ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11 July 2011, 10:52 AM | #31 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
I definitely agree with you on that. For this reason I never would use RSC myself with the exception of Bexley in UK who serviced my Comex 5514 and Milsub. Other than that Bob Ridley does my work. I have seen so many people's watches ruined with replacement parts by RSC over the years- such a shame!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
11 July 2011, 11:26 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
Thanks for posting Hunz. I saw that article in the papers over the weekend and thought it had some interesting info which TRF members might find useful.
Yes I agree with everyone here that Rolex shouldn't have to honour the warranty on any heavily modified Rolex, but I think it's interesting that Rolex will service a modified Rolex as long as the parts used are all original. I have a friend who used parts from different Lady Datejusts to make a model that Rolex doesn't offer but since everything is original Rolex, she's had no problems getting it serviced by Rolex. |
11 July 2011, 11:29 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore :)
Watch: Sea Dweller 4000
Posts: 226
|
I agree with Rolex on this.
Once opened and modified, warranty is off If I am a manufacturer, I would not want to clean up for a mess created by an unauthorised third-party provider.
__________________
There is never enough time for good watches |
11 July 2011, 11:36 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
We've known this all along nice to see it in print.
__________________
|
11 July 2011, 12:32 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
|
Has anybody ever hear of a Harley-Davidson? Harley's are the most customized vehicles in the world, and no matter what you do to it, it's a Harley right? I don't (nor do I intend to) own a PVD'd watch, but the refusal to service the Movement due to aesthetic customaztion is silly. Of course they should void Warrany if the case has been opened, but beyond that they should service the movement if somebody is paying the for that.
An erlier post said that some blow-hard big wig stated that once you do these types of customizations, that it's no longer a Rolex. Weird, because if you paint a Mercedes Benz w/ a custom color...it's not a mercedes? To reference changing to a color date wheel or red second hand - If you put Red Mercedes Seats in a Benz that started out w/ black seats, is Mercedes going to refuse to work on it? or again, it's not a Benz anymore? As well, clearly their is a market for the Blackout Sub's, some of which I have seen a pretty Cool looking on a Nato Strap, So maybe, just maybe, Rolex should catch up on this idea! I will post pics of some examples later. |
11 July 2011, 01:21 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
|
Well, that pretty much said everything, very nice post there, drdenn.
Paint it black Sincerly, The Rolling Stones
__________________
♛ |
11 July 2011, 02:13 PM | #37 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: B A
Location: Oklahoma
Watch: None specifically
Posts: 651
|
Quote:
|
|
11 July 2011, 04:14 PM | #38 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
"Ignorance shines brightest when spoken with the arrogance of confidence!" |
|
11 July 2011, 04:36 PM | #39 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
As stated in previous post, I would provide some Pics of cool "unauthorized" Mods. http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_04kZGR_ltm...riner-book.jpg http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_04kZGR_ltm...niel-Craig.jpg Daniel Craigs Project X Sub 1660 w/ no Crown Guards http://www.projectxdesigns.com/admin...1305103047.jpg http://www.projectxdesigns.com/admin...1305103601.jpg No Crown Guards, No Cyclops, PVD etc. http://www.rolexforums.com/attachmen...6&d=1294697820 Still appears to be a rolex to me? I think further anylization of the steel, crystal, and movement would verify that it is all Rolex! |
|
11 July 2011, 05:00 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Alps
Posts: 408
|
Quote:
The mods were all done with original parts by a master watchmaker, but they did not care. That is the reason I'll never buy a Rolex again. And I am shivering now waiting to see what they have done to my patinated 16800 that I sent in for service, even though the service note states that they service the movement only without touching anything else... |
|
11 July 2011, 05:01 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: lunetteverde
Location: Asia
Watch: me @ Instagram
Posts: 823
|
Boring Monday Blues read on "souped up" Rolexes :O)
Nothing new about this article but it will kill your Monday blues I think
Cheers from Sunny Tropical Hot Singapore |
11 July 2011, 05:02 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: 🤔
Posts: 8,424
|
I'm really starting to like the black out look, time to check into this
__________________
♛ |
11 July 2011, 08:46 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Singapore :)
Watch: Sea Dweller 4000
Posts: 226
|
I guess it's a matter of a trade-off if one prefers to purchase a modified Rolex.
This trade-off though is not necessarily painful since Rolexes can be easily serviced by a third party watchmaker Since this is already a known policy for years, it's a case of deciding whether the modified piece would still be more attractive given the lack of direct servicing from Rolex. No point arguing whether it's right/wrong of Rolex to impose such rules or waiting for them to make an u-turn on its policy
__________________
There is never enough time for good watches |
11 July 2011, 09:19 PM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 788
|
Quote:
Well, you don't have to like it, but Rolex isn't changing their policy just because you or others don't like it. Simple really. |
|
11 July 2011, 11:38 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: NCR
Watch: Out for that tree!
Posts: 285
|
Quote:
I think it's interesting to read other members views on the matter. |
|
12 July 2011, 12:40 AM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
|
__________________
*Positive Waves Baby* Lug Hole Loyalist / Chamfer Line Inspector INFORTHE WIN SUB-MAH-REEEN-ER ~ !
|
12 July 2011, 12:45 AM | #47 | |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
|
Quote:
Without looking right in to the techinicalites of what it is you're doing to the thing, my point was that most companies (not all) don't want you modifying a product beyond thier specification... |
|
12 July 2011, 12:46 AM | #48 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
|
I have a couple of watches that are PVD coated, but they were made that way by the (non-Rolex), manufacturers. The dial and bracelet or strap were designed to go with the color and style of the case, and the PVD coating is specifically a very hard substance, like Titanium Carbide, which is almost impervious to scratches and nicks. In my case, the entire watch in each instance cost roughly $1000 complete including tax. Thus the idea of paying multiple thousands just for the coating, (which could be almost anything including soot), is completely ludicrous, especially if it voids the warranty and obviates any possibility of future factory service.
I'm with Rolex. If they didn't do it, the resulting watch is a joke, not a Rolex. As an aside, I have now accumulated several watches that are essentially scratchproof, either coated with a super-hard substance or made of something like Tungsten Carbide, and I can tell you it's very freeing to know that if you accidentally clank your watch against a metal door-frame, or even brush it against a brick wall, you don't even have to look at it because it will show no ill effects whatever. Rolex should think about some of this stuff, maybe combat the 'modifiers' directly by having some of their own models made in that mode. |
12 July 2011, 02:06 AM | #49 | ||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: B A
Location: Oklahoma
Watch: None specifically
Posts: 651
|
Quote:
Quote:
I never stated you have been told Harley would not work on your bikes because of an aesthetic change, as you call it. I stated there are certain modifications that, when made to a Harley, Harley will no longer consider the bike a "Harley". Rolex takes the same postition. |
||
12 July 2011, 03:02 AM | #50 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Honey Rider
Location: San Diego
Watch: Rolex Sub C 116610
Posts: 143
|
Quote:
Unless, you are no longer using the frame of a HD (this would be the equivalent of using a non Rolex case) It's considered an HD! Custom yes, but HD none the less. Clearly, your in over your head on this discussion, as you've missed the entire point my original post. If you re-read my post, you will see the point of the entire post which reads: "the refusal to service the Movement due to aesthetic customaztion is silly!" Again, we can go very slow if needed...changing the look of your rolex w/ custom dials, pvd etc should not stop them from servicing the movement if you are paying for a service! Also, I am sorry if I went berzerk, I forget that some of the Celini crowd are a little more sesitive than others! |
|
12 July 2011, 03:13 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
I'm with Rolex on this one as well. I do the same thing. I mean, if I make a denture for someone, and then they take it to another dentist and have it modified, like put a gold tooth on it, it is no longer my problem.
|
12 July 2011, 03:28 AM | #52 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
|
|
12 July 2011, 03:36 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
Of course it voids the warranty......duh!
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
12 July 2011, 03:54 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 949
|
As long as you pay for the service, they will be willing to work on it for sure. To void your vehicle's warranty, they also have to prove that the fault is caused by the aftermarket parts you installed.
|
12 July 2011, 05:07 AM | #55 | |||
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: B A
Location: Oklahoma
Watch: None specifically
Posts: 651
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And, once again, my point is Rolex takes this same position. This is my last post on this thread. No sense having to make the same point over and over. |
|||
12 July 2011, 07:23 AM | #56 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Jon
Location: Seattle, WA
Watch: Anything well-made
Posts: 17
|
not a big issue, especially if Bamford is willing to do it.
I just don't think doing PVD is that expensive to justify the price premium |
12 July 2011, 08:03 AM | #57 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
So True
__________________
|
|
12 July 2011, 09:23 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
|
Can we disagree without the insults?
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK |
12 July 2011, 09:47 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Sean
Location: US Oregon
Watch: GMT2 C
Posts: 130
|
|
12 July 2011, 11:39 AM | #60 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 374
|
Good for Rolex. I support their decision.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.