ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 May 2012, 08:55 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WA
Watch: All the Oysters
Posts: 811
|
Its a Ref 3940. A perpetual calendar (day, date month, leap year, phases of moon) and a non-independently adjustable 24 hour indication (slaved to the 12-hour display, in other words) The 3940 is without question one of Patek's most elegant perpetual calendars, and was produced in all colors of gold, as well as a platinum version. The PP 240Q is a lovely self-winding movement that's been around long enough to have a track record of solid functionality, too--as haute horlogerie mechanisms go. Has been discontinued and the related 5140 has taken its place; it uses the same movement (and dial indications) and has a similar style, but is a bit larger in diameter. |
3 May 2012, 09:06 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
Breitling????? It's just TOO......too big, too busy, too cheap looking for my taste.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
3 May 2012, 09:32 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
|
3 May 2012, 09:39 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
+1
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
3 May 2012, 09:39 PM | #35 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 116509,A21330,MVQV
Posts: 773
|
Well, not really. The YMII caters to a very specific crowd. It's a hefty sport watch with a very specific countdown function.
The SKD, like the DD, is a dress watch with a function that applies to businessmen. The main difference is the SKD adds complication. I think a lot of people will be upgrading their DDs to SKDs. As for whether Rolex makes it their flagship, we'll have to wait and see. No one defines such a thing but them (in their marketing and PR). I'm betting they will. |
3 May 2012, 09:40 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
|
3 May 2012, 10:32 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
Well, if the Day-Date epitomises classic Rolex, then the Sky-Dweller is all about what modern Rolex is capable of. It's a big injection of design flair and engineering know-how, and has, in my opinion, reinvigorated a brand that has been playing it safe for far too long. More of the same please, Rolex
|
3 May 2012, 10:47 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 1,426
|
|
3 May 2012, 11:07 PM | #39 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
3 May 2012, 11:13 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
|
Doesn't this one list for $91K USD?
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_ |
3 May 2012, 11:15 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
|
I think it's reading June, first year in the four year leap-year cycle.
__________________
Instagram: @whatthedeuce_ |
4 May 2012, 12:59 AM | #42 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Watch: 16610 V
Posts: 511
|
i'll never like the sky-dweller regardless of price. just not an attractive watch and doesn't keep with rolex and its traditional styling...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.