ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Gaijin · 4 October 2007, 03:22 PM

Need to refill my popcorn bowl. Hang on. Be right back.

LMP · 4 October 2007, 04:04 PM

I have been surprised and saddened by this thread. I enjoyed the technical content of Nick's posts, as did many others, judging by the replies in those posts. I have not been privy to everything alluded to, so I can't comment on what I don"t know.

SPACE-DWELLER · 4 October 2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Yeah, right!!

Speculative posts about poor JJ being a sheep-shagger are always ignored!!

JJ, the TRUTH should NEVER be ignored!

Ironstark · 5 October 2007, 01:50 AM

I have`nt logged on for a while so I`m a little slow on the uptake here. (I have missed all that happened with Vanessa although I have been told now)
It is unfortunate it has come to this. However what has happened comes as no surprise and subsequent actions are not exactly a shock either. Its a pity since a lot of his posts were informative and useful, espically to those who do not have access to technical information on Rolex watches.
I can`t speak to others motivations or thinking but my reason for being on this forum is to get a better understanding of and interact with, Rolex owners/lovers (I`m one) and in so doing, hope I can offer a better service to Rolex clients.
I know I locked horns with "Hacko" once or twice (hopefully nothing I said in any way contributed to this outcome, if so I apologise) As result have kept my head down recently in order to avoid any conflict with him or provide ammunition for further conflicts.
I hope all can get back to normal quickly and as always if I can help anyone please don`t hesitate to ask.
I.S.

Gedanken · 5 October 2007, 02:27 AM

Richard, you certainly did not contribute to the problem. If anything, you were a casualty of Hacko's game-playing, and if getting rid of him has been instrumental in getting you back on the forum, it's a bonus!

EvEr34 · 5 October 2007, 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gedanken

Richard, you certainly did not contribute to the problem. If anything, you were a casualty of Hacko's game-playing, and if getting rid of him has been instrumental in getting you back on the forum, it's a bonus!

Well said

JJ Irani · 5 October 2007, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gedanken

Richard, you certainly did not contribute to the problem. If anything, you were a casualty of Hacko's game-playing, and if getting rid of him has been instrumental in getting you back on the forum, it's a bonus!

Agreed.....and thanks for letting us know that Ironstark's name is actually Richard. Always wondered what his real name was!!

You just stick in here, Richard....we need you!!

roadcarver · 5 October 2007, 04:25 AM

JJ, don't you get it? Iron Stark's real name is Tony Stark, not Richard

I guess this would only be funny if you're into Marvel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Agreed.....and thanks for letting us know that Ironstark's name is actually Richard. Always wondered what his real name was!!

You just stick in here, Richard....we need you!!

Ironstark · 5 October 2007, 04:33 AM

Sorry guys, the names not Richard (although I wanted to be called Richard when I was a kid

)

Quote:

JJ, don't you get it? Iron Stark's real name is Tony Stark, not Richard

(could be James Rhodes?!?)

Quote:

I guess this would only be funny if you're into Marvel.

For the uninitiated check out this site

http://www.ironmanmovie.com/

Ronnie Rolex · 5 October 2007, 06:44 AM

If Hacko was the only one doing this why do the rest of us have to pay the piper? Why not just suspend him?

Ronnie Rolex · 5 October 2007, 06:47 AM

Also, doesn't this rule disallowing edits conflict with the rule to place "sold" in the topic line once a watch is sold? I now have to scroll through the thread to find out if the watch is sold.

Mrdi · 5 October 2007, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Yeah, right!!

Speculative posts about poor JJ being a sheep-shagger are always ignored!!

Correct!
JJ is not a Shagger,
He is a Shagette!

daunwaun · 5 October 2007, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mrdi

Correct!
JJ is not a Shagger,
He is a Shagette!

or a shagerette

Ronnie Rolex · 6 October 2007, 01:38 PM

Thanks for allowing edits again. It came in useful for me today.

Lol-x · 6 October 2007, 11:52 PM

You are permitted to edit a post you have made for up to 100 minutes after your post is made. I hope this will be a sufficient window of opportunity for amendments to be made.
If a serious issue arises after the expiration of 100 minutes, you are welcome to contact a moderator or myself, and we will help you out depending on the circumstances.
Having said that, it now appears that this thread has reached it's useful conclusion and so I propose to lock the thread.
We can all direct our energies to more positive pursuits.
Regards

Lol-x · 19 April 2008, 10:01 AM

Personally I would never have anything to do with Nicholas Hacko ever again personally and most certainly never commercially

5 October 2007, 02:27 AM	#35
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	Richard, you certainly did not contribute to the problem. If anything, you were a casualty of Hacko's game-playing, and if getting rid of him has been instrumental in getting you back on the forum, it's a bonus! __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

19 April 2008, 10:01 AM	#46
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,593	Personally I would never have anything to do with Nicholas Hacko ever again personally and most certainly never commercially __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

4 October 2007, 03:22 PM	#31
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	Need to refill my popcorn bowl. Hang on. Be right back.

4 October 2007, 04:04 PM	#32
LMP "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Lawson Location: Santa Fe, NM Watch: GMT's, Subs, OQ's Posts: 152	I have been surprised and saddened by this thread. I enjoyed the technical content of Nick's posts, as did many others, judging by the replies in those posts. I have not been privy to everything alluded to, so I can't comment on what I don"t know.

5 October 2007, 01:50 AM	#34
Ironstark TechXpert Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Rolex world Watch: SS/W Skydweller Posts: 527	I have`nt logged on for a while so I`m a little slow on the uptake here. (I have missed all that happened with Vanessa although I have been told now) It is unfortunate it has come to this. However what has happened comes as no surprise and subsequent actions are not exactly a shock either. Its a pity since a lot of his posts were informative and useful, espically to those who do not have access to technical information on Rolex watches. I can`t speak to others motivations or thinking but my reason for being on this forum is to get a better understanding of and interact with, Rolex owners/lovers (I`m one) and in so doing, hope I can offer a better service to Rolex clients. I know I locked horns with "Hacko" once or twice (hopefully nothing I said in any way contributed to this outcome, if so I apologise) As result have kept my head down recently in order to avoid any conflict with him or provide ammunition for further conflicts. I hope all can get back to normal quickly and as always if I can help anyone please don`t hesitate to ask. I.S.

5 October 2007, 06:44 AM	#40
Ronnie Rolex Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Man. Bch., CA USA Watch: SS-P YM Posts: 679	If Hacko was the only one doing this why do the rest of us have to pay the piper? Why not just suspend him?

5 October 2007, 06:47 AM	#41
Ronnie Rolex Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Man. Bch., CA USA Watch: SS-P YM Posts: 679	Also, doesn't this rule disallowing edits conflict with the rule to place "sold" in the topic line once a watch is sold? I now have to scroll through the thread to find out if the watch is sold.

6 October 2007, 01:38 PM	#44
Ronnie Rolex Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Ronnie Location: Man. Bch., CA USA Watch: SS-P YM Posts: 679	Thanks for allowing edits again. It came in useful for me today.

6 October 2007, 11:52 PM	#45
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,593	You are permitted to edit a post you have made for up to 100 minutes after your post is made. I hope this will be a sufficient window of opportunity for amendments to be made. If a serious issue arises after the expiration of 100 minutes, you are welcome to contact a moderator or myself, and we will help you out depending on the circumstances. Having said that, it now appears that this thread has reached it's useful conclusion and so I propose to lock the thread. We can all direct our energies to more positive pursuits. Regards

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)