My worry with the new style would be that it couldn't bend so, while it may be stronger, when really pushed any failure would likely be catastrophic...
__________________
Don't mind me. I'm full of scotch, bitterness and impure thoughts! "You have enemies? Good! That means you stood up for something, sometime in your life." Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS. |
19 May 2011, 11:46 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
First and foremost Rolex is a business and since the 14060 doesn't sell well compared to the 116610 I think it is only a matter of time before it is replaced with a ceramic version. Exactly the same as subc but no date.
Sorry curmudgeons he world moves forward |
20 May 2011, 12:55 AM | #34 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,260
|
Quote:
Unfortunately "Danand" is right I am happy I have my old Rolex/Tudor watches......bah humbug......my fellow curmudgeons...one more time....raise your watch wearing arm...shake, rattle & roll those old rattly bracelets w/ the tin foil clasps
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
20 May 2011, 02:49 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Of course Dr Robert the good news is that your rattly wonderful old watch will outlive all of us, so you need not worry about what happens to the new ones!
|
20 May 2011, 04:24 AM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
Chances are zero, nada, bupkis, rien, zilch, zip, square root of sweet bugger all. Not a snowball's chance in hell.
|
20 May 2011, 04:53 AM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
Quote:
The 14060M is a classic with a great history. Updating it along the lines of the 11610 and all you've got is a cut down ceramic sub date rather than something with a bit of pedigree. |
|
20 May 2011, 05:52 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Quote:
|
|
20 May 2011, 10:06 AM | #39 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 359
|
I think it likely.
The fact is, only those of us with a real appreciation for the history of the brand would likely continue to want the old-school model. As the line gets updated across the board (GMT, Sub Date, DJ, Exp, now Exp II....) the average customer is going to see the new ceramic bezel versions and compare them to the traditional and see it as a less desirable model. After all, why would someone want the old style bracelet, clasp, bezel, etc when compared to the new versions side by side in the display case? I think Rolex clearly understands who their average consumer is and what is most likely to appeal to that demographic, no matter what those of us who like old school may want. Just my two cents.
|
21 May 2011, 05:21 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
|
21 May 2011, 05:23 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
|
|
21 May 2011, 06:38 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Virginia
Watch: 116610LN C
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
X3, the GM of my AD said the same thing!
__________________
Don't just make a living, make a difference! |
|
21 May 2011, 12:08 PM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Quote:
What makes the 14060 suddenly the be all and end all of subs? If there was a new sub based on subc it would still be part of that lineage, just once again a variation on the previous models. I just don't get why so many people feel the new ones don't deserve to be a sub? It is ridiculous. Unless a watch is going to be like the speedmaster professional and have no changes over the years it is going to evolve. |
|
22 May 2011, 04:41 AM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oztralia
Watch: Rolex, SINN
Posts: 618
|
I reckon Rolex just needs to add the glidelock clasp and non-hollow bracelet and we're there. maybe a newer movement, but don't touch the lug width, leave the holes, keep the general design as per 14060M. it just flows.
Oh yeah and bring back the vintage fonts, flat 4's, serif tips etc.. on the bezel and on the dial. |
22 May 2011, 07:31 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Beverly Hills
Watch: Rolex/Cartier/FM
Posts: 122
|
The will build it until the run out of parts / movements then discontinue...
|
22 May 2011, 10:23 AM | #46 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
They are updating all of their line up. All that is left is the the Sub ND. It's going to happen...
Maxi dial, ceramic bezel, updated band with glidelock... it's just matter of when. |
22 May 2011, 10:25 AM | #47 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,529
|
Quote:
I've already put on my flame suit but I think what I'm saying has some truth to it... |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.