ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Casey VP-26 · 20 February 2013, 11:27 PM

I have posted this once before.

While surfing on the timezone forum, I came across an interesting thread, dating Nov.2, 2010 where James Dowling responded and one of the sentences was Quote: The GMT has always outsold the Sub by a considerable margin, even though most watchnuts consider the Sub the more iconic watch. Unquote.

This is a surprise to me and a even a bigger surprise when you use the words, By a considerable margin.

RolexDivers · 20 February 2013, 11:46 PM

wow! only a $100 diff? Are you talking ceramic sub and ceramic gmt?

20 February 2013, 11:27 PM	#31
Casey VP-26 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: America Posts: 2,721	I have posted this once before. While surfing on the timezone forum, I came across an interesting thread, dating Nov.2, 2010 where James Dowling responded and one of the sentences was Quote: The GMT has always outsold the Sub by a considerable margin, even though most watchnuts consider the Sub the more iconic watch. Unquote. This is a surprise to me and a even a bigger surprise when you use the words, By a considerable margin.

20 February 2013, 11:46 PM	#32
RolexDivers Banned Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: BIG BEAR, CA Posts: 1,468	wow! only a $100 diff? Are you talking ceramic sub and ceramic gmt?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)