ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

FeelingTheBlues · 29 September 2012, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gagebuilder

Yeah, but not eyeshadow ...

Attachment 317507

Lovely! It seems like she's wearing clothes that would fit the sky and the mountains of my planet as well!

Watchmutt · 29 September 2012, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lisa

So now how many of us are sitting here with out watch dials pressed up against our eyeballs?

Dang, caught me. But I saw nothing but blurriness.

Lisa · 29 September 2012, 01:24 PM

Just re-read the original post and am confused. If it's a 1980 watch, how can there be any lume? Have you had the watch re-lumed?

Hairdude1 · 29 September 2012, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lisa

So now how many of us are sitting here with out watch dials pressed up against our eyeballs?

Castor · 21 November 2012, 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 77T

I was staring at mine and it seemed that I kept seeing more dials inside the lume and then dials within those dials' lume within the lume of more dials that had more lume than mine. I fell asleep...

I want what he's taking...

RidiuM · 21 November 2012, 02:22 AM

i saw my second hand go backwards once, I think its because I wound it up too much.

29 September 2012, 01:24 PM	#33
Lisa "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: oklahoma city Posts: 15,741	Just re-read the original post and am confused. If it's a 1980 watch, how can there be any lume? Have you had the watch re-lumed?

21 November 2012, 02:22 AM	#36
RidiuM Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Diamond Bar Posts: 17	i saw my second hand go backwards once, I think its because I wound it up too much.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)