ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 August 2011, 11:54 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NYC
Watch: Explorers and Subs
Posts: 620
|
In thinking about this more, you are best to address this directly with a RSC: I would call them to get the information you need to correct this problem. Very sorry to see.
|
27 August 2011, 11:55 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
|
27 August 2011, 11:57 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jinder
Location: Ontario
Watch: 116713
Posts: 601
|
|
27 August 2011, 12:49 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Quote:
This would bug me. |
|
27 August 2011, 01:03 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 8,391
|
I'd just send it to the RSC to be refinished.
|
27 August 2011, 03:52 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Jeffrey
Location: NYC
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 31
|
Ahh.. Ok bai, hehe.. ayo2 dnha..! :)
|
27 August 2011, 09:53 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Destin, FL USA
Watch: Outerspace DayDate
Posts: 2,662
|
I would not worry about lume. When the GMT IIc's lume is put under a strong lamp or is direct sunlight the hands and the hour marker's loose at different rates. I believe it is normal. Mike
|
27 August 2011, 10:40 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: *
Posts: 2,323
|
Send it to RSC and sit back.
__________________
Member# 52,675 Est. 3/2011 |
27 August 2011, 10:55 PM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TX
Watch: TOG + Yachmaster
Posts: 202
|
How about telling us which TRF person ripped you off on this watch so that we can all avoid this idiot?!
|
27 August 2011, 10:57 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Etienne
Location: Malta
Watch: Orient star 300m
Posts: 724
|
Quote:
I refinished many cases and I can tell you that on a Rolex case it is an EASY job. You should try and restore the brushed and polished finish on a Seiko (Grand seiko, MM etc...) and I'm sure you'll understand ... In your case there are no real edges, chamfers, acute angles etc..what you have is just a brushed finish at the top of the lugs and a polished finish on the sides of the case. A watchmaker worth his salt should restore it to like new condition with ease ... I could offer to do it for you for free but I am located in Malta (EU). You could still send it over but it will cost you quite a bit in safe shipping etc... Take it to RSC or if you take it to a good watchmaker make sure you provide him with some close up pics of the original finish so that he can do it for you... As regards lume that is quite normal as it is applied thicker in the hour markers than on the hands so leave it as is... Again do not hesitate to contact me if you want me to do it for you ... |
|
27 August 2011, 11:09 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
Agree with Buddy13. Lugs don't look overpolished. A trip to a GOOD watchmaker and a refinish will do the trick. No a big deal. I don't think it needs a complete service either, maybe a calibration and refinish is enough.
Good Luck Best,
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
27 August 2011, 11:11 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
|
27 August 2011, 11:13 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,155
|
Good decision. Don't fool around with any other option. RSC will have it looking like new again in no time.
|
27 August 2011, 11:45 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
thanks guys, you all lighten up my heart.
just can't believe why on all the flawless and perfect deals have had happened everyday, the lemon piece fell on to me, a first timer. also, due to my geographical location i could not send the watch back easily if this option is considered. |
27 August 2011, 11:49 PM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
|
|
28 August 2011, 12:32 PM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
|
|
28 August 2011, 12:34 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
after thorough inspection, i also discovered the crown guard thickness (round part-uneven) is off.
|
28 August 2011, 09:57 PM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
|
|
28 August 2011, 10:10 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,543
|
|
28 August 2011, 10:18 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
I'd be tempted to go all out and get them to remove the maxi lugs and add chamfers while they're at it.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
29 August 2011, 10:19 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
i've seen a photo of a trimmed GMT2C lug, it looked cool. but i prefer my watch to be unaltered or stock.
|
29 August 2011, 11:47 AM | #52 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
Quote:
Take it to someone who can remove the bezel and redo the brush finish, if you brought it to me I would do it for you for free since you are a fellow TRF member. Just be sure they know what they are doing because you can break the ceramic bezel insert if you do not remove it carefully. Good luck, Roscoe. |
|
1 September 2011, 04:33 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Watch: amacallit!
Posts: 37
|
back from a long weekend holiday.
roscoe, here are the photos of the lugs as requested. the one on the previous post is the lug at 8 o'clock. there's a visible dent, could be the cause why it was buffed the angled grain can be brushed off easily but i'm more concerned of the rounded edges if these can be brought back without making the lugs thin. the lugs looks skinnier on the crown side at 2 and 5 o'clock. can you confirm if this is what you observed as well? |
1 September 2011, 04:55 PM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: GMT+1
Posts: 2,711
|
Quote:
This is a new design compared to the older 16710, and it is used on all modern Rolexes now, even the watches without a moving bezel. In the old day it was a simple pressure fit, but not anymore. Therefore I would be very careful to remove the bezel, unless I also had the replacement part, and tools (skills) to put the bezel back. Reusing the plastic ring is not a good idea: You might lose the entire bezel later on. I guess Rolex have their reasons to do this, but I can not understand what the improvement is in this case. For the models without a movable bezel (DJ, DD) the improvement is that the visible bezel itself is not key to the water resistance as it was earlier, now there is a crystal retaining ring under the bezel that ensures waterproofness. I agree with others that the brushed surfaces on the lug can be restored, but it seems that the watch itself have lived a hard life earlier. The lugs are slightly rounded. Personally I would hand it over to a Rolex Service Center or a Geneva trained Rolex watchmaker with a track record of polishing cases. Good luck! Best, A |
|
1 September 2011, 10:22 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
I agree. Hard life, not 2 bad in my opinion but he's right RSC will true up the edge like no one else and give the appearance of a new lug. If you have someone else do it you might keep looking down at it wondering if it is as good as it could be.
|
1 September 2011, 10:24 PM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
The new parts on the bezels and the vacuum assembly is to &%*# up the aftermarket. Plain and simple. It worked at first but now the aftermarket has a kit to retrofit there bezels to the new watches although I haven't seen their product pressure tested yet.
|
1 September 2011, 10:26 PM | #57 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
I'm sure it sucks just like everything else they make.
|
1 September 2011, 10:40 PM | #58 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Wyatt
Location: Toronto
Watch: it all fly by.
Posts: 311
|
Quote:
|
|
1 September 2011, 10:43 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Wyatt
Location: Toronto
Watch: it all fly by.
Posts: 311
|
Quote:
|
|
1 September 2011, 11:22 PM | #60 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.