ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

dsio · 11 September 2012, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by McLovin

no -- not for an Aquanaut. Yes for a Nautilus.

^ This

Ilias_t · 11 September 2012, 08:28 PM

No. I could not wear this watch and only everyday. I think that rolex makes stunning everyday use watches suitable for every occasion and dressing style.
Unless if you have a third one!

deej · 17 September 2012, 03:40 PM

I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

perpetualman88 · 17 September 2012, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deej

I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

Nope not worth it

weathercock · 17 September 2012, 04:31 PM

Love rolex..and love pp too.. But love rolex more so i say no !!

ChristianN · 17 September 2012, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deej

I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

I love the aquanaut and tried to do a deal like that a while back myself, but we could not agree in the end.

Anyway, the aquanaut is the perfect, casual patek. I say go for it if you want to, just make sure you can use the rubber band as is so you wont have to buy a new one.

bardm · 17 September 2012, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mclovin

no -- not for an aquanaut. Yes for a nautilus.

+1

Singslinger · 17 September 2012, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deej

I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

I don't know about the relative value of the 3 watches but only you can tell whether the numbers add up because I believe that looking at resale/market value doesn't take into account the emotional aspect of the purchase decision.

And to me, buying a watch is mainly emotional...it may be partly rational in the sense that you start by evaluating the numbers, but it's largely emotional, in which case the $ and cents may not be THAT important.

Sirowhite · 17 September 2012, 06:44 PM

no...no...no thank you..

gregdolley · 17 September 2012, 06:53 PM

Personally, I would not. But if you like that model much better, go for what makes you happy.

Sent from my SCH-I405 using Tapatalk 2

byeedo · 18 September 2012, 12:23 AM

no

z32turbo · 18 September 2012, 04:28 AM

Only if it were the 5167/1A.

Not the one on a rubber strap.

TSW · 18 September 2012, 04:31 AM

Nope

capote · 18 September 2012, 04:55 AM

Not for the Aquanuat but for either of these

Hairdude1 · 18 September 2012, 09:03 AM

I wouldn't!

FeelingTheBlues · 18 September 2012, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monte Cristo

The Aquanaut is an uber cool watch, but two Rolexes plus cash? That's a tough one.

A tough one indeed, I think I would probably do it though. I'm a die-hard Patek Philippe enthusiast and I'm thinking it's probably easier to find another Rolex at a good price than an Aquanaut.

FeelingTheBlues · 18 September 2012, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capote

Not for the Aquanuat but for either of these

Come on now Daniel, this isn't fair!

Watchflair · 18 September 2012, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deej

I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

That's a tough call. You have two great watches with the milgauss and sub. If you absolutely love the Patek then go for it. I have seen the PP 2167 on the wrist and while it is nice I think I would take GV or even sub for that matter. I know, and no I'm not just a Rolex nut I am open to other brands. I will agree that if it was the Nautilus I would be in.

AJMarcus · 18 September 2012, 09:31 AM

No way. Two for one anything Rolex is almost never a good deal

17 September 2012, 06:44 PM	#39
Sirowhite "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Singapore Watch: Rolex Posts: 343	no...no...no thank you.. __________________ Super fans: Watcholic....

18 September 2012, 04:28 AM	#42
z32turbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sea Level Watch: Varies Posts: 6,877	Only if it were the 5167/1A. Not the one on a rubber strap. __________________ Instagram @z32turbo

18 September 2012, 04:31 AM	#43
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Nope __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

11 September 2012, 08:28 PM	#32
Ilias_t "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Ilias Location: Greece Watch: Hamilton Riva Posts: 33	No. I could not wear this watch and only everyday. I think that rolex makes stunning everyday use watches suitable for every occasion and dressing style. Unless if you have a third one!

17 September 2012, 03:40 PM	#33
deej "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Philippines Posts: 344	I was thinking that the pp5167 would be a perfect weekender watch and I could use my 1675 and pam111 as my work day watches. The 5167 is being offered to me at $18k, lets say my 16610 and gv combine is around $11.8k and i would need to add $7.2k cash, would the deal be worth it from your point-of-view?

17 September 2012, 04:31 PM	#35
weathercock Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Russia,Moscow Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 77	Love rolex..and love pp too.. But love rolex more so i say no !!

17 September 2012, 06:53 PM	#40
gregdolley Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Greg Dolley Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rose Gold Daytona Posts: 1,283	Personally, I would not. But if you like that model much better, go for what makes you happy. Sent from my SCH-I405 using Tapatalk 2

18 September 2012, 12:23 AM	#41
byeedo "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Real Name: Brian Location: usa Watch: Milgauss GV Posts: 688	no

18 September 2012, 04:55 AM	#44
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	Not for the Aquanuat but for either of these

18 September 2012, 09:03 AM	#45
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	I wouldn't!

18 September 2012, 09:31 AM	#49
AJMarcus "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: AJ Location: USA Watch: Swiss Posts: 5,238	No way. Two for one anything Rolex is almost never a good deal

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)