ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 October 2012, 03:23 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
It's not for everyone, that's for sure. Only a potential buyer can decide its worth.
|
24 October 2012, 03:41 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Phila burbs
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 755
|
I owned one for less than a year
....and one of the reasons was...."I just didn't feel it was worth the price"...now let me clarify a few things.
It is an absolutely beautiful looking watch Black or White dial. (I had the Black) The other reason - I really really like having a date function, to wear a watch everyday. So that always bothered me a little (I used to use the stop watch hand as my date...today is the 23rd...so I would start the chrono and stop it on the 23 sec) I searched for a few months high and low and finally got one for $200 under retail BNIB NOS back when the retail was 11,200 USD. When the watch showed up I was as excited as a little kid on Christmas morning, but when I put on....My first thought was where is the rest of it...it just seems soooo small and thin. At the time my other watch was a Sub C, but this felt much smaller. I said to myself I think I would like this watch more if it was $2000 cheaper, b/c it didn't feel like an $11200 watch. I am not trying to make enemies, b/c I am a Rolex guy through and though. Where else could I tell this story, some people think $100 is a lot for a watch :) |
24 October 2012, 03:46 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
Personally, I never understood the allure of the Daytona...simply because I think the vast majority of chronos look alike. The same can NOT be said for the Omega Speedy Pro which is far more unique looking.
To me, the Daytona simply blends into the crowd...not really looking any different from a Tag, Seiko, Breitling, Timex chronograph. Why pay more for something not unique looking at all ??? |
24 October 2012, 04:45 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Laguna Beach, CA
Watch: Deep Sea Blue
Posts: 237
|
Worth every dime. Craftmanship and details hard to beat, along with the best stainless steel, 904L, on the bracelet in the S/S version. Fun to have a watch that is somewhat hard to get and not everyone has on their wrist. Submariners far more common. You won't regret getting one and even if you get bored with it down the road, you won't lose any $ selling it...
|
24 October 2012, 04:57 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
I think it's overpriced for what it is - hype aside, it's a fairly unremarkable but solid chronograph. No real background or history of note, virtually impossible to read in bright light, and, at the end of the day, a pretty boring watch. On a more positive side, the movement is excellent, and the bracelet on any modern Rolex is pretty hard to beat. I rationalise the Daytona as a jewellery piece, and it works far better in TT or 18ct - that's when you get the dial choices that do the watch justice, and you also get the level of exclusivity that people expect when they hear the words "Cosmograph Daytona". The SS is by no means a rare watch.
It is impossible to find another watch with the long list of achievements that the Speedmaster Pro has - it's also difficult to find a chronograph that is cleaner or easier to read. The Speedmaster is a truly special watch, and, IMO, should always be considered as part of a serious WIS' collection |
24 October 2012, 05:19 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
THIS. Every word. I'd just add that, when it comes to the Speedy, it's hard to find a chrono in this day and age that truly stands apart from the crowd ....in terms of aesthetics. The domed crystal and legibility... make it the one to get. The Speedy is truly a cool watch.
Quote:
|
|
24 October 2012, 05:55 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
|
No.....and I have owned both the 4030 and 4130 based Daytonas.
Too shiny, too hard to read even during the day, and that darn sapphire crystal reflected sunlight like a Big Dog. It DID look very sharp on the wrist though, I must admit that. Since then, I've crept over to the Dark Side and never looked back. |
24 October 2012, 06:03 AM | #38 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
|
Quote:
To me the Daytona is the ultimate Rolex. No specific reason, it is just the one that sings to me the most. It was my first love, and I always wanted one. If I had the chance to trade my Sub for a SS Daytona with very little out of pocket, I would surely take it. |
|
24 October 2012, 06:36 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cen-Cal
Watch: 16610
Posts: 869
|
Say what??
Your avatar Daytona is a shining example of a hard to read watch that reflects.....LOL!!! |
24 October 2012, 07:16 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Montreal
Posts: 859
|
I frankly don't know very much.. And I see/read the word "chronograph" all over the place. I'm a simple man.. Am I wrong or is this just fancy lingo for a stop watch?.
Unless you're in sports, track and field or a coach.. Who in this day and age needs a stop watch?. I just honestly don't get it. The Daytona in 18k gold looks damn nice.. But anything by Rolex in 18k looks swell. I just don't get it.. I respect it and don't think it's ugly or remotely unattractive, I just don't get who needs the 3 dials. My little rant lol |
24 October 2012, 07:58 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: 16610
Posts: 214
|
If you have the money to spend on one, then its worth it. If you want a deal, get a pre-owned.
|
24 October 2012, 08:00 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: 16610
Posts: 214
|
Quote:
|
|
24 October 2012, 08:25 AM | #43 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,216
|
Quote:
There are times, on occasion, when I need to calculate units per hour or measure the duration of digital content in front of clients who are always amazed how much info is culled from the trusty precision instrument strapped to my wrist. dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
|
24 October 2012, 08:28 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Will
Location: Canada
Watch: The Sky
Posts: 1,824
|
all these responses
and not one picture shame! lol |
24 October 2012, 08:28 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Different strokes.....If you like chrono's & like the brand, you'll get a Daytona regardless of price.
|
24 October 2012, 08:31 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Montreal
Posts: 859
|
Hi Nauticajoe,
You're right..I now have 6 Rolexes.. Different models etc.. My next one will be 18k Daytona or DD.. But Daytona in 18k is a killer |
24 October 2012, 08:32 AM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: DrK
Location: India
Watch: 4=YMDaytonaGMTHulk
Posts: 7,052
|
I own a SS Daytona. It is a nice piece and I like to wear it but always thought needless halo surrounded this watch due to marketing ploy.
|
24 October 2012, 08:36 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 67
|
I agree with your argument that the SS Daytona doesn't seem worth the premium in price. Its a great looking watch, but don't think that warrants the additional price. Would much rather have the Sub or DJII as both feel they are better values.
But if I was super rich and had $30-40K to spend on a watch, would get the gold Daytona just as easily as the DD. Quote:
|
|
24 October 2012, 08:43 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: East Coast
Watch: 116520
Posts: 135
|
|
24 October 2012, 08:48 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
|
24 October 2012, 08:57 AM | #51 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
LEFT BRAIN: as a chronograph, there's many better options at 1/3 the price or less...
RIGHT BRAIN: as a rolex, its superb and worth every penny... |
24 October 2012, 09:05 AM | #52 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
Any Rolex is worth the money.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
24 October 2012, 09:09 AM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Quote:
I can think of the Omega Planet Ocean with Cal. 9300... but then again, it doesn't have the same resale value. Then there's the VC Overseas Chrono... but it's more expensive than the SS Daytona and has a worse resale value, too.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
|
24 October 2012, 09:13 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
Brand blindless maybe?? I like Rolex alot and have two...but, when you get up to a certain level of quality and rep..... Aesthetics, Uniqueness, History, and Originality matter. A Daytona? Why get something that looks like everything else?? Why blend when it comes to looks? No brainer...truly a no go when it comes to the Daytona.
That's not really PC on a brand forum, I know. But, there it is. |
24 October 2012, 09:51 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC/NJ
Posts: 1,107
|
the demand for the daytona still exist after all these years. IMO, its quite an attractive watch, however not my cup of tea.
|
24 October 2012, 10:00 AM | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
Quote:
for Right Brain... just the daytona... and that's just fine. |
|
24 October 2012, 01:46 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 135
|
I finally bought a white SS Daytona a few months ago and really love it, beautiful watch and yes it is hard to read the subdials. I had two other chronos, a Speedy Pro moon phase and an IWC 3760. I absolutely loved the speedy and because of that I gave it to my younger son when he graduated from College. He had always admired the moon phase and it was a pleasure to give it to him as he heads off to med school. We just got it back from a full factory servicing. I still have the IWC and it is a nice watch with a great band, but I do not wear it all that often anymore even though it is very usable as a timer.
I just happen to really like the Daytona for daily business wear, but everyone has to own a Speedmaster at some point as well. Classic! T |
24 October 2012, 02:01 PM | #58 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
The Rolex Daytona has achieved icon status, it is as simple as that. Once a "Veblen good" reaches that unique status rationale about the actual worth/value doesn't factor in. Is a Mont Blanc Meisterstuck simple ballpoint pen really worth $350? Is the Eames Lounge chair worth $5K?
|
24 October 2012, 02:05 PM | #59 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
YES ... but NO according to my parents and my girlfriend.
|
24 October 2012, 02:12 PM | #60 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I had a chance to try on a black dial SS Daytona recently and to my amazement I could not read the numbers on the subdials.
I thought maybe the light was too bright over the display case, but even in normal light I could not read the red numbers against the silver background. This is a deal killer as far as I'm concerned and I was greatly disappointed. I've never been attracted to the Daytona in the way that I have been attracted to the Omega Moon Watch or some of the older IWC Pilot Chronographs in terms of style, but if you can't even read the calibrations, then the watch ceases to be an instrument and becomes simply another piece of expensive jewelry. I really hope that the Daytona is up for a redesign in the near future and it gets back to its tool watch roots.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.